321
edits
Restarkism: Difference between revisions
m
→Restarkism and Cape politics
m (→Principles) |
|||
| Line 43: | Line 43: | ||
==Analysis== | ==Analysis== | ||
===Restarkism and Cape politics=== | ===Restarkism and Cape politics=== | ||
The [[Republican Nationalist Party]] was established by Kalma shortly after the foundation of the Federacy of the Cape in 1871. The Republican Nationalist Party has continued to update and change the philosophical roots and interpretations of Restarkism to fit the time and situation. As an example, it renounced Kalma’s nationalist ideal of {{wp|neutrality}} and non-interference during the [[Great War]] as the RNP and the Cape aligned itself with anti-communist forces against the [[Austral Democratic People’s Republic]]. With this constant adjustment, Restarkism has remained the popular ideology of the | The [[Republican Nationalist Party]] was established by Kalma shortly after the foundation of the Federacy of the Cape in 1871. The Republican Nationalist Party has continued to update and change the philosophical roots and interpretations of Restarkism to fit the time and situation. As an example, it renounced Kalma’s nationalist ideal of {{wp|neutrality}} and non-interference during the [[Great War]] as the RNP and the Cape aligned itself with anti-communist forces against the [[Austral Democratic People’s Republic]]. With this constant adjustment, Restarkism has remained the popular ideology of the centre. | ||
===Restarkism outside the Cape=== | ===Restarkism outside the Cape=== | ||
| Line 55: | Line 55: | ||
*'''Socialist RNs''', who take a more socialist interpretation of the principles of reformism and judicialism. Socialists seek to use the statism laid out by judicialism to protect the economic equality of the individual, embracing the use of the state to reform society into a {{wp|democratic socialist}} one. Many of the party’s socialist and {{wp|trade unionist}} members would be considered socialists. | *'''Socialist RNs''', who take a more socialist interpretation of the principles of reformism and judicialism. Socialists seek to use the statism laid out by judicialism to protect the economic equality of the individual, embracing the use of the state to reform society into a {{wp|democratic socialist}} one. Many of the party’s socialist and {{wp|trade unionist}} members would be considered socialists. | ||
*'''Liberal RNs''', who take a liberal interpretation of the principles of reformism and judicialism. They seek to use the state to protect individual and economic rights. They interpret judicialism to mean state intervention in the economy only when necessary for the public good, and the further establishment of welfare. They align closely with {{wp|social democracy}}, | *'''Liberal RNs''', who take a liberal interpretation of the principles of reformism and judicialism. They seek to use the state to protect individual and economic rights. They interpret judicialism to mean state intervention in the economy only when necessary for the public good, and the further establishment of welfare. They align closely with {{wp|social democracy}}, although {{wp|neoliberalism}} remains a force in the liberal faction. | ||
*'''Conservative RNs''', who prioritize republicanism and nationalism. They adhere closely to {{wp|neoconservatism}}, de-emphasizing the role of the judicialist state in the economy and in politics, and emphasizing nationalism. Many of the party’s {{wp|liberal conservatism|liberal conservatives}}s are considered Conservative RNs. The principle of reformism prevents {{wp|social conservatism}} in the party. | *'''Conservative RNs''', who prioritize republicanism and nationalism. They adhere closely to {{wp|neoconservatism}}, de-emphasizing the role of the judicialist state in the economy and in politics, and emphasizing nationalism. Many of the party’s {{wp|liberal conservatism|liberal conservatives}}s are considered Conservative RNs. The principle of reformism prevents {{wp|social conservatism}} in the party. | ||
==See also== | ==See also== | ||