Animal rights by country: Difference between revisions

m
Text replacement - "Takatta Loa" to "Loa Republic"
mNo edit summary
m (Text replacement - "Takatta Loa" to "Loa Republic")
Line 65: Line 65:
| {{yes}}
| {{yes}}
|-
|-
|{{flag|Takatta Loa}}
|{{flag|Loa Republic}}
| {{varies}}
| {{varies}}
|{{varies}}
|{{varies}}
Line 258: Line 258:
|
|
|-
|-
|{{flag|Takatta Loa}}
|{{flag|Loa Republic}}
|{{yes C|}}
|{{yes C|}}
|{{yes C|}}
|{{yes C|}}
Line 272: Line 272:
|{{yes C|}}
|{{yes C|}}
|{{yes C|}}
|{{yes C|}}
|Although Takatta Loa's lack of animal welfare laws is considered among the worst in the world, special care is afforded to insects and other arthropods due to religious beliefs. As a result, there is a great deal of legislation enshrining the rights of arthropods, which in some cases are more advanced than the rights afforded to Loa citizens.
|Although Loa Republic's lack of animal welfare laws is considered among the worst in the world, special care is afforded to insects and other arthropods due to religious beliefs. As a result, there is a great deal of legislation enshrining the rights of arthropods, which in some cases are more advanced than the rights afforded to Loa citizens.
|-
|-
|{{flag|Urcea}}
|{{flag|Urcea}}