Talk:Housing in Urcea

From IxWiki
Revision as of 12:07, 21 February 2024 by Urcea (talk | contribs) (Created page with "Urcea OP — Today at 7:52 AM Unusual centralization began with the end of the Saints war. Lots of different conflicting claims back-and-forth on large feudal Estates often were resolved by the crown, taking the land and just compensating the claimants. This wasn’t used for any revolutionary purpose, but was just new revenue for the crown, and a method to destroy the long-term influence of the nobility. The next big wave of land reform came after the confessional wa...")
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Urcea OP

— Today at 7:52 AM

Unusual centralization began with the end of the Saints war. Lots of different conflicting claims back-and-forth on large feudal Estates often were resolved by the crown, taking the land and just compensating the claimants. This wasn’t used for any revolutionary purpose, but was just new revenue for the crown, and a method to destroy the long-term influence of the nobility. The next big wave of land reform came after the confessional war, where, although some Catholic loyalists were granted largest states, and that were lost during the reign of the protestants or award rival states, for the most part many of the reclaims territories were retained by the crown for “some useful purpose“ this was originally intended as either military or infrastructure But soon become part of the Homestead program. Laws changed during this time would also make it much harder for distant relations to claim large, feudal estates and streamline. The process of them becoming part of the crown. Additionally, cash strapped Catholic ability, both new and old took advantage of the program of Leo and sold excess parts of their estates to the crown. These are your usual unproductive parts specially, down south in the jungles, and in the deserts at the time it was basically perceived as a bail out in exchange for an nominal amount of land with a little value but it contributed overall to the nationalization of land in the country in the 1740s another small wave occurred as or maybe it was the 1720s whenever that major military reform happened as the state required certain strategically necessary parcels of land in order to build supply depose, etc. etc. Another pool of national land now the land did not remain stagnant at this time as much of the new land plus territories taken from the English, and the Persians had to become national land for the homestead program but the point here is that it’s transitioning from large holders to the crown or large holders through the crown to homesteaders Presumably king Nile also inaugurated a period of deliberate landform, and also began legitimizing the Commons with a title program much earlier than the later complicated title program All of this combines to basically mostly nationalized lands by the middle of the 19th century, which allows for more homesteads, but obviously economic dynamism as lots of productive lands or lands that can become productive by means of irrigation are available for sale by the government Most of the government land supply is depleted by 1980 as much of it has been sold off for private housing development and the growth of the suburb At some point, it became the policy of the government to dissolve all large holds it came into possession of Oh yeah probably during the Crown Regency there’s like A mandatory conversion of long-standing 99 year leaseholds into private property ownership building on an Aedanicad incentivized policy to do so Such that by 1900 basically Urcea has a US type land situation

Urcea OP

— Today at 8:00 AM

I figure after the division of the provinces in 1895 that national land was given to the provinces with 40% retained by the feds The latter of which forming some park and agricultural stuff type irrigation