2030 Urcean elections: Difference between revisions

m
Line 96: Line 96:
===Local===
===Local===
==Turnout==
==Turnout==
Turnout in the 2030 Urcean elections sat at around 58.2%, a relatively low turnout year for most Urcean elections. Several possible reasons for this have been posited by analysts and pundits, including the seeming inevitability of a close Solidarity victory, the focus on Livio Iarnán's personality rather than any pertinent issue, and the stability of the economy.
==Aftermath and reactions==
==Aftermath and reactions==
===Working Families emerges===
===Working Families emerges===
The major election night surprise was the 13 seat gain of the [[List_of_Urcean_political_parties#Working_Families_Party|Working Families Party]], a relatively minor political party whose Daoni members split from the [[Social Labor Party (Urcea)|Social Labor Party]] in [[2026]]. The Party's left wing, religious-friendly message resonated with some voters who had traditionally been part of the left wing of the defunct [[Commonwealth Union (Urcea)|Commonwealth Union]]. After the 2030 election, it had 18 seats, making it the third largest in the Daoni. Its 13 pickups came equally from the Social Labor Party and [[Solidarity Party (Urcea)|Solidarity Party]] in heavily urbanized areas.
The major election night surprise was the 13 seat gain of the [[List_of_Urcean_political_parties#Working_Families_Party|Working Families Party]], a relatively minor political party whose Daoni members split from the [[Social Labor Party (Urcea)|Social Labor Party]] in [[2026]]. The Party's left wing, religious-friendly message resonated with some voters who had traditionally been part of the left wing of the defunct [[Commonwealth Union (Urcea)|Commonwealth Union]]. After the 2030 election, it had 18 seats, making it the third largest in the Daoni. Its 13 pickups came equally from the Social Labor Party and [[Solidarity Party (Urcea)|Solidarity Party]] in heavily urbanized areas.
[[Category: IXWB]]
[[Category: IXWB]]