Federalist Republican Alliance: Difference between revisions

*'''Conservative SRs''' take a more {{wp|developmentalism|developmentalist}} approach toward economic policy that continues the caucus' initial policies under the Kólsylvar and Rénkédar administrations to manage the transition away from Kirosocialism. The Conservatives embrace the use of {{wp|industrial policy}}, {{wp|indicative planning}}, subsidies, among other means, to sustain high growth rates, strengthen international competitiveness, and maximise exports. The Conservatives take a technocratic and corporatist approach to regulatory planning, and have close ties with the [[Kiravian Economic Executive]] bureaucracy and {{wp|trade associations}}. Members of the caucus' {{wp|national conservative}}, {{wp|modern liberalism|social-liberal}}, {{wp|neoconservative}}, and {{wp|agrarianism|agrarian}} tendencies are most likely to be classified as Conservative SRs.

*'''Liberal SRs''' adhere more closely to {{wp|economic liberalism}}, believing that the Clarendonomics policies of the post-Kirosocialist transition period are no longer appropriate in a "mature" market economy. They support {{wp|fiscal conservatism}}, trade liberalisation, cutting regulations and the regulatory bureaucracy, stronger {{wp|competition law}}, and creating a more seamless internal market by harmonising tax and regulatory policies among the federal subjects. Liberal SRs have strong ties with the financial industry and a constellation of policy think-tanks. Liberal SRs are most often associated with {{wp|liberal conservatism|liberal conservative}}, {{wp|libertarian conservatism|libertarian conservative}}, and {{wp|neoliberal}} ideology.

*'''Reform SRs''' join the Liberals in their opposition to technocratic economic planning by the federal government, but seek to balance and synthesise economic liberalisation with other priorities such as {{wp|social policy}}, {{wp|environmental policy}}, addressing regional disparities in economic development, and cultural integrity. Reformists champion {{wp|subsidiarity}} and devolution of domestic economic policy to lower levels of government, policies favourable to small and medium enterprises, public-private partnerships and {{wp|social enterprise}}. Primarily mainstream [[Shaftonist democracy|Shaftonist democrats]], Reform SRs may also be identified with {{wp|conservative liberalism}}, {{wp|Christian democracy}}, {{wp|neoconservatism}}, and {{wp|radical centrism}}.