6,472
edits
Kiravian Security Executive: Difference between revisions
Kiravian Security Executive (view source)
Revision as of 14:50, 19 September 2023
, 19 September 2023no edit summary
m (Text replacement - "Aboriginal" to "Urom") |
mNo edit summary |
||
| Line 60: | Line 60: | ||
}} | }} | ||
The '''Kiravian Security Executive''' is the [[ | The '''Kiravian Security Executive''' is the [[Executive College|Collegiate executive]] under which agencies and activities relevant to the security of the Kiravian Federacy but outside the purview of the [[Kiravian Defence Executive|Defence Executive]] are organised. The Security Executive's areas of responsibility include {{wp|internal security}} and {{wp|state security}}, {{wp|cybersecurity}}, {{wp|biosecurity}}, {{wp|counterterrorism}}, border protection, and some aspects of {{wp|emergency management}} and {{wp|counterintelligence}}. It is a core component of the Federacy's security apparatus. | ||
==Profile== | ==Profile== | ||
The Security Executive has competency in a wide range of areas that are more domestic and non-military in nature, or have been otherwise assessed to be better-handled outside the Kiravian Armed Forces and the Defence Executive. These include matters that primarily involve Kiravian civilians (where the use of military assets is generally considered illegitimate), security tasks that are simply non-military in nature, and those that involve monitoring of the Kiravian government itself (where use of military assets would violate Article X of the Fundamental Statute). | The Security Executive has competency in a wide range of areas that are more domestic and non-military in nature, or have been otherwise assessed to be better-handled outside the Kiravian Armed Forces and the Defence Executive. These include matters that primarily involve Kiravian civilians (where the use of military assets is generally considered illegitimate), security tasks that are simply non-military in nature, and those that involve monitoring of the Kiravian government itself (where use of military assets would violate Article X of the Fundamental Statute). | ||