User:Kir/Sandbox3: Difference between revisions

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
-YEET
+== Driznaft: Kiravians in the Crusades ==
+{| class="wikitable"
+|+ Caption text
+|-
+! Notes
+|-
+| ‣ Melians and Sydona are key<br> ‣ Need to coørdinate with Banglazesh
+ ‣ t. Urcea pro:
+  ‣ i think you're actually best positioned for crusades to naturally lead into kiravian empire abroad
+    loose coscivians would be all over crusading
+    coscivian crusader states everywhere
+    the states continue to exist just sort of due to lack of opposition and inertia until ideas about like
+    Great Coscivia and political unity of these places comes about later
+    granted a crusader state surviving until the 17th century at earliest is a long time
+    are there any analogous pre nationalism movements like this? would be worth researching
+  ‣ the less fun but more plausible option ends up being like Coscivian noble families in these places keep dying out, causing more and more distant relations to be
+    more or less forced to assume them overseas while being increasingly more poor and irrelevant, such that you end up having prosperous Kiravians basically passing      up foreign thrones
+    and in many cases they just end up being bequeathed to the kiravian state
+    whch i think would bebest for the melians as the crusader state par excellence unless you have something in mind for them
+‣ Some form of escheat where heirless lands and titles revert to His Marbliness
+|}

Navigation menu