6,563
edits
Antipartisan law in Kiravia: Difference between revisions
m
→Additional Statutes
m (1 revision imported: IXWB Import - Take 1) |
|||
| (One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
A large body of '''antipartisan law in Kiravia''' exists to restrict the formation and activity of {{wp|political parties}}, on the federal level as well as in individual [[Federal subjects of the Kiravian Federacy|federal subjects]] such as states and territories. Federal antipartisan law is a relatively recent development: Mainly embodied in Article R of the Fundamental Statute and subsequent legislation, it was enacted after the fall of the [[Kiravian Union|Kirosocialist régime]] in order to prevent the rise of another {{wp|single-party state|single-}} or {{wp|dominant-party system|dominant-party state}} as had occurred under the [[Kirosocialist | A large body of '''antipartisan law in Kiravia''' exists to restrict the formation and activity of {{wp|political parties}}, on the federal level as well as in individual [[Federal subjects of the Kiravian Federacy|federal subjects]] such as states and territories. Federal antipartisan law is a relatively recent development: Mainly embodied in Article R of the Fundamental Statute and subsequent legislation, it was enacted after the fall of the [[Kiravian Union|Kirosocialist régime]] in order to prevent the rise of another {{wp|single-party state|single-}} or {{wp|dominant-party system|dominant-party state}} as had occurred under the [[Kirosocialist Party]]. Antipartisan law on the state and territorial level has a much longer history, especially in inland, western, and far northern [[Great Kirav]], and has expanded significantly since Kirosocialism. | ||
Antipartisan laws exist as constitutional provisions as well as statutes, and a small but significant body of {{wp|case law}} has developed as a result of litigation under these laws. They can range in severity from outright constitutional prohibitions on certain types of political organisations to [XXXlessseverething] | Antipartisan laws exist as constitutional provisions as well as statutes, and a small but significant body of {{wp|case law}} has developed as a result of litigation under these laws. They can range in severity from outright constitutional prohibitions on certain types of political organisations to [XXXlessseverething] | ||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
Pre-Kirsoc background. Fall of Kirsoc. | Pre-Kirsoc background. Fall of Kirsoc. | ||
The antipartisan provisions of the [[Constitutional History of Kiravia#"Restoration Constitution" of the Kiravian Federacy|Restoration Constitution]] were put in place primarily to prevent a hypothetically resurgent Kirosocialist Party from resuming wholesale control of the country, but also to lay to rest concerns among the minority factions within the National Renewal Movement and the mainland Kiravian public that the Restoration would result in *de facto* single-party rule by the Renaissance Party. | |||
===Article R=== | ===Article R=== | ||
===Additional Statutes=== | ===Additional Statutes=== | ||
A special carveout in the Anti-Party Law allows for deceased persons to named as general secretaries or presidents of provincial party chapters at the time of the law's passage to remain in office. This clause was included to allow provincial chapters of the Renaissance Party to retain [[V.R. Sarosten]] and [[Séan Kæśek]] as their eternal leaders. Members of opposition parties have criticised this clause, but no one cares very much. | |||
===Political Finance Commission=== | ===Political Finance Commission=== | ||