6,997
edits
Caritist Social Union: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m
Text replacement - "Aboriginal" to "Urom"
mNo edit summary |
m (Text replacement - "Aboriginal" to "Urom") |
||
| Line 154: | Line 154: | ||
Ethno-social groups with particularly strong CSU voting patterns include Serradans; Peninsular Coscivians and other R-Coscivians such as Kastrovans, Lusans, Síkutrans; Levantine-Kiravians, and H. | Ethno-social groups with particularly strong CSU voting patterns include Serradans; Peninsular Coscivians and other R-Coscivians such as Kastrovans, Lusans, Síkutrans; Levantine-Kiravians, and H. | ||
OLD: Ethno-social groups with particularly strong CSU voting patterns include the urban working class, [[Peninsular Coscivians]], [[Deep South Coscivians]], Ardóniem and Buryóniem Coscivians, Kastrovan Coscivians, Lusem Coscivians, Roman Catholics (excepting Traditionalists, who lean more towards the [[Caucus of Justice|CoR]]), Síkutem and Southern Peninsular Coscivians, Woolzi-Kiravians, Serradem and | OLD: Ethno-social groups with particularly strong CSU voting patterns include the urban working class, [[Peninsular Coscivians]], [[Deep South Coscivians]], Ardóniem and Buryóniem Coscivians, Kastrovan Coscivians, Lusem Coscivians, Roman Catholics (excepting Traditionalists, who lean more towards the [[Caucus of Justice|CoR]]), Síkutem and Southern Peninsular Coscivians, Woolzi-Kiravians, Serradem and Urom tribes practising Catholicism, enfranchised colonial natives, Éilpanem of the St. Margaret Islands, monoreligious Ruricans, middle-class families in micropolitan and semi-rural areas, Methodists, high-church Lutherans, and members of small non-Coscivian religious minorities. | ||
The CSU performs well among farmers with small to medium landholdings, especially the ''sirētur'' class of investor-farmers in the Mid-Oceanic states. Larger landowners are more likely to favour Caucus of Justice affiliated parties. In some CSU parties are competitive among tenant farmers, landless agricultural labourers, and poorer landowning farmers in the inland states, but these tend to vote for a wider range of parties, including the Social Credit Party, smaller agrarian parties affiliated with the KFA, and Kisosocialist parties. | The CSU performs well among farmers with small to medium landholdings, especially the ''sirētur'' class of investor-farmers in the Mid-Oceanic states. Larger landowners are more likely to favour Caucus of Justice affiliated parties. In some CSU parties are competitive among tenant farmers, landless agricultural labourers, and poorer landowning farmers in the inland states, but these tend to vote for a wider range of parties, including the Social Credit Party, smaller agrarian parties affiliated with the