Kiravian Marxist philosophy: Difference between revisions

Jump to navigation Jump to search
mNo edit summary
Tag: 2017 source edit
No edit summary
Tag: 2017 source edit
Line 1: Line 1:
'''Kiravian Marxist philosophy''' (Coscivian: ''Kiravix Marxirisex Vódakéna'') is the philosophy of {{wp|dialectical materialism}} as introduced to Kiravia in the late 1800s ''anno Domini'' and subsequently practiced in academic and political settings in Kiravia. Kiravian Marxist philosophy heavily informed the formulation of [[Kirosocialism|Kirosocialist ideology]] and enjoyed wide-reaching state sponsorship and influence under single-party Kirosocialist rule. Although doctrinnaire Marxist thought in universities and in mainstream politics largely fell by the wayside after the end of the Kirosocialist régime, it survives in pockets of Kiravian academia to the current day and has left a lasting legacy on the social sciences in Kiravia.
'''Kiravian Marxist philosophy''' (Coscivian: ''Kiravix Marxirisēx Vódakéna'') is the philosophy of {{wp|dialectical materialism}} as introduced to Kiravia in the late 1800s ''anno Domini'' and subsequently practiced in academic and political settings in Kiravia. Kiravian Marxist philosophy heavily informed the formulation of [[Kirosocialism|Kirosocialist ideology]] and enjoyed wide-reaching state sponsorship and influence under single-party Kirosocialist rule. Although doctrinnaire Marxist thought in universities and in mainstream politics largely fell by the wayside after the end of the Kirosocialist régime, it survives in pockets of Kiravian academia to the current day and has left a lasting legacy on the social sciences in Kiravia.


Marxist philosophy was initially imported into Kiravia between 18XX and 1900, in translations from {{wp|Castilian language|Agrilian}}, {{wp|Portuguese language|Lusonic}}, and [[Julian Ænglish|Ænglish]], beginning with an 18XX translation of ''Capital'' from Agrilian into [[High Coscivian]] by D. Trédavius Thassan.
Marxist philosophy was initially imported into Kiravia between 18XX and 1900, in translations from {{wp|Castilian language|Agrilian}}, {{wp|Portuguese language|Lusonic}}, and [[Julian Ænglish|Ænglish]], beginning with an 18XX translation of ''Capital'' from Agrilian into [[High Coscivian]] by D. Trédavius Thassan.
Line 8: Line 8:


==New School==
==New School==
==Old School Revival==
Beginning with the XXth Politburo, the Kirosocialist Party turned decisively away from the efforts of New School Marxist studies. Politburo member N.R. Sakitorin said in a speech before the XYth meeting of the National (formerly Central) Committee "Of what utility are studies on ploughshare designs and the marginalia of copyhold leases under Sarpic despotism to the socialist project in Kiravia and the Coscivian world? Marx discovered fundamental and universal truths about the nature and development of human societies, but we do nothing to serve the labouring majority of the Coscivian peoples by running our quillpens through the work of this Party's founders - our revolutionary forefathers - to correct their alleged errors and bring our theoretical canon into ever-closer conformity with that of our revolutionary cousins on those benighted continents. Our duty is to apply the transformative insights of Marxist analysis to our own context and our own conditions, in our own language, so that we may advance socialism and human liberation in our own civilisation." The move toward an ideological line of "Socialism with Coscivian characteristics" led to renewed interest in Old School Kiro-Marxist writings as Kirosocialist theoreticians sought to apply Marxian analysis to local material conditions without reference to Occidental history or later developments in Occidental Marxist thought. 


==Post-Kirosocialist history and Neo-Marxian philosophy==
==Post-Kirosocialist history and Neo-Marxian philosophy==