Legality of euthanasia around the world: Difference between revisions

m
mNo edit summary
Tag: 2017 source edit
 
(6 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown)
Line 11: Line 11:
(passive)
(passive)
!Notes
!Notes
|-
|{{Flag|Austro-Caldera}}
|{{no|Illegal}}
|{{yes|Legal}}
|While patients may not request euthanasia, they may request physicians not to treat a condition that may lead to death.
|-
|-
|{{flag|Caphiria}}
|{{flag|Caphiria}}
Line 25: Line 30:
| {{no|Illegal}}
| {{no|Illegal}}
| {{yes|Legal}}
| {{yes|Legal}}
|
|-
|-
| {{flag|Faneria}}
| {{flag|Faneria}}
Line 30: Line 36:
| {{no|Illegal}}
| {{no|Illegal}}
|Euthanasia is only allowed in specific situations, generally lethal prenatal defects or when an adult requests it for some terminal illnesses. Doctors offering euthanasia is strictly prohibited, however, and euthanasia applications are required to be vetted to prevent coerced or opportunistic instances.
|Euthanasia is only allowed in specific situations, generally lethal prenatal defects or when an adult requests it for some terminal illnesses. Doctors offering euthanasia is strictly prohibited, however, and euthanasia applications are required to be vetted to prevent coerced or opportunistic instances.
|-
|{{flag|Hendalarsk}}
| {{no|Illegal}}
| {{yes|Legal}}
| The government of [[Max Frisch]] considered a proposal to permit active euthanasia in 1992, but it was shelved after a significant outcry from disability rights campaigners, the Church and various factions within the [[Hendalarskara Social Front|HSF]] itself. Passive euthanasia, if an individual has a DNR in place or with the consent of their family if they are in a permanent vegetative state, was formally legalised by the Great Chamber in 1951. Active euthanasia via overdose of painkillers is formally illegal, so as to allow effective prosecution of doctors who deliberately kill patients without their consent, but for terminally ill patients in the latter stages of illness is effectively decriminalised at the doctor's discretion.
|-
|-
| {{flag|Kiravia}}
| {{flag|Kiravia}}
Line 40: Line 51:
| {{yes|Legal}}
| {{yes|Legal}}
|Physicians are not permitted to intentionally end the life of a patient, however patients are well within their rights to refuse treatment even if it leads to shortening of life expectancy.
|Physicians are not permitted to intentionally end the life of a patient, however patients are well within their rights to refuse treatment even if it leads to shortening of life expectancy.
|-
|{{flag|Tierrador}}
| {{yes|Legal}}
| {{yes|Legal}}
|Legal for any patient over the age of 18 who is suffering "unbearably without hope." Two actively-licensed physicians must be present at the time of the request and at the time of death.
|-
|-
|{{flag|Urcea}}
|{{flag|Urcea}}
Line 50: Line 66:
| {{yes|Encouraged}}
| {{yes|Encouraged}}
|Vithinjan culture does not believe that holding onto life once the time has come is ever desirable. Because of this the practice of euthanasia is encouraged  
|Vithinjan culture does not believe that holding onto life once the time has come is ever desirable. Because of this the practice of euthanasia is encouraged  
|
|-
|-
|{{flag|Puertego}}
|{{flag|Puertego}}
| {{no|Illegal}}
| {{no|Illegal}}
| {{no|Illegal}}
| {{no|Illegal}}
|euthanasia in Puertego is illegal even in circumstances of the terminally ill, however if someone has a terminal illness they are allowed to refuse further treatment and simply be given drugs to deal with the pain they are experiencing.
|Euthanasia in Puertego is illegal even in circumstances of the terminally ill, however if someone has a terminal illness they are allowed to refuse further treatment and simply be given drugs to deal with the pain they are experiencing.
|}
|}


Line 61: Line 76:
{{B.I.S NavBox}}
{{B.I.S NavBox}}
[[Category:Bureau of International Statistics]]
[[Category:Bureau of International Statistics]]
[[Category:IXWB]]
[[Category:Law]]
[[Category:Law]]