14,550
edits
Urcean socialist philosophy: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m
no edit summary
mNo edit summary |
|||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
====Urcean Mode Electoralists==== | ====Urcean Mode Electoralists==== | ||
====Capitalist Mode Accelerationists==== | ====Capitalist Mode Accelerationists==== | ||
=====Constitutional socialism== | |||
{{Main|Constitutional socialism}} | |||
Beginning in the [[Red Interregnum]], the growing trends of "institutional socialism" or "Constitutional socialism" as created in [[Veltorina]] became a popular alternative to traditionalist Marxist readings. The Veltorine model emphasized the need for an "institutional revolution" - a central State-Party organizing body responsible for the regular governance of the State and additionally responsible for bringing about revolutionary conditions which would establish the socialist mode of production in the future. Unlike {{wp|Vanguard}}-style revolutionaries, however, the institutional revolution is viewed as a "top-down" rather than "bottom-up" model, using the authority of the State to conform society to the conditions necessary to create the socialist mode of production while "safely shepherding" the people through the transition of capitalism by means of safe and strong social institutions similar to {{wp|social democracy}}. Unlike both vanguardism and social democracy, this model permits only one legal party but a variety of civic-minded factions within the party. | |||
Institutional socialism became popular both as an alternative to the FitzRexist "centralist liberal" model of social reform popular during the [[Red Interregnum]] but also as an intended answer to the question of the "Urcean mode of production", as the institutional revolution would be able to maintain helpful institutions and otherwise reform society with the authority of the State; the distinction of the Urcean mode would become meaningless as State authority could transition it into socialism without need for a sudden and violent revolution. Institutional socialism enjoyed short lived popularity within the [[Republican Party (Urcea)|Republican Party]] of [[Urcea]] following the failures of the [[Urcean Republic]], but had fallen out of popularity by the 1910s as the institutional revolution in [[Veltorina]] transformed the nation from a socialist one to a semi-{{wp|liberal}} parliamentary democracy. | |||
==Organic and Wittonian socialism== | ==Organic and Wittonian socialism== | ||