South Coscivians: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Line 121: | Line 121: | ||
==Identity and Politics== | ==Identity and Politics== | ||
South Coscivian ethno-regional identity emerged during the {{wp|early modern period}} in response to the contentious politics of the era, regional rivalries, and the pressures of modernisation on the traditional Southern lifestyle and economy. | |||
[Evolution and consolidation of South Coscivian ethnic identity] | [Evolution and consolidation of South Coscivian ethnic identity]<br> | ||
[Contrarian regional identity] | [Contrarian regional identity]<br> | ||
[Ethnic vs. regional nature] | [Ethnic vs. regional nature]<br> | ||
South Coscivians have strong {{wp|traditionalism|traditionalist}} and {{wp|agrarianism|agrarian}} leanings in politics. On the state level, their general attitude of deference to authority and strong preference for stability and continuity have led to the establishment of {{wp|dominant party state|dominant-party systems}} under the rule of parties affiliated with the Southern Green-Right conference. Most opposition parties are affiliated with the [[Agrarian Caucus]], Organic Social Union, or the [[Minor Kiravian Political Parties#Monarchist Party|Monarchist Parties of Kiravia]], and have limited influence. | South Coscivians have strong {{wp|traditionalism|traditionalist}} and {{wp|agrarianism|agrarian}} leanings in politics. On the state level, their general attitude of deference to authority and strong preference for stability and continuity have led to the establishment of {{wp|dominant party state|dominant-party systems}} under the rule of parties affiliated with the Southern Green-Right conference. Most opposition parties are affiliated with the [[Agrarian Caucus]], Organic Social Union, or the [[Minor Kiravian Political Parties#Monarchist Party|Monarchist Parties of Kiravia]], and have limited influence. | ||