2030 Urcean elections: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Line 79: | Line 79: | ||
Abroad, cultural, economic, and physical reconstruction of most nations aligned with [[Urcea]] in [[Crona]] still continued as of 2030. The [[League-occupied Varshan|League of Nations occupation of Varshan]] entered its sixth year. While the [[Algosh Republic]] had been partly reconstructed and held its first full elections concurrently with Urcea's, a significant amount of public resources were being sent to Crona. The National Pact began to make the argument in [[2029]] that a sharp winddown of aid by [[2032]] would have the intended effect of building self-sufficiency in the [[Nysdra]] region by necessity, while Solidarity and the minor parties pushed against this notion, stating that such a cut off would adversely affect relations with Urcea's Cronan allies. | Abroad, cultural, economic, and physical reconstruction of most nations aligned with [[Urcea]] in [[Crona]] still continued as of 2030. The [[League-occupied Varshan|League of Nations occupation of Varshan]] entered its sixth year. While the [[Algosh Republic]] had been partly reconstructed and held its first full elections concurrently with Urcea's, a significant amount of public resources were being sent to Crona. The National Pact began to make the argument in [[2029]] that a sharp winddown of aid by [[2032]] would have the intended effect of building self-sufficiency in the [[Nysdra]] region by necessity, while Solidarity and the minor parties pushed against this notion, stating that such a cut off would adversely affect relations with Urcea's Cronan allies. | ||
Exit polls on election night showed consensus among members of all parties that Urcea "needs to stay the course" in [[Crona]] (64% of all Urceans said so), although Solidarity members were willing to commit to many more years than members of any other party. With respect to the domestic economy, voters were more divided. 48% of Urceans - a plurality - thought Solidarity "needed to recommit to domestic economic growth". | Exit polls on election night showed consensus among members of all parties that Urcea "needs to stay the course" in [[Crona]] (64% of all Urceans said so), although Solidarity members were willing to commit to many more years than members of any other party. With respect to the domestic economy, voters were more divided. 48% of Urceans - a plurality - thought Solidarity "needed to recommit to domestic economic growth" beyond just an ideological commitment to the [[Model Economy]]. | ||
===Model Economy=== | ===Model Economy=== | ||