Apostolic King of Urcea: Difference between revisions

Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 28: Line 28:


== Origin ==
== Origin ==
{{SeeAlso|Constitutional history of Urcea}}
{{Further|Constitutional history of Urcea}}
The Julian Throne as a Royal institution was created by the [[Golden Bull of 1098]], elevating the Archduke-Grand Duke of Urceopolis and Harren respectively, both historic possessions of the [[Julian dynasty]], to the rank of King. The development of the [[Constitution of Urcea]] throughout the second millennia brought about ebbs and flows of Royal authority. The decline of the optimate nobility and power of the [[Estates of Urcea]] increased the power of the Apostolic King to a height in the late 1600s and early 1700s. This followed by increasing constitutional prerogatives for the [[Concilium Daoni]] and various royal concessions which have created the modern Constitution and [[Government of Urcea]], in which the Apostolic King holds full sovereignty but may only exercise Royal authority in a very strict set of circumstances. Nevertheless, the Apostolic Kingship has retained the religious and moral significance it acquired during the Medieval period. [[Democratic Labor Party v. His Most Christian Majesty's Government|Case law]] has posited that the position of Apostolic King is not a public office in the traditional sense but rather is an "indelible personal characteristic" of the man on the Julian Throne.
The Julian Throne as a Royal institution was created by the [[Golden Bull of 1098]], elevating the Archduke-Grand Duke of Urceopolis and Harren respectively, both historic possessions of the [[Julian dynasty]], to the rank of King. The development of the [[Constitution of Urcea]] throughout the second millennia brought about ebbs and flows of Royal authority. The decline of the optimate nobility and power of the [[Estates of Urcea]] increased the power of the Apostolic King to a height in the late 1600s and early 1700s. This followed by increasing constitutional prerogatives for the [[Concilium Daoni]] and various royal concessions which have created the modern Constitution and [[Government of Urcea]], in which the Apostolic King holds full sovereignty but may only exercise Royal authority in a very strict set of circumstances. Nevertheless, the Apostolic Kingship has retained the religious and moral significance it acquired during the Medieval period. [[Democratic Labor Party v. His Most Christian Majesty's Government|Case law]] has posited that the position of Apostolic King is not a public office in the traditional sense but rather is an "indelible personal characteristic" of the man on the Julian Throne.