IxWiki

Kiravian Development Executive: Difference between revisions

Page Discussion

Kiravian Development Executive (view source)

Revision as of 00:38, 22 January 2024

329 bytes added ,  22 January
m
Text replacement - "Shaftonist-Republican Alliance" to "Federalist Republican Alliance"
VisualWikitext
m (Text replacement - "Shaftonist-Republican Alliance" to "Federalist Republican Alliance")
 
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown)
Line 102: Line 102:
Beyond its CDRI reports, the IDO also administers a small (relative to the SAF) amount of grant money to benefit marginalised communities.
Beyond its CDRI reports, the IDO also administers a small (relative to the SAF) amount of grant money to benefit marginalised communities.


Inherited from the Kiravian Union as the Interior Development Office, the IDO has been a political (if mostly rhetorical) lightning rod in the larger public debate about the policy significance of ethnic/caste/communal groups under liberalism. The [[Shaftonist-Republican Alliance]], grounded in the ''[[Glossary_of_Coscivian_Terms#Dh|dhianbrikorisēn]]'' of the [[Renaissance Party]] and increasingly perceived in recent decades as representing higher caste interests, has often railed against the agency but has not moved to abolish the IDO despite its long-term political dominance. The [[Coscivian National Congress]], which has a strong voter base among the lower castes, has defended the IDO and its budget from SRA cuts even as a coalition partner. Customary leaders, Urom activists, traditionalist commentators, and some socialists have criticised the IDO's development philosophy and rating criteria as reflective of urban, bourgeois, and upper-caste biases and denigrating towards manual labour and traditional economies.
Inherited from the Kiravian Union as the Interior Development Office, the IDO has been a political (if mostly rhetorical) lightning rod in the larger public debate about the policy significance of ethnic/caste/communal groups under liberalism. The [[Federalist Republican Alliance]], grounded in the ''[[Glossary_of_Coscivian_Terms#Dh|dhianbrikorisēn]]'' of the [[Renaissance Party]] and increasingly perceived in recent decades as representing higher caste interests, has often railed against the agency but has not moved to abolish the IDO despite its long-term political dominance. The [[Coscivian National Congress]], which has a strong voter base among the lower castes, has defended the IDO and its budget from SRA cuts even as a coalition partner. Customary leaders, Urom activists, traditionalist commentators, and some socialists have criticised the IDO's development philosophy and rating criteria as reflective of urban, bourgeois, and upper-caste biases and denigrating towards manual labour and traditional economies.


====CDRI====
====CDRI====
Line 113: Line 113:
|-
|-
| style="background-color:#34cdf9;" | '''Elite''' or '''Market-Dominant'''<br>Populations with dominant positions in either traditional hierarchies ('élite') or concentrated in the upper echelon of modern economic classes ('{{wp|Market dominant minorities|market-dominant}}') <br />Oppress everyone
| style="background-color:#34cdf9;" | '''Elite''' or '''Market-Dominant'''<br>Populations with dominant positions in either traditional hierarchies ('élite') or concentrated in the upper echelon of modern economic classes ('{{wp|Market dominant minorities|market-dominant}}') <br />Oppress everyone
| style="text-align:left;" | Eight High Lineages, Eshavians (in Kirish states), Ligerans,
| style="text-align:left;" | Eight High Lineages, [[Eshavian Coscivians|Eshavians]] (in Kirish states), Ligerans
|-
|-
| style="background-color:#afc8da;" | '''Advanced'''<br />Populations that satisfy the socioëconomic criteria to qualify for 'attainment' status. Overrepresented in the middle class, higher education, managerial occupations, and government bureaucracy.<br />Oppress the Backward castes and below.
| style="background-color:#afc8da;" | '''Advanced'''<br />Populations that satisfy the socioëconomic criteria to qualify for 'attainment' status. Overrepresented in the middle class, higher education, managerial occupations, and government bureaucracy.<br />Rarely implicated in bias incidents but contribute to social exclusion and retard the advancement of inferior castes.
| style="text-align:left;" | Taństans, Kaltans, Santhans, Ardónians, Purgónians, Kerēgulans, Insdans, Kuatans, Hisrovans, Líkutrans, Kirkayasthans,  <br />Demarești
| style="text-align:left;" | Taństans, Kaltans, Santhans, Ardónians, Purgónians, Kerēgulans, Insdans, Kuatans, Hisrovans, Líkutrans, Kirkayasthans <br />[[Ethnic groups in Kiravia#Demarești|Demarești]]
|-
|-
| style="background-color:#dae8fc;" | '''Midstream'''<br />Sub-attainment populations which have satisfied the IDO's criteria for development 'breakout' and are thus regarded as not in need of special government attention or assistance. Formerly designated as the 'Stable' castes.<br>An emerging demographic among the middle classes<br />Involved (usually indirectly) in the oppression of lower castes through discrimination and the cultural reproduction of caste-based prejudices.
| style="background-color:#dae8fc;" | '''Midstream'''<br />Sub-attainment populations which have satisfied the IDO's criteria for development 'breakout' and are thus regarded as not in need of special government attention or assistance. Formerly designated as the 'Stable' castes.<br>An emerging demographic among the middle classes<br />Involved (usually indirectly) in the oppression of lower castes through discrimination and the cultural reproduction of caste-based prejudices.
Line 122: Line 122:
|-
|-
| style="background-color:#ecf4ff;" | '''Laggard'''<br />Developmentally sub-attainment (formerly 'Backward') communities without overwhelming impediments to development, such as invidious discrimination or unreachability factors (e.g. geographic remoteness, itinerance)<br>Underrepresented in the middle classes<br />Often directly implicted in the  oppression of lower castes.
| style="background-color:#ecf4ff;" | '''Laggard'''<br />Developmentally sub-attainment (formerly 'Backward') communities without overwhelming impediments to development, such as invidious discrimination or unreachability factors (e.g. geographic remoteness, itinerance)<br>Underrepresented in the middle classes<br />Often directly implicted in the  oppression of lower castes.
| style="text-align:left;" | Iforians, Yarans, Kirkir, Kelkar, Kaskans, Saskans, Skōrdans, Tharysans, Xorsyakavs, Qihuxians, Okutrans, <br />Azikorians, Rhūniks
| style="text-align:left;" | Iforians, Yarans, Kirkir, Kelkar, Kaskans, Saskans, Skōrdans, Tharysans, Xorsyakavs, Qihuxians, Okutrans, <br />Azikorians, [[Ethnic groups in Kiravia#Rhūniks|Rhūniks]]
|- style="font-weight:bold;"
|- style="font-weight:bold;"
| colspan="2" | ⇧ Not Actively Monitored ⇧<br />  ⇩    Actively Monitored    ⇩
| colspan="2" | ⇧ Not Actively Monitored ⇧<br />  ⇩    Actively Monitored    ⇩
|-
|-
| style="background-color:#ffce93;" | '''Marginal''' or '''Threatened'''<br />Backward castes at risk of becoming more backward; or otherwise in need of the IDO’s closer attention than other Backward classes. Generally they are the smaller and more insular of the castes formerly designated as 'Backward'.<br>Rare among the middle classes<br />Subproblematically to mildly oppressed.
| style="background-color:#ffce93;" | '''Marginal''' or '''Threatened'''<br />Backward castes at risk of becoming more backward; or otherwise in need of the IDO’s closer attention than other Backward classes. Generally they are the smaller and more insular of the castes formerly designated as 'Backward'.<br>Rare among the middle classes<br />Subproblematically to mildly oppressed.
| style="text-align:left;" | Pine Swamp Coscivians, Ossiryans, Fulmarines, Kayaki, <br />Salyar, Wastani, <br />Five Civilised Tribes<br />Enochites, Abrigalast sets,
| style="text-align:left;" | Pine Swamp Coscivians, Ossiryans, Fulmarines, Kayaki, <br />Salyar, Wastani, <br />Five Civilised Tribes<br />Enochites, [[Abrigalasts|Abrigalast]] sets,
|-
|-
| style="background-color:#ffc702;" | '''Vulnerable'''<br />Communities not necessarily at the bottom of the social hierarchy, but nonetheless subject to significant social exclusion and economic deprivation, with low access to opportunity by local/regional standards.<br>Generally absent from the middle class<br />Moderately oppressed
| style="background-color:#ffc702;" | '''Vulnerable'''<br />Communities not necessarily at the bottom of the social hierarchy, but nonetheless subject to significant social exclusion and economic deprivation, with low access to opportunity by local/regional standards.<br>Generally absent from the middle class<br />Moderately oppressed
| style="text-align:left;" | Sea Coscivians, Hoppers, Fever Swamp Coscivians, Eulugians, Meadowland Tribes<br />
| style="text-align:left;" | [[Ethnic groups in Kiravia#Sea Coscivians|Sea Coscivians]], [[Hoppers]], [[Knassania#Society and Culture|Fever Swamp Coscivians]], [[Ethnic groups in Kiravia#Euluśians|Euluśians]], Meadowland Tribes<br />
|-
|-
| style="background-color:#f8a102; color:#000000;" | '''Depressed'''<br />Communities perpetually trapped at the bottom of their local social hierarchies.<br>Virtually or literally absent from the middle class<br />Heavily oppressed
| style="background-color:#f8a102; color:#000000;" | '''Depressed'''<br />Communities perpetually trapped at the bottom of their local social hierarchies.<br>Virtually or literally absent from the middle class<br />Heavily oppressed
| style="text-align:left;" | Harsitem, Yakavem, Ginger Dalits, Salters and Colliers<br />Caoi (Caoi may not actually be ranked because they can’t be studied)<br />Defeated Tribes, Urbanised Urom, Landless Urom<br />Midget colonies
| style="text-align:left;" | [[Harsitem]], [[Yakavem]], Ginger Dalits, Salters and Colliers<br />Caoi (Caoi may not actually be ranked because they can’t be studied)<br />Defeated Tribes, Urbanised [[Urom]], Landless Urom<br />Midget colonies
|}
|}


Retrieved from "https://ixwiki.com/wiki/Special:MobileDiff/65054...68917"