Kiro-Audonian SakOil: Difference between revisions

Line 43:

==Political History and Future==

The confiscation of SakOil was originally intended as a temporary measure, with the [[Andrus Candrin|Candrin]] administration intending to eventually sell the company off to private investors as part of their decommunisation and economic redevelopment policy in the Kiravian Zone of Occupied Sakatia. However, this plan was interrupted by the end of the [[Shaftonist-Republican Alliance]] minority government as a result of the [[21206 Stanora Campaign Finance Scandal]] and the induction of the [[Coscivian National Congress]] into a new governing coälition with the SRA and [[~~Cadre~~ of ~~Right~~]]. Unlike the {{wp|economic liberalism|market liberal}} SRA, which oversaw massive privatisation efforts after the fall of Kirosocialism, the CNC's more {{wp|mercantilist}} and {{wp|petronationalism|petronationalist}} platform called for the creation of a state-owned hydrocarbon company to help regulate energy prices in the Federacy and generate state revenue. CNC lawmakers, who viewed the confiscation of SakOil as a fortunate shortcut through the uphill political battle of chartering such a company from scratch, demanded that the privatisation process be halted as a condition of their participation in the coälition. As a compromise, ownership of the company was handed over from the Federal government to the Government-General of Kiravian Sakatia.

The confiscation of SakOil was originally intended as a temporary measure, with the [[Andrus Candrin|Candrin]] administration intending to eventually sell the company off to private investors as part of their decommunisation and economic redevelopment policy in the Kiravian Zone of Occupied Sakatia. However, this plan was interrupted by the end of the [[Shaftonist-Republican Alliance]] minority government as a result of the [[21206 Stanora Campaign Finance Scandal]] and the induction of the [[Coscivian National Congress]] into a new governing coälition with the SRA and [[Caucus of Justice]]. Unlike the {{wp|economic liberalism|market liberal}} SRA, which oversaw massive privatisation efforts after the fall of Kirosocialism, the CNC's more {{wp|mercantilist}} and {{wp|petronationalism|petronationalist}} platform called for the creation of a state-owned hydrocarbon company to help regulate energy prices in the Federacy and generate state revenue. CNC lawmakers, who viewed the confiscation of SakOil as a fortunate shortcut through the uphill political battle of chartering such a company from scratch, demanded that the privatisation process be halted as a condition of their participation in the coälition. As a compromise, ownership of the company was handed over from the Federal government to the Government-General of Kiravian Sakatia.

Ahead of a [[LATA]] agreement to share sovereignty over former Sakatian occupation zones between the occupying powers and the [[United States of Sakatia]], the Federal government resumed ownership of the company, which remained headquartered in Sak Paré, Kiravian Sakatia.

@@ Line 43: / Line 43: @@
 ==Political History and Future==
-The confiscation of SakOil was originally intended as a temporary measure, with the [[Andrus Candrin|Candrin]] administration intending to eventually sell the company off to private investors as part of their decommunisation and economic redevelopment policy in the Kiravian Zone of Occupied Sakatia. However, this plan was interrupted by the end of the [[Shaftonist-Republican Alliance]] minority government as a result of the [[21206 Stanora Campaign Finance Scandal]] and the induction of the [[Coscivian National Congress]] into a new governing coälition with the SRA and [[Cadre of Right]]. Unlike the {{wp|economic liberalism|market liberal}} SRA, which oversaw massive privatisation efforts after the fall of Kirosocialism, the CNC's more {{wp|mercantilist}} and {{wp|petronationalism|petronationalist}} platform called for the creation of a state-owned hydrocarbon company to help regulate energy prices in the Federacy and generate state revenue. CNC lawmakers, who viewed the confiscation of SakOil as a fortunate shortcut through the uphill political battle of chartering such a company from scratch, demanded that the privatisation process be halted as a condition of their participation in the coälition. As a compromise, ownership of the company was handed over from the Federal government to the Government-General of Kiravian Sakatia.
+The confiscation of SakOil was originally intended as a temporary measure, with the [[Andrus Candrin|Candrin]] administration intending to eventually sell the company off to private investors as part of their decommunisation and economic redevelopment policy in the Kiravian Zone of Occupied Sakatia. However, this plan was interrupted by the end of the [[Shaftonist-Republican Alliance]] minority government as a result of the [[21206 Stanora Campaign Finance Scandal]] and the induction of the [[Coscivian National Congress]] into a new governing coälition with the SRA and [[Caucus of Justice]]. Unlike the {{wp|economic liberalism|market liberal}} SRA, which oversaw massive privatisation efforts after the fall of Kirosocialism, the CNC's more {{wp|mercantilist}} and {{wp|petronationalism|petronationalist}} platform called for the creation of a state-owned hydrocarbon company to help regulate energy prices in the Federacy and generate state revenue. CNC lawmakers, who viewed the confiscation of SakOil as a fortunate shortcut through the uphill political battle of chartering such a company from scratch, demanded that the privatisation process be halted as a condition of their participation in the coälition. As a compromise, ownership of the company was handed over from the Federal government to the Government-General of Kiravian Sakatia.
 Ahead of a [[LATA]] agreement to share sovereignty over former Sakatian occupation zones between the occupying powers and the [[United States of Sakatia]], the Federal government resumed ownership of the company, which remained headquartered in Sak Paré, Kiravian Sakatia.

Kiro-Audonian SakOil: Difference between revisions

Navigation menu