Higher education in Kiravia: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Line 78: | Line 78: | ||
The ''pro forma'' nature of the undergraduate monstration for a sizeable minority of students and the understanding that most will never be read have encouraged the submission of millions of ''amderen'' that are brazenly low-effort (example: ), patently spurious (example: ), humorous (''[https://img.ifunny.co/images/c47b9714571b7b99d2c00c5f47edd18a2b4f98a82a7900570d2371b7a3900f00_1.jpg Kantian Critique of the Noumenal versus the Personal Marius]''), unrelated to the author’s field of study (example: ), or wholly unreadable (example: ). Unabashed plagiarism was rampant in the intervening decades between the official end of substantive examination at public universities and the digitisation of academic databases. In 21208, D.F.W. Érigorivan, a professor of [[Kalvertan Coscivian|Kalvertan]] literature at [[Hanoram]]’s third-tier Spuirdun State College and a defender of substantive examination, found that between 80% and 90% of theses submitted to his institution during the three preceding years were computer-generated, with widely varying levels of sophistication and believability. Further, a full 20% of theses were duplicates or near-duplicates (most often with the title being the only point of difference). | The ''pro forma'' nature of the undergraduate monstration for a sizeable minority of students and the understanding that most will never be read have encouraged the submission of millions of ''amderen'' that are brazenly low-effort (example: ), patently spurious (example: ), humorous (''[https://img.ifunny.co/images/c47b9714571b7b99d2c00c5f47edd18a2b4f98a82a7900570d2371b7a3900f00_1.jpg Kantian Critique of the Noumenal versus the Personal Marius]''), unrelated to the author’s field of study (example: ), or wholly unreadable (example: ). Unabashed plagiarism was rampant in the intervening decades between the official end of substantive examination at public universities and the digitisation of academic databases. In 21208, D.F.W. Érigorivan, a professor of [[Kalvertan Coscivian|Kalvertan]] literature at [[Hanoram]]’s third-tier Spuirdun State College and a defender of substantive examination, found that between 80% and 90% of theses submitted to his institution during the three preceding years were computer-generated, with widely varying levels of sophistication and believability. Further, a full 20% of theses were duplicates or near-duplicates (most often with the title being the only point of difference). | ||
A growing number of schools make published theses accessible online, which has led to IxTwitter accounts that highlight especially humorous, implausible, or unusual | A growing number of schools make published theses accessible online, which has led to IxTwitter accounts that highlight especially humorous, implausible, or unusual monstration titles and abstracts. | ||
Despite this, there remain incentives for students to produce serious and high-quality theses. These include postgraduate admissions, consideration for honours, use of the | Despite this, there remain incentives for students to produce serious and high-quality theses. These include postgraduate admissions, consideration for honours, use of the monstration as a writing sample when seeking employment, personal pride, and its twin sibling parental pressure. | ||
==Selected List of Institutions== | ==Selected List of Institutions== | ||