Political ideologies in Castadilla: Difference between revisions
Created page with "Formal '''political ideologies in Castadilla''' are aligned based upon the {{wp|left-right political spectrum}}, an axis used to classify political positions in relation to their emphasis on either social equality or social hierarchy. Most Castadillaans identify as at least one of four main ideologies: {{wp|socialism}}, {{wp|liberalism}}, {{wp|conservatism}}, and {{wp|nationalism}}; it is very common for one to identify as being any combination of two of the four main id..." Tag: 2017 source edit |
mNo edit summary Tag: 2017 source edit |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Formal '''political ideologies in Castadilla''' are aligned based upon the {{wp|left-right political spectrum}}, an axis used to classify political positions in relation to their emphasis on either social equality or social hierarchy. Most Castadillaans identify as at least one of four main ideologies: {{wp|socialism}}, {{wp|liberalism}}, {{wp|conservatism}}, and {{wp|nationalism}}; it is very common for one to identify as being any combination of two of the four main ideologies, with {{wp|political polarization|political polarisation}} being largely miniscule for the most part thanks to the four ideological groups more or less cooperating with each other during the era of the provisional government after the end of the [[Velvet Revolution]]. | Formal '''political ideologies in Castadilla''' are aligned based upon the {{wp|left-right political spectrum}}, an axis used to classify political positions in relation to their emphasis on either social equality or social hierarchy. Most [[Castadillaans]] identify as at least one of four main ideologies: {{wp|socialism}}, {{wp|liberalism}}, {{wp|conservatism}}, and {{wp|nationalism}}; it is very common for one to identify as being any combination of two of the four main ideologies, with {{wp|political polarization|political polarisation}} being largely miniscule for the most part thanks to the four ideological groups more or less cooperating with each other during the era of the provisional government after the end of the [[Velvet Revolution]]. | ||
[[Castadilla]], alongside [[Pelaxia]], have often been called the "cradle of socialism", and the main subsections within modern [[Socialism in Castadilla|Castadillaan socialism]] include [[Velvetine Socialism]], [[Cabacero Socialism]], and even various flavours of socialist-aligned {{wp|social democracy}}; the former two having emerged from the Velvetine faction of the Velvet Revolution while the latter developed throughout the latter half of the 19th Century and had gained prominence as the left-wing faction of the anti-Pascualist opposition groups which were formed in the late 1940s. [[Liberalism in Castadilla|Castadillaan liberalism]] traces its lineage back to the late 18th Century as the result of the initial {{wp|egalitarianism|egalitarian}} ethos of early [[Delepasians|Delepasian]] nationalism (not to be confused with [[Delepasian exceptionalism]]) as well as {{wp|constitutionalism}} and even {{wp|republicanism}}; in recent years, Castadillaan liberalism has been closely aligned with {{wp|neoliberalism}}. [[Conservatism in Castadilla]] mostly emerged as a response to the rise of liberal ideologies in the early 19th Century and has historically enjoyed close relations with the [[Catholic Church]], and in the present is most often associated with {{wp|christian democracy}}. Modern-day [[Nationalism in Castadilla|Castadillaan nationalism]] is most commonly associated with various flavours of Delepasian exceptionalism, though more moderate and less exclusionary forms of nationalism do exist across the political spectrum with the most prominent being [[Velvetine Socialism#Castadillaanism|Castadillaanism]]. | |||
The earliest instances of political ideologies in what is now Castadilla began with the emergence of Delepasian nationalism in the late 18th Century which challenged the long-standing notion that the colonists of the [[Viceroyalty of Los Rumas]] were [[Pelaxia|Pelaxians]]. The rise of the nascent Delepasian identity would lead to the emergence of {{wp|constitutionalism}} and even {{wp|republicanism}} as calls for Delepasian self-government began to emerge. The latter years of Pelaxian colonial rule and the brief time that the [[Delepasian Kingdom]] had existed would see Delepasian nationalism split into new ideologies, including [[Delepasian Royalism|royalism]], [[Delepasian National Constitutionalism|national constitutionalism]], and [[Delepasian National Republicanism|national republicanism]]. In the years following the collapse of the short-lived Delepasian Kingdom, [[foralism]] and {{wp|confederalism}} became the predominant ideologies of the new [[Delepasian Confederation|confederation]]. The rise of the [[Estado Social (Castadilla)|Estado Social]] in the mid-1920s would see the rise of [[National Renewal Party|Pascualism]] as well as the institutionalisation of [[Delepasian exceptionalism]]; modern forms of liberalism, conservatism, and socialism would develop in response to Pascualist rule with all three ideological groups committing themselves to promoting a more democratic form of government. The finalisation of the development of the modern political ideologies in Castadilla would end in the late 1990s after the end of the Velvet Revolution, with Velvetine Socialism and {{wp|national conservatism}} being some of the most prominent ideological developments. | The earliest instances of political ideologies in what is now Castadilla began with the emergence of Delepasian nationalism in the late 18th Century which challenged the long-standing notion that the colonists of the [[Viceroyalty of Los Rumas]] were [[Pelaxia|Pelaxians]]. The rise of the nascent Delepasian identity would lead to the emergence of {{wp|constitutionalism}} and even {{wp|republicanism}} as calls for Delepasian self-government began to emerge. The latter years of Pelaxian colonial rule and the brief time that the [[Delepasian Kingdom]] had existed would see Delepasian nationalism split into new ideologies, including [[Delepasian Royalism|royalism]], [[Delepasian National Constitutionalism|national constitutionalism]], and [[Delepasian National Republicanism|national republicanism]]. In the years following the collapse of the short-lived Delepasian Kingdom, [[foralism]] and {{wp|confederalism}} became the predominant ideologies of the new [[Delepasian Confederation|confederation]]. The rise of the [[Estado Social (Castadilla)|Estado Social]] in the mid-1920s would see the rise of [[National Renewal Party|Pascualism]] as well as the institutionalisation of [[Delepasian exceptionalism]]; modern forms of liberalism, conservatism, and socialism would develop in response to Pascualist rule with all three ideological groups committing themselves to promoting a more democratic form of government. The finalisation of the development of the modern political ideologies in Castadilla would end in the late 1990s after the end of the Velvet Revolution, with Velvetine Socialism and {{wp|national conservatism}} being some of the most prominent ideological developments. | ||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
==History== | ==History== | ||
===Early Delepasianism=== | ===Early Delepasianism=== | ||
The earliest instances of formal political ideologies in what is now Castadilla first emerged in the late 18th Century after the end of the [[Carto-Pelaxian Commonwealth]] in 1792. With the loss of modern-day [[Cartadania]] during the partitions and thus the end of the perceived privilege that the [[Cartadanians]] had held, the colonists in the [[Viceroyalty of Los Rumas]] began to assert themselves politically with the rise of [[Delepasians|Delepasian]] nationalism. Early Delepasian nationalists, such as the famed poet and author [[Juan Guerrero]] who coined the term "Delepasian" in 1797, were largely influenced by the Kilikas Enlightenment and thus professed early {{wp|liberalism|liberal}} ideas such as {{wp|constitutionalism}} and even {{wp|republicanism}}; many early nationalists wanted a "crowned republic" where a liberal government is established on the basis of {{wp|popular sovereignty}} with a {{wp|meritocracy|meritocratic}} political elite who would be in charge of leadership while the monarch served as a purely cultural and symbolic figurehead with no political power. This stood in direct opposition to long-standing notion that the colonists in the Viceroyalty identified as being [[Pelaxia|Pelaxians]], a notion that was supported by opponents of Delepasianism who were still loyal to the monarchy and the old aristocracy. | |||
Delepasianism, particularly the radical "pure {{wp|republicanism|republican}}" faction, first entered into mainstream Pelaxian politics during the years of the [[First Pelaxian Republic]]. Although a form of nationalism, Delepasianism was closely-aligned to the beliefs of the staunch Pelaxian republican and Enlightenment thinker [[Luciano Valera]] who happened to be one of the three leaders of the First Republic; for many early Delepasianists, Valera's views were in support for Delepasian representation in the Pelaxian government, and many prominent officials during the First Republic, such as famed proto-socialist thinker [[Ernesto Chavez]], were Delepasian. Delepasianism was the first major ideology in what is now Castadilla, and it served as the foundation for modern forms of socialism, liberalism, conservatism, and even nationalism in Castadilla. | |||
===Late colonial era and Delepasian Kingdom=== | ===Late colonial era and Delepasian Kingdom=== | ||
