Bettencourt v. Hjortsberg: Difference between revisions
Created page with "{{Infobox court case|name=Bettencourt v. Hjortsberg |FullName=*Mr Pascal Bettencourt v. Hjortsberg Transactions Inc. and Partners* |CourtName=High Court of Olmeria, Supreme Court of Olmeria |court=High Court of Olmeria, Supreme Court of Olmeria |image=Courtroom journalists Bettencourt v. Hjortsberg.jpg |caption=The case gained substantial media attention |ArgueDate=1 - 13 October |ArgueDateB=21 October - 11 November |ArgueYear=1974 |SubmitDate=5 August |D..." |
mNo edit summary |
||
| (2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{wip}} | |||
{{Infobox court case|name=Bettencourt v. Hjortsberg | {{Infobox court case|name=Bettencourt v. Hjortsberg | ||
|FullName=*Mr Pascal Bettencourt v. Hjortsberg Transactions Inc. and Partners* | |FullName=*Mr Pascal Bettencourt v. Hjortsberg Transactions Inc. and Partners* | ||
| Line 4: | Line 5: | ||
|court=[[High Court of Olmeria]], [[Supreme Court of Olmeria]] | |court=[[High Court of Olmeria]], [[Supreme Court of Olmeria]] | ||
|image=Courtroom journalists Bettencourt v. Hjortsberg.jpg | |image=Courtroom journalists Bettencourt v. Hjortsberg.jpg | ||
|caption=The case gained substantial media attention | |caption=The case gained substantial media attention due to its constitutional significance | ||
|ArgueDate=1 - 13 October | |ArgueDate=1 - 13 October | ||
|ArgueDateB=21 October - 11 November | |ArgueDateB=21 October - 11 November | ||
|ArgueYear= | |ArgueYear=2014 | ||
|SubmitDate=5 August | |SubmitDate=5 August | ||
|DecideDate=16th November | |DecideDate=16th November | ||
|DecideYear= | |DecideYear=2014 | ||
|start_date=20 October | |start_date=20 October 2014 | ||
|SubmitYear= | |SubmitYear=2014 | ||
|defendant=Hjortsberg Transactions Inc. and Partners | |defendant=Hjortsberg Transactions Inc. and Partners | ||
|prosecution=Mörner Soliciters on behalf of Pascal Bettencourt | |prosecution=Mörner Soliciters on behalf of Pascal Bettencourt | ||
| Line 27: | Line 28: | ||
|Keywords=Tourism, Data Breach, Data Security, Money, Finances, Corporation, Constitution, Foreigner, Yonderre|Claim=300,000 Lund plus damages and legal fees|Ruling=Mr Bettencourt is entitled to the same right to "privacy from corporate entities", in all their forms as all who are classed as citizens of Olmeria. Therefore we deem the actions of Hjortsberg Inc. wholly unlawful, and declare that they must pay Mr Bettencourt a total of 350,000 Lund, in addition to legal fees, in payment for their breach of his right to privacy.}} | |Keywords=Tourism, Data Breach, Data Security, Money, Finances, Corporation, Constitution, Foreigner, Yonderre|Claim=300,000 Lund plus damages and legal fees|Ruling=Mr Bettencourt is entitled to the same right to "privacy from corporate entities", in all their forms as all who are classed as citizens of Olmeria. Therefore we deem the actions of Hjortsberg Inc. wholly unlawful, and declare that they must pay Mr Bettencourt a total of 350,000 Lund, in addition to legal fees, in payment for their breach of his right to privacy.}} | ||
'''Bettencourt v. Hjortsberg''' was a high profile civil court case in [[Olmeria]] | '''Bettencourt v. Hjortsberg''' was a high profile civil court case in [[Olmeria]] which has influenced the interpretation of Constitutional law and the application of rights to non citizens to date. Mr Pascal Bettencourt, a Yonderian tourist who visited Olmeria on holiday in June 2014, sued financial company [[Hjortsberg Transactions Inc.]] after they sold his financial details to a foreign company. Mr Bettencourt subsequently lost over Ⱡ50,000 (₮31,500) in a series of fraudulent withdrawals from three separate bank accounts. | ||
The case was taken to the [[Supreme Court of Olmeria|Supreme Court]] after Hjortsberg Transactions appealed the High Court's ruling against them on the grounds that Mr Bettencourt should not be entitled to the same right to "privacy from corporate entities", as the High Court ruling had referenced, because he was not Olmerian. The Supreme Court ruled in favour of Mr Bettencourt on the grounds of the [[Second Constitution of Olmeria]] and subsequent legislation [[The People's Act 1969|The People's Act (1969)]], which they argued entitled foreign tourists to the same right to privacy as Olmerian citizens. Hjortsberg Transactions were forced to pay Ⱡ350,000 to Mr Bettencourt, in addition to legal fees and any future damages if the total ever exceeded 350,000Ⱡ. | |||
The company also faced a wider scandal over its use of clients data, and was the subject of an official investigation by the financial regulator OFCoR later that year, which concluded with the bankrupting of the company after it was ordered to pay out millions in compensation for other victims, both Olmerian and foreign. | |||
== Background == | |||
At the time of the case, Mr Pascal Bettencourt, a native Yonderian, was aged 53 and working as a manager in an electronics firm. He visited to Olmeria for the first time with his wife and two children in a two week holiday, from the 4th to 19th June 2014. The family chose Olmeria as they had found cheap flights, and wanted to explore the colder, rural regions of the country. | |||
Bettencourt employed the money changing services of Hjortsberg Transactions before travelling, transferring around ₮1000 into around Ⱡ1560 through the online FastChange™. | |||
The FastChange™ system involves clients prepaying online onto a temporary card, which they can then use for a set duration in the relevant nation. Clients can also withdraw cash upon arrival in the nation, or arrange to receive part or all of their transfer in cash at the Hjortsberg facilities in most major Olmerian cities and airports. | |||
== High Court Case == | |||
[[File:Ceo questioned Bettencourt trial.jpg|left|thumb|Hjortsberg CEO Isak Mossing is questioned by the High Court over the companies use of clients data. ]] | [[File:Ceo questioned Bettencourt trial.jpg|left|thumb|Hjortsberg CEO Isak Mossing is questioned by the High Court over the companies use of clients data. ]] | ||
== Supreme Court Case == | |||
== Significance == | |||
[[Category:Law]] | |||
[[Category:IXWB]] | |||
[[Category:Olmeria]] | |||
Latest revision as of 20:02, 30 August 2024
 | This article is a work-in-progress because it is incomplete and pending further input from an author. Note: The contents of this article are not considered canonical and may be inaccurate. Please comment on this article's talk page to share your input, comments and questions. |
| Bettencourt v. Hjortsberg | |
|---|---|
 The case gained substantial media attention due to its constitutional significance | |
| Court | High Court of Olmeria, Supreme Court of Olmeria |
| Full case name | *Mr Pascal Bettencourt v. Hjortsberg Transactions Inc. and Partners* |
| Argued | 1 - 13 October, 21 October - 11 November 2014 |
| Submitted | 5 August 2014 |
| Started | 20 October 2014 |
| Decided | 16th November 2014 |
| Defendant | Hjortsberg Transactions Inc. and Partners |
| Prosecution | Mörner Soliciters on behalf of Pascal Bettencourt |
| Defence | Hjortsberg Transactions legal division |
| Claim | 300,000 Lund plus damages and legal fees |
| Legislation cited |
|
| Case history | |
| Appealed from | High Court of Olmeria |
| Ruling | |
| Mr Bettencourt is entitled to the same right to "privacy from corporate entities", in all their forms as all who are classed as citizens of Olmeria. Therefore we deem the actions of Hjortsberg Inc. wholly unlawful, and declare that they must pay Mr Bettencourt a total of 350,000 Lund, in addition to legal fees, in payment for their breach of his right to privacy. | |
| Court membership | |
| Judge(s) sitting | Ernman, Larsson, Pettersson, Moller, Solie, Andal, Friberg, Syrén, Grönberg, Holgersson |
| Case opinions | |
| Majority | 9-1 |
| Myre and Ness took no part in the consideration or decision of the case. | |
| Keywords | |
| Tourism, Data Breach, Data Security, Money, Finances, Corporation, Constitution, Foreigner, Yonderre | |
Bettencourt v. Hjortsberg was a high profile civil court case in Olmeria which has influenced the interpretation of Constitutional law and the application of rights to non citizens to date. Mr Pascal Bettencourt, a Yonderian tourist who visited Olmeria on holiday in June 2014, sued financial company Hjortsberg Transactions Inc. after they sold his financial details to a foreign company. Mr Bettencourt subsequently lost over Ⱡ50,000 (₮31,500) in a series of fraudulent withdrawals from three separate bank accounts.
The case was taken to the Supreme Court after Hjortsberg Transactions appealed the High Court's ruling against them on the grounds that Mr Bettencourt should not be entitled to the same right to "privacy from corporate entities", as the High Court ruling had referenced, because he was not Olmerian. The Supreme Court ruled in favour of Mr Bettencourt on the grounds of the Second Constitution of Olmeria and subsequent legislation The People's Act (1969), which they argued entitled foreign tourists to the same right to privacy as Olmerian citizens. Hjortsberg Transactions were forced to pay Ⱡ350,000 to Mr Bettencourt, in addition to legal fees and any future damages if the total ever exceeded 350,000Ⱡ.
The company also faced a wider scandal over its use of clients data, and was the subject of an official investigation by the financial regulator OFCoR later that year, which concluded with the bankrupting of the company after it was ordered to pay out millions in compensation for other victims, both Olmerian and foreign.
Background
At the time of the case, Mr Pascal Bettencourt, a native Yonderian, was aged 53 and working as a manager in an electronics firm. He visited to Olmeria for the first time with his wife and two children in a two week holiday, from the 4th to 19th June 2014. The family chose Olmeria as they had found cheap flights, and wanted to explore the colder, rural regions of the country.
Bettencourt employed the money changing services of Hjortsberg Transactions before travelling, transferring around ₮1000 into around Ⱡ1560 through the online FastChange™.
The FastChange™ system involves clients prepaying online onto a temporary card, which they can then use for a set duration in the relevant nation. Clients can also withdraw cash upon arrival in the nation, or arrange to receive part or all of their transfer in cash at the Hjortsberg facilities in most major Olmerian cities and airports.
High Court Case
