13,595
edits
Urcean socialist philosophy: Difference between revisions
m
Text replacement - "lead to" to "led to"
m (Text replacement - "National Democratic Party" to "Commonwealth Union") |
m (Text replacement - "lead to" to "led to") |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
'''Urcean socialist philosophy''' is the study of the different strains of {{wp|socialist}} thought in [[Urcea]]. | '''Urcean socialist philosophy''' is the study of the different strains of {{wp|socialist}} thought in [[Urcea]]. | ||
==Marxism== | ==Marxism== | ||
Traditional readings of {{wp|Karl Marx|Carlos Marx}} have been popular in small circles in [[Urcea]] since the establishment of his works in the mid 19th century. Marx's discussion of the {{wp|Historical materialism|materialist reading of history}} described a system in which the feudal mode of production would give way to a capitalist mode followed by the creation of the socialist mode of production. Marx's view of the materialist progression, however, has caused divisions among Urcean Marxists since its inception; writing as a continental [[Sarpedon|Sarpedonian]], it was not clear to Marxists of the 19th century through today if this straight-forward model is applicable to Urcea. This fundamental disagreement | Traditional readings of {{wp|Karl Marx|Carlos Marx}} have been popular in small circles in [[Urcea]] since the establishment of his works in the mid 19th century. Marx's discussion of the {{wp|Historical materialism|materialist reading of history}} described a system in which the feudal mode of production would give way to a capitalist mode followed by the creation of the socialist mode of production. Marx's view of the materialist progression, however, has caused divisions among Urcean Marxists since its inception; writing as a continental [[Sarpedon|Sarpedonian]], it was not clear to Marxists of the 19th century through today if this straight-forward model is applicable to Urcea. This fundamental disagreement led to the division of Marxists within Urcea between the "Traditionalist Marxists" and the "Particular Marxists". | ||
===Traditionalist Marxists=== | ===Traditionalist Marxists=== | ||
Traditionalist Marxists in [[Urcea]] argue that Urcean society is merely in the capitalist mode of production with a mix of particular institutions that provide a public benefit but do not otherwise change its historical state. The traditionalists point out that a {{wp|distributist}} economy is still, largely, a {{wp|market economy}} and that the means of production are still owned by private hands and serve the interests of private individuals. Mid-20th century [[Republican Party (Urcea)|Republican Party]] leader James Heoghair summarized this position with his well-repeated quote that "a large {{wp|bourgeoisie}} is still a bourgeoisie." | Traditionalist Marxists in [[Urcea]] argue that Urcean society is merely in the capitalist mode of production with a mix of particular institutions that provide a public benefit but do not otherwise change its historical state. The traditionalists point out that a {{wp|distributist}} economy is still, largely, a {{wp|market economy}} and that the means of production are still owned by private hands and serve the interests of private individuals. Mid-20th century [[Republican Party (Urcea)|Republican Party]] leader James Heoghair summarized this position with his well-repeated quote that "a large {{wp|bourgeoisie}} is still a bourgeoisie." | ||