Protocols Act of 2023: Difference between revisions

m
no edit summary
mNo edit summary
mNo edit summary
Line 5: Line 5:
==Criticism==
==Criticism==


The Act was subject of significant criticism from the [[Social Labor Party (Urcea)|Social Labor Party]], which characterized the Act as a "clear signal of Urcean imperialism, presuming that our Ministries may directly govern other nominally sovereign states". All members of the Social Labor Party voted against the measure.
The Act was subject of significant criticism from the [[Social Labor Party (Urcea)|Social Labor Party]] and, which characterized the Act as a "clear signal of Urcean imperialism, presuming that our Ministries may directly govern other nominally sovereign states". All members of the Social Labor Party voted against the measure. The [[Bedrock Movement]] was strongly in opposition, rallying a 65,000-person protest in [[Urceopolis (City)|Urceopolis]] on March 6th, [[2023]].


==Repeal==
==Repeal==