4,331
edits
Supreme Court of Cartadania: Difference between revisions
m
no edit summary
mNo edit summary |
|||
| (2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{wip}} | {{wip}} | ||
{{Infobox high court | {{Infobox high court | ||
|court_name | | court_name = Supreme Court of Cartadania | ||
|image | | image = Coat of Arms of Cartadania.svg | ||
|imagesize | | imagesize = 150px | ||
|caption | | caption = Coat of Arms of Cartadania | ||
|established | | image2 = The_Athens_Academy_-_Greece_-_panoramio.jpg | ||
|country | | image_upright2 = | ||
|location | | imagesize2 = 240px | ||
|coordinates= | | alt2 = | ||
| type | | caption2 = The Supreme Court Building | ||
|authority = [[Constitution of Cartadania]] | | established = 1632 | ||
|appealsfrom = {{bulleted list|Supreme Courts of the [[Administrative divisions of Cartadania|States and Territories]]|[[Federal Court of Appeals (Cartadania)|Federal Court of Appeals]]|[[Federal Circuit Court of Cartadania|Federal Circuit Court]]}} | | country = [[Cartadania]] | ||
| location = [[Giulia]], [[Alahuela]] | |||
| coordinates = | |||
| type = Supreme Court bench with Senate and Presidential {{wp|Advice and consent|confirmation}} | |||
|authority = [[Constitution of Cartadania]] | |||
|appealsfrom = {{bulleted list|Supreme Courts of the [[Administrative divisions of Cartadania|States and Territories]]|[[Federal Court of Appeals (Cartadania)|Federal Court of Appeals]]|[[Federal Circuit Court of Cartadania|Federal Circuit Court]]}} | |||
|terms = Life tenure | |terms = Life tenure | ||
|positions = 9, by statute | |positions = 9, by statute | ||
| Line 17: | Line 22: | ||
|chiefjudgetitle = [[Chief Justice of Cartadania]] | |chiefjudgetitle = [[Chief Justice of Cartadania]] | ||
|chiefjudgename = [[Esperança Rodrigues]] | |chiefjudgename = [[Esperança Rodrigues]] | ||
|termstart = 13 May | |termstart = 13 May 2024 | ||
|termend = | |termend = | ||
}} | }} | ||
| Line 26: | Line 31: | ||
== History == | == History == | ||
The historical evolution of the Supreme Court of Cartadania reflects a dynamic path of development, driven by the nation's changing needs and the evolving structure of its government. Following the establishment of the Caridon Federation in [[1630]], there was a notable absence of a central apex court. Calls for such an institution to address issues beyond the jurisdiction of state courts were made, but these suggestions were initially dismissed due to concerns regarding the associated costs and the practicality of establishing a centrally located court that could serve the entire federation. However, the course of history took a different turn in 1632 when the constitution forming the Caridon Federal Republic, later renamed the present, Cartadania, mandated the creation of a central court. This court was tasked with adjudicating disputes between states, interpreting federal law, assessing the constitutionality of laws, and holding original jurisdiction over cases involving Ambassadors, other public Ministers and Consuls, and those in which a state was a party. While its powers were relatively limited compared to its contemporary counterpart, this marked the inception of the Supreme Court. | The historical evolution of the Supreme Court of Cartadania reflects a dynamic path of development, driven by the nation's changing needs and the evolving structure of its government. Following the establishment of the Caridon Federation in [[1630]], there was a notable absence of a central apex court. Calls for such an institution to address issues beyond the jurisdiction of state courts were made, but these suggestions were initially dismissed due to concerns regarding the associated costs and the practicality of establishing a centrally located court that could serve the entire federation. However, the course of history took a different turn in [[1632]] when the constitution forming the Caridon Federal Republic, later renamed the present, Cartadania, mandated the creation of a central court. This court was tasked with adjudicating disputes between states, interpreting federal law, assessing the constitutionality of laws, and holding original jurisdiction over cases involving Ambassadors, other public Ministers and Consuls, and those in which a state was a party. While its powers were relatively limited compared to its contemporary counterpart, this marked the inception of the Supreme Court. | ||
In its early days, the Supreme Court operated within a constrained scope, with justices drawn from state supreme courts, each serving for a designated period, usually ranging from one to two years. This arrangement persisted for nearly sixty-five years. However, the period leading up to the [[Ano Vermelho]] saw a Supreme Court that was increasingly hesitant to accept cases, often deferring them to lower courts. This hesitancy was rooted in the court's limited powers, as some judicial authority still resided with the president, and in the close affiliations between certain state justices and those in power. In response to these challenges, the Constitution of Cartadania underwent revisions in [[1710]]. These revisions ushered in a significant transformation, stripping the president of all judicial powers and transferring them to the Supreme Court. Concurrently, the number of Justices was expanded from five to nine, a configuration that endures to this day. | In its early days, the Supreme Court operated within a constrained scope, with justices drawn from state supreme courts, each serving for a designated period, usually ranging from one to two years. This arrangement persisted for nearly sixty-five years. However, the period leading up to the [[Ano Vermelho]] saw a Supreme Court that was increasingly hesitant to accept cases, often deferring them to lower courts. This hesitancy was rooted in the court's limited powers, as some judicial authority still resided with the president, and in the close affiliations between certain state justices and those in power. In response to these challenges, the Constitution of Cartadania underwent revisions in [[1710]]. These revisions ushered in a significant transformation, stripping the president of all judicial powers and transferring them to the Supreme Court. Concurrently, the number of Justices was expanded from five to nine, a configuration that endures to this day. | ||
| Line 81: | Line 86: | ||
| [[File:SUTRICA Gabriel Morosanu.jpg|frameless|100px]] | | [[File:SUTRICA Gabriel Morosanu.jpg|frameless|100px]] | ||
| '''{{sortname|Gabriel|Morosanu}}''' | | '''{{sortname|Gabriel|Morosanu}}''' | ||
| [[ | | [[Maresia]] <small>([[Aumiers]])</small> | ||
| align="center"| {{dts|26 November 2027}} | | align="center"| {{dts|26 November 2027}} | ||
| [[Cartadania Court of Appeals]] | | [[Cartadania Court of Appeals]] | ||
| [[University of | | [[University of Maresia]] | ||
|- | |- | ||
| [[File:SUTRICA Atini Tuiaa.jpg|frameless|100px]] | | [[File:SUTRICA Atini Tuiaa.jpg|frameless|100px]] | ||