6,521
edits
User:Kir/Draftspace11: Difference between revisions
m
→Exit Strategy
m (→GKIP) |
m (→Exit Strategy) |
||
| Line 457: | Line 457: | ||
===Exit Strategy=== | ===Exit Strategy=== | ||
As of its 2007 manifesto, GKIP's vision for Great Kirav's separation from the Kiravian Federacy follows a model dubbed "Paulastrafication" (''Pávlastrasoiktor''), referencing the peaceful and amicable manner in which [[Paulastra]] became independent from Kiravian colonial rule. Whereas Paulastra erected its own monarchy while recognising the symbolic authority of the [[Marble Emperor]], the GKIP envisions a Republic of Kirav as a federative {{wp|crowned republic}} with the Emperor as its direct head-of-state. | As of its 2007 manifesto, GKIP's vision for Great Kirav's separation from the Kiravian Federacy follows a model dubbed "Paulastrafication" (''Pávlastrasoiktor''), referencing the peaceful and amicable manner in which [[Paulastra]] became independent from Kiravian colonial rule. Whereas Paulastra erected its own monarchy while recognising the symbolic authority of the [[Marble Emperor]], the GKIP envisions a Republic of Kirav as a federative {{wp|crowned republic}} with the Emperor as its direct head-of-state. | ||
GKIP says it would "come to a transitional arrangement" with a rump Federacy allowing it to retain the [[District of Coīnvra]] for up to five years while it finds a new seat of government, provided that the Federacy cover the District's utility bills. It would expect that the Interlake Canal District be gifted to the Republic of Kirav upon independence, however. | |||
== Activities == | == Activities == | ||