Animal rights by country: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
mNo edit summary Tag: 2017 source edit |
m (Text replacement - "Corumm" to "Daxia") |
||
| Line 35: | Line 35: | ||
| {{yes}} | | {{yes}} | ||
|- | |- | ||
|{{flag| | |{{flag|Daxia}} | ||
| {{no}} | | {{no}} | ||
|{{yes}} | |{{yes}} | ||
| Line 185: | Line 185: | ||
|<small>Laws typically handled at state level, and often are the result of the first ruling court's decision (or state/territorial supreme court). Although it is illegal in all states to perform cosmetic testing on animals (federal law), Cartadania does indiscriminately import products from countries where it is permitted. Marine mammal captivity is a topic of common debate and regulations in force in the states where it is permitted tend to be very strict.</small> | |<small>Laws typically handled at state level, and often are the result of the first ruling court's decision (or state/territorial supreme court). Although it is illegal in all states to perform cosmetic testing on animals (federal law), Cartadania does indiscriminately import products from countries where it is permitted. Marine mammal captivity is a topic of common debate and regulations in force in the states where it is permitted tend to be very strict.</small> | ||
|- | |- | ||
|{{flag| | |{{flag|Daxia}} | ||
|{{yes C|}} | |{{yes C|}} | ||
|{{yes C|}} | |{{yes C|}} | ||