14,074
edits
m (→Governance) |
m (Text replacement - "Category:2023 Award winning pages" to "{{Template:Award winning article}} Category:2023 Award winning pages") |
||
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 47: | Line 47: | ||
Provinces, localities, and the [[Collegium Scientificum]] share degrees of power over public education, with the provinces exercising the most control and oversight of the three parties with respect to the practical logistical administration of the schools. | Provinces, localities, and the [[Collegium Scientificum]] share degrees of power over public education, with the provinces exercising the most control and oversight of the three parties with respect to the practical logistical administration of the schools. | ||
The issue of legislative authority over the school system is a fraught political issue. The [[Concilium Daoni]] has traditionally asserted its supremacy over the Collegium Scientificum in its role as regulator, and accordingly passes various statutes related to the education system in the form of the [[Consolidated_Laws_of_HMCM%27s_Kingdom_and_State#List_of_chapters|Education Law]]. The Collegium has never accepted the Daoni's claims, but nonetheless largely complies with the provisions of the Education Law on a negotiated basis. The issue has been deferred several times by the [[Criminal_justice_system_of_Urcea#Hierarchy_of_courts|Archducal Court]] of [[Urcea]], stating that the Collegium as an ecclesially chartered institution is beyond the authority of the Daoni, but otherwise stating that it's a political, not legal, matter. As a pragmatic precedent, most Education Law changes are negotiated before they are considered by any of the Daoni's committees. | The issue of legislative authority over the school system is a fraught political issue. The [[Concilium Daoni]] has traditionally asserted its supremacy over the Collegium Scientificum in its role as regulator, and accordingly passes various statutes related to the education system in the form of the [[Consolidated_Laws_of_HMCM%27s_Kingdom_and_State#List_of_chapters|Education Law]]. The Collegium has never accepted the Daoni's claims, but nonetheless largely complies with the provisions of the Education Law on a negotiated basis. The issue has been deferred several times by the [[Criminal_justice_system_of_Urcea#Hierarchy_of_courts|Archducal Court]] of [[Urcea]], stating that the Collegium as an ecclesially chartered institution is beyond the authority of the Daoni, but otherwise stating that it's a political, not legal, matter. As a pragmatic precedent, most Education Law changes are negotiated before they are considered by any of the Daoni's committees. Views on the topic vary by political party and affiliation; the [[Solidarity Party (Urcea)|Solidarity Party]] is considered the most deferential towards the Collegium's independence, the [[National Pact (Urcea)|National Pact]] is considered to be relatively aggressive, and the [[Social Labor Party (Urcea)|Social Labor Party]] calls for the complete supremacy of the government over the education system, advocating the creation of a secular Education Ministry. | ||
===Funding for K-12=== | ===Funding for K-12=== | ||
Line 55: | Line 55: | ||
[[Category: Urcea]] | [[Category: Urcea]] | ||
[[Category: Education]] | [[Category: Education]] | ||
{{Template:Award winning article}} | |||
[[Category:2023 Award winning pages]] | [[Category:2023 Award winning pages]] | ||
[[Category:IXWB]] | [[Category:IXWB]] |