13,421
edits
Protocols Act of 2023: Difference between revisions
m
no edit summary
mNo edit summary |
mNo edit summary |
||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
==Criticism== | ==Criticism== | ||
The Act was subject of significant criticism from the [[Social Labor Party (Urcea)|Social Labor Party]] and, which characterized the Act as a "clear signal of Urcean imperialism, presuming that our Ministries may directly govern other nominally sovereign states". All members of the Social Labor Party voted against the measure. The [[Bedrock Movement]] was strongly in opposition, rallying a 65,000-person protest in [[Urceopolis (City)|Urceopolis]] on March 6th, [[2023]]. | The Act was subject of significant criticism from the [[Social Labor Party (Urcea)|Social Labor Party]] and, which characterized the Act as a "clear signal of Urcean imperialism, presuming that our Ministries may directly govern other nominally sovereign states". All members of the Social Labor Party voted against the measure. The [[Bedrock Movement]] was strongly in opposition, rallying a 65,000-person protest in [[Urceopolis (City)|Urceopolis]] on March 6th, [[2023]]. After the [[Pachoy Rebellion]], the Act was seen by Urceans as among the most egregious examples of Urcean behavior in the Nysdra region, and in early fall [[2032]] there were widespread calls for its repeal. | ||
==Repeal== | ==Repeal== | ||
The Protocols Act was repealed by the Protocols Act of | The Protocols Act was repealed by the Protocols Act of 2032 in the aftermath of the Pachoy Rebellion. The 2032 Act restored the central role of the Ministry of State in interacting with the members of NSTA with the exception of the [[Ministry_of_State_(Urcea)#Department_of_National_and_Institutional_Development|Department of National and Institutional Development]] and [[Ministry_of_Commerce_(Urcea)#Agency_for_Cronan_Economic_Development|Agency for Cronan Economic Development]]. | ||
[[Category: Urcea]] | [[Category: Urcea]] | ||