The end of the First Pelaxian Republic and the restoration of the Girojon monarchy in 1814 saw the rise in counter-Enlightenment thought in opposition to the liberal ideals that were championed for the past decade. This new ideological thought, while it took in certain ideas from early Delepasianism such as nationalism and constitutionalism, was very supportive of the Girojon monarchy, the old aristocracy, and the [[Catholic Church]], seeing all three institutions as being a core aspect of the social hierarchy in Pelaxia. These new conservatives, known as "[[Delepasian Royalism|Modern Royalists]]" or simply as "Royalists", still saw potential in some of the ideas that have emerged from the Enlightenment, but they still called for these ideas to be tempered and moderated to ensure a stable and orderly society. They did, however, believe that Delepasians were entitled to their own government, a new kingdom that would serve as one half of a {{wp|real union}} between them and Pelaxia known as the [[Pelaxio-Delepasian Union]]. The Royalists saw this proposal for a "dual monarchy" to be the only way to ensure Delepasian loyalty to the Pelaxian crown while also giving them full authority to handle their own internal affairs without running afoul of future policies made in Albalitor. | |||
Delepasianism itself would be split into two new liberal camps. Moderate liberals, who have emphasised {{wp|constitutionalism}} over {{wp|republicanism}}, would be known as "[[Delepasian National Constitutionalism|National Constitutionalists]]". National Constitutionalists still advocated for {{wp|popular sovereignty}} and {{wp|meritocracy}}, but under a "liberal monarchy" wherein the monarch's power shall be limited by a constitution and that power will instead be in the hands of the meritocratic elite, who would handle the day-to-day governance. Unlike the Royalists, who still wished to remain as close to the Pelaxian crown as possible, the National Constitutionalists called for an independent Delepasian state that would either be under a {{wp|personal union}} with Pelaxia or under the rule of a cadet branch of the Girojons; the former option would necessitate the retention of the office of the Viceroy as representative of the Pelaxian monarchy while the latter would see the office of the Viceroy be renamed to Prefect to the Crown. The status of aristocracy in the new Delepasian state would be debated upon, but most National Constitutionalist factions were largely hostile to the idea of establishing a new aristocracy. | |||
The more radical camps of Delepasianism, those who have emphasised republicanism over constitutionalism, would be become the "[[Delepasian National Republicanism|National Republicans]]". Like the National Constitutionalists, the National Republicans advocated for a liberal, independent Delepasian state governed by the principles of popular sovereignty and meritocracy. Unlike the National Constitutionalists, however, the National Republicans called for a republican form of government modelled after the triumvirate republic that ruled the First Pelaxian Republic; they did, however, made some modifications to their ideal form of government through inserting additional checks and balances which would have ensured orderly governance without the instability that had plagued the First Republic. The National Republicans were themselves split into multiple factions ranging from moderate liberals who were not unlike the National Constitutionalists to more radical liberals and even proto-socialists; most of these proto-socialists, inspired by the philosophy of Ernesto Chavez, were the forefathers of {{wp|utopian socialism}}, an umbrella term used to derisively refer to pre-Marxist forms of socialism. | |||
These three ideological currents were predominant throughout the latter years of the colonial era and especially during the brief [[Delepasian Kingdom]] which came into existence after the Pelaxian monarchy was abolished permanently in 1852. The intense rivalry between the three groups would prove to be the kingdom's downfall, however, with the kingdom collapsing three months after its formation. | |||
===Foralist era=== | ===Foralist era=== | ||
Revision as of 11:04, 31 July 2024
Formal political ideologies in Castadilla are aligned based upon the left-right political spectrum, an axis used to classify political positions in relation to their emphasis on either social equality or social hierarchy. Most Castadillaans identify as at least one of four main ideologies: socialism, liberalism, conservatism, and nationalism; it is very common for one to identify as being any combination of two of the four main ideologies, with political polarisation being largely miniscule for the most part thanks to the four ideological groups more or less cooperating with each other during the era of the provisional government after the end of the Velvet Revolution.
Castadilla, alongside Pelaxia, have often been called the "cradle of socialism", and the main subsections within modern Castadillaan socialism include Velvetine Socialism, Cabacero Socialism, and even various flavours of socialist-aligned social democracy; the former two having emerged from the Velvetine faction of the Velvet Revolution while the latter developed throughout the latter half of the 19th Century and had gained prominence as the left-wing faction of the anti-Pascualist opposition groups which were formed in the late 1940s. Castadillaan liberalism traces its lineage back to the late 18th Century as the result of the initial egalitarian ethos of early Delepasian nationalism (not to be confused with Delepasian exceptionalism) as well as constitutionalism and even republicanism; in recent years, Castadillaan liberalism has been closely aligned with neoliberalism. Conservatism in Castadilla mostly emerged as a response to the rise of liberal ideologies in the early 19th Century and has historically enjoyed close relations with the Catholic Church, and in the present is most often associated with christian democracy. Modern-day Castadillaan nationalism is most commonly associated with various flavours of Delepasian exceptionalism, though more moderate and less exclusionary forms of nationalism do exist across the political spectrum with the most prominent being Castadillaanism.
The earliest instances of political ideologies in what is now Castadilla began with the emergence of Delepasian nationalism in the late 18th Century which challenged the long-standing notion that the colonists of the Viceroyalty of Los Rumas were Pelaxians. The rise of the nascent Delepasian identity would lead to the emergence of constitutionalism and even republicanism as calls for Delepasian self-government began to emerge. The latter years of Pelaxian colonial rule and the brief time that the Delepasian Kingdom had existed would see Delepasian nationalism split into new ideologies, including royalism, national constitutionalism, and national republicanism. In the years following the collapse of the short-lived Delepasian Kingdom, foralism and confederalism became the predominant ideologies of the new confederation. The rise of the Estado Social in the mid-1920s would see the rise of Pascualism as well as the institutionalisation of Delepasian exceptionalism; modern forms of liberalism, conservatism, and socialism would develop in response to Pascualist rule with all three ideological groups committing themselves to promoting a more democratic form of government. The finalisation of the development of the modern political ideologies in Castadilla would end in the late 1990s after the end of the Velvet Revolution, with Velvetine Socialism and national conservatism being some of the most prominent ideological developments.
With the fusion of ideologies being predominant throughout Castadilla's political history and with Christianity being a predominant religious identity across all the political spectrum, the easiest way to determine political leanings is through one's chosen theological movement; those who adhere to a more fundamentalist or even traditionalist form of Christian theology are generally more likely to be national conservative or a Delepasian exceptionalist, those who adhere to a less dogmatically political form of Christian theology tend to be identify with the political centre, and those who subscribe to liberationist forms of theology tend towards the political left.
History
Early Delepasianism
The earliest instances of formal political ideologies in what is now Castadilla first emerged in the late 18th Century after the end of the Carto-Pelaxian Commonwealth in 1792. With the loss of modern-day Cartadania during the partitions and thus the end of the perceived privilege that the Cartadanians had held, the colonists in the Viceroyalty of Los Rumas began to assert themselves politically with the rise of Delepasian nationalism. Early Delepasian nationalists, such as the famed poet and author Juan Guerrero who coined the term "Delepasian" in 1797, were largely influenced by the Kilikas Enlightenment and thus professed early liberal ideas such as constitutionalism and even republicanism; many early nationalists wanted a "crowned republic" where a liberal government is established on the basis of popular sovereignty with a meritocratic political elite who would be in charge of leadership while the monarch served as a purely cultural and symbolic figurehead with no political power. This stood in direct opposition to long-standing notion that the colonists in the Viceroyalty identified as being Pelaxians, a notion that was supported by opponents of Delepasianism who were still loyal to the monarchy and the old aristocracy.
Delepasianism, particularly the radical "pure republican" faction, first entered into mainstream Pelaxian politics during the years of the First Pelaxian Republic. Although a form of nationalism, Delepasianism was closely-aligned to the beliefs of the staunch Pelaxian republican and Enlightenment thinker Luciano Valera who happened to be one of the three leaders of the First Republic; for many early Delepasianists, Valera's views were in support for Delepasian representation in the Pelaxian government, and many prominent officials during the First Republic, such as famed proto-socialist thinker Ernesto Chavez, were Delepasian. Delepasianism was the first major ideology in what is now Castadilla, and it served as the foundation for modern forms of socialism, liberalism, conservatism, and even nationalism in Castadilla.
Late colonial era and Delepasian Kingdom
The end of the First Pelaxian Republic and the restoration of the Girojon monarchy in 1814 saw the rise in counter-Enlightenment thought in opposition to the liberal ideals that were championed for the past decade. This new ideological thought, while it took in certain ideas from early Delepasianism such as nationalism and constitutionalism, was very supportive of the Girojon monarchy, the old aristocracy, and the Catholic Church, seeing all three institutions as being a core aspect of the social hierarchy in Pelaxia. These new conservatives, known as "Modern Royalists" or simply as "Royalists", still saw potential in some of the ideas that have emerged from the Enlightenment, but they still called for these ideas to be tempered and moderated to ensure a stable and orderly society. They did, however, believe that Delepasians were entitled to their own government, a new kingdom that would serve as one half of a real union between them and Pelaxia known as the Pelaxio-Delepasian Union. The Royalists saw this proposal for a "dual monarchy" to be the only way to ensure Delepasian loyalty to the Pelaxian crown while also giving them full authority to handle their own internal affairs without running afoul of future policies made in Albalitor.
Delepasianism itself would be split into two new liberal camps. Moderate liberals, who have emphasised constitutionalism over republicanism, would be known as "National Constitutionalists". National Constitutionalists still advocated for popular sovereignty and meritocracy, but under a "liberal monarchy" wherein the monarch's power shall be limited by a constitution and that power will instead be in the hands of the meritocratic elite, who would handle the day-to-day governance. Unlike the Royalists, who still wished to remain as close to the Pelaxian crown as possible, the National Constitutionalists called for an independent Delepasian state that would either be under a personal union with Pelaxia or under the rule of a cadet branch of the Girojons; the former option would necessitate the retention of the office of the Viceroy as representative of the Pelaxian monarchy while the latter would see the office of the Viceroy be renamed to Prefect to the Crown. The status of aristocracy in the new Delepasian state would be debated upon, but most National Constitutionalist factions were largely hostile to the idea of establishing a new aristocracy.
The more radical camps of Delepasianism, those who have emphasised republicanism over constitutionalism, would be become the "National Republicans". Like the National Constitutionalists, the National Republicans advocated for a liberal, independent Delepasian state governed by the principles of popular sovereignty and meritocracy. Unlike the National Constitutionalists, however, the National Republicans called for a republican form of government modelled after the triumvirate republic that ruled the First Pelaxian Republic; they did, however, made some modifications to their ideal form of government through inserting additional checks and balances which would have ensured orderly governance without the instability that had plagued the First Republic. The National Republicans were themselves split into multiple factions ranging from moderate liberals who were not unlike the National Constitutionalists to more radical liberals and even proto-socialists; most of these proto-socialists, inspired by the philosophy of Ernesto Chavez, were the forefathers of utopian socialism, an umbrella term used to derisively refer to pre-Marxist forms of socialism.
These three ideological currents were predominant throughout the latter years of the colonial era and especially during the brief Delepasian Kingdom which came into existence after the Pelaxian monarchy was abolished permanently in 1852. The intense rivalry between the three groups would prove to be the kingdom's downfall, however, with the kingdom collapsing three months after its formation.
Foralist era
Rise of Delepasian exceptionalism
Estado Social
Velvet Revolution
21st century
Main ideological groups
Socialism
Liberalism
Conservatism
Nationalism
Other ideologies
21st State Movement
Regionalism
Satirical ideologies
Theologies of the main ideological groups
Comparison to global politics
See also
Castadilla articles | |||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| History |
|  | |||||||||||||||||
| Geography |
| ||||||||||||||||||
| Politics |
| ||||||||||||||||||
| Economy |
| ||||||||||||||||||
| Society |
| ||||||||||||||||||
| Imperial Family | |||||||||||||||||||
