Track gauges around the world and Iseul v. Ministry of State: Difference between pages

From IxWiki
(Difference between pages)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
Tag: 2017 source edit
 
mNo edit summary
 
Line 1: Line 1:
Different {{wp|rail gauges}} are in use around the world. The rail systems of most countries predominantly use one gauge or another as a national standard, in some cases due to a legal mandate.
{{Italic title}}
{{Stub}}


{|class="wikitable sortable"
'''Iseul v. Ministry of State''' (1980) was a landmark case before the [[Criminal_justice_system_of_Urcea#Hierarchy_of_courts|Archducal Court]] of [[Urcea]] in which it was ruled that Urcea's traditional, uncodified rule of citizenship-upon-conception applied to foreign nationals. The case had the practical effect of codifying the premise of citizenship-upon-conception and struck down previous prohibitions on accepting citizenship petitions from individually allegedly conceived in [[Urcea]]. The decision involved [[Iseul Oh]], a national of [[Metzetta]], who conclusively proved he was conceived in Urcea while his parents were on honeymoon in 1946. The [[Ministry of State (Urcea)|Ministry of State]] nonetheless denied his request for citizenship, claiming that the conception rule only related to the civil rights of unborn persons in Urcea and did not, on its own, confer Urcean citizenship and nationality. Following lower court decisions which ruled in favor of the Ministry, the Archducal Court ruled unanimously in favor of Iseul Oh, granting him citizenship and establishing a precedent which enhanced the traditional understanding of citizenship-upon-conception.
! Gauge
! Name
! Installation (km)
! Installation (miles)
! Usage
|-
|style="background:#c55e8d; color:white;"| {{Track gauge|1000mm}}
| [[Metre gauge]]
|{{convert|95000|km|mi|disp=table}}
|
|-
|style="background:#6a51b7; color:white;"| {{Track gauge|1067mm}}
| [[Three foot six inch gauge railways|Three foot six inch gauge]]
|{{convert|112000|km|mi|disp=table}}
|
|-
|style="background:#568dd0;"| {{Track gauge|1435mm}}
| {{nowrap|[[Standard gauge]]}}
|{{convert|720000+|km|mi|disp=table}}
| [[Alstin]], [[Caphiria]], [[Cartadania]], [[Diamavya]], [[Nolis]], [[Orenstia]], [[Urcea]], [[Yonderre]], [[Pelaxia]]
|-
|style="background:#305c31;"| {{Track gauge|1520mm}}
| [[5 ft and 1520 mm gauge railways|Five foot and 1520 mm gauge]]
|{{convert|220000|km|mi|disp=table}}
|
|-
|style="background:#148a37;"| {{Track gauge|1524mm}}
| Meridian Gauge/Northern Standard
|{{convert|102023|km|mi|disp=table}}
| [[Meridia]] ([[Kirav|KR]]), [[Fhainnaeran]]
|-
|style="background:#5abf56;"| {{Track gauge|1600mm}}
| [[Five foot three inch gauge railways|Five foot three inch gauge]]
|{{convert|9800|km|mi|disp=table}}
| [[Kiravian Federacy]] (except [[Meridia]])
|-
|style="background:#83dc76;"| {{Track gauge|1668mm}}
| Pelaxian gauge
|{{convert|15394|km|mi|disp=table}}
| [[Pelaxia]]
|-
| style="background:#bbdf94;" | {{Track gauge|1676mm}}
| [[Five foot six inch gauge railways|Five foot six inch gauge]]
|{{convert|134008|km|mi|disp=table}}
|
|-
|}


{{Template:B.I.S NavBox}}
[[Category: Laws of Urcea]]
[[Category:IXWB]]
[[category:Bureau of International Statistics]]
[[Category:World Factbook]]

Revision as of 19:57, 12 April 2022

Iseul v. Ministry of State (1980) was a landmark case before the Archducal Court of Urcea in which it was ruled that Urcea's traditional, uncodified rule of citizenship-upon-conception applied to foreign nationals. The case had the practical effect of codifying the premise of citizenship-upon-conception and struck down previous prohibitions on accepting citizenship petitions from individually allegedly conceived in Urcea. The decision involved Iseul Oh, a national of Metzetta, who conclusively proved he was conceived in Urcea while his parents were on honeymoon in 1946. The Ministry of State nonetheless denied his request for citizenship, claiming that the conception rule only related to the civil rights of unborn persons in Urcea and did not, on its own, confer Urcean citizenship and nationality. Following lower court decisions which ruled in favor of the Ministry, the Archducal Court ruled unanimously in favor of Iseul Oh, granting him citizenship and establishing a precedent which enhanced the traditional understanding of citizenship-upon-conception.