Government of Urcea: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m (this is done although I should likely add photos) |
mNo edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
[[File:13-05-24-wien-RalfR-107.jpg|thumb|right|250px|The [[Julian Palace]] serves as the home of the national government and the focal point and symbol for the nation.]] | |||
The '''Government of the Apostolic Kingdom of [[Urcea]]''' is a type of dual federalist hierarchy and dual-sovereignty system. The Urcean Government is organized through a system of documents, edicts, and precedents called the [[Constitution of Urcea]], which was largely formed through the twin ideological impulses of Catholic social teaching and [[Crown Liberalism]]. | The '''Government of the Apostolic Kingdom of [[Urcea]]''' is a type of dual federalist hierarchy and dual-sovereignty system. The Urcean Government is organized through a system of documents, edicts, and precedents called the [[Constitution of Urcea]], which was largely formed through the twin ideological impulses of Catholic social teaching and [[Crown Liberalism]]. | ||
At all levels of state, the [[Apostolic King of Urcea|Apostolic King-Elector]] is the central organizing Constitutional basis for authority, and all who live in the Kingdom are legally understood to be “subjects”, rather than “citizens”, though the concept applies equally and the terminology is used interchangeably. The King is constrained by a series of written and unwritten constitutional precedents. The system can best be described as something of a constitutional monarchy with a semi-presidential system below the Crown. | At all levels of state, the [[Apostolic King of Urcea|Apostolic King-Elector]] is the central organizing Constitutional basis for authority, and all who live in the Kingdom are legally understood to be “subjects”, rather than “citizens”, though the concept applies equally and the terminology is used interchangeably. The King is constrained by a series of written and unwritten constitutional precedents. The system can best be described as something of a constitutional monarchy with a semi-presidential system below the Crown. | ||