321
edits
Restarkism: Difference between revisions
m
→Principles
m (→Etymology) Tag: 2017 source edit |
m (→Principles) Tag: 2017 source edit |
||
| Line 23: | Line 23: | ||
Republicanism, sometimes rendered as the power of politics, is defined as the creation of a republic where sovereignty is recognized in the people, and the people alone. Kalma states his inspiration in the original [[Latin]] ''res publica'', meaning “public affair”. Therefore, Restarkist republicanism asserts that a state should be organized in a way in which the individual may have stewardship over political affairs in the state framework, asserting the principles of {{wp|democracy}}, {{wp|popular sovereignty}}, and {{wp|rule of law}}. Restarkism further asserts that as a “public affair”, political deliberations must be {{wp|secular}} and for the creation of good material conditions for the public to thrive on Earth. | Republicanism, sometimes rendered as the power of politics, is defined as the creation of a republic where sovereignty is recognized in the people, and the people alone. Kalma states his inspiration in the original [[Latin]] ''res publica'', meaning “public affair”. Therefore, Restarkist republicanism asserts that a state should be organized in a way in which the individual may have stewardship over political affairs in the state framework, asserting the principles of {{wp|democracy}}, {{wp|popular sovereignty}}, and {{wp|rule of law}}. Restarkism further asserts that as a “public affair”, political deliberations must be {{wp|secular}} and for the creation of good material conditions for the public to thrive on Earth. | ||
The Restarkist republic is a {{wp|parliamentary system|parliamentary}} {{wp|constitutional republic}}. It has a parliament, or [[National Stanera]], chosen by representative elections, with a popularly-elected non-executive {{wp|president}} appointing a [[Prime Executive]] to serve as the {{wp|head of government}}. There is no {[wp|seperation of powers}}, the legislative branch holds primacy over the executive branch and may compel it to resign through a motion of no-confidence. It is also a {{wp|federal state}}, as Restarkism asserts that communities of persons within the larger community of the nation hold rights. These communities are represented in a {[wp|upper house}}, the [[Procuracy Council]]. | The Restarkist republic is a {{wp|parliamentary system|parliamentary}} {{wp|constitutional republic}}. It has a parliament, or [[National Stanera]], chosen by representative elections, with a popularly-elected non-executive {{wp|president}} appointing a [[Prime Executive]] to serve as the {{wp|head of government}}. There is no {[wp|seperation of powers}}, the legislative branch holds primacy over the executive branch and may compel it to resign through a motion of no-confidence. It is also a {{wp|federal state}}, as Restarkism asserts that communities of persons within the larger community of the nation hold rights. These communities are represented in a {{[wp|upper house}}, the [[Procuracy Council]]. | ||
===Judicialism (power of governance)=== | ===Judicialism (power of governance)=== | ||
Judicialism, sometimes rendered as the power of governance or statism, asserts that the state has the power of governance of the nation. It can be defined as creating an “edifice” of the state: politics and the individual may, in the system of the state, steer the Restarkist state but not overcome it. Judicialism therefore enshrines the creation of a state structure defined by an apolitical {{wp|civil service}}, an independent judiciary, a system of {{wp|checks and balances}}, a professional {{wp|military}} and the enshrinement of the {{wp|rule of law}}. | Judicialism, sometimes rendered as the power of governance or statism, asserts that the state has the power of governance of the nation. It can be defined as creating an “edifice” of the state: politics and the individual may, in the system of the state, steer the Restarkist state but not overcome it. Judicialism therefore enshrines the creation of a state structure defined by an apolitical {{wp|civil service}}, an independent judiciary, a system of {{wp|checks and balances}}, a professional {{wp|military}} and the enshrinement of the {{wp|rule of law}}. | ||
The power of governance asserts a responsibility of governance in the Restarkist philosophy. The edifice of the state must protect the rights of an individual as guaranteed by the Fundamental Statute. It must also prevent the {{wp|tyranny of the majority}}, and therefore defend itself and its institutions. Kalma gave this role to the military, which has invoked it in multiple {{ | The power of governance asserts a responsibility of governance in the Restarkist philosophy. The edifice of the state must protect the rights of an individual as guaranteed by the Fundamental Statute. It must also prevent the {{wp|tyranny of the majority}}, and therefore defend itself and its institutions. Kalma gave this role to the military, which has invoked it in multiple {{wp|Coup d'état|coups d'état}} when it perceived the undermining of the state. | ||
The Restarkist state, with the power of governance of the nation, has also been interpreted to mean the primacy of the state in the modernization and development of the Cape. Kalma intended it as a direct criticism of the ills of {{wp|capitalism}}, proposing the state use its power of governance defend the people from those conceived ills. The nation’s {{wp|social welfare}} system and strong regulatory bodies are a legacy thereof. Today, it is widely believed that Kalma was a socialist, although judicialism has been largely interpreted by his [[Republican Nationalist Party]] to mean a form of social democracy. | The Restarkist state, with the power of governance of the nation, has also been interpreted to mean the primacy of the state in the modernization and development of the Cape. Kalma intended it as a direct criticism of the ills of {{wp|capitalism}}, proposing the state use its power of governance defend the people from those conceived ills. The nation’s {{wp|social welfare}} system and strong regulatory bodies are a legacy thereof. Today, it is widely believed that Kalma was a socialist, although judicialism has been largely interpreted by his [[Republican Nationalist Party]] to mean a form of social democracy. | ||