Daxian people: Difference between revisions

Bigamy has been practiced in [[Daxia]] for thousands of years, going back to the reign of Emperor Chiliang of the Xie dynasty. An old man by the time he ascended to the imperial throne, Chiliang's progeny had suffered from great misfortune and he had no male heir. The emperor consulted with a great council of sages and their learned conclusion was that the emperor should be allowed to marry as many wives as he needed. Not lacking in wisdom himself, the emperor counseled restraint, were he to sire too many sons they would surely fight amongst themselves and tear the empire to bloody shreds once Chiliang passed on, and so two wives would suffice for his great need. So resolved, Chiliang set aside his aged wife, married two nubile maidens that beget him three strong sons to carry on his bloodline into the future. And so that none of his subjects had cause to complain that their emperor ate alone, he passed a decree that was carved in imperial marble: ''Let all the subjects living on my lands and under my sky secure the immortality of their names, as have I, let every man be entitled to marrying twice''; this is known as Chiliang's Pact. This decree was studiously respected by all succeeding dynasties for a number of reasons, the vast majority of the population worked in agriculture for a long time, having two wives meant more kids were available to add to a farm's labor pool. Abrogating Chiliang's Pact would be very unpopular, especially if the emperor continued the practice himself, which they would want to do given the high rates of infant mortality even among nobility. Bigamy was codified by every dynasty from Shang to Qian, all of which also made legal provisions for the caring of the numerous abandoned children and laws on the payment of pensions by the state to widows with small children. Bigamy continues to be legal in the modern era and [[Daxia]]ns continue to practice it but not to the same extent as in the past. The rising cost of living, insufficient social services, marital breakdown and the onerous expenses of having many children and also of divorcing dissuade many men from fulfilling their right to be bigamonous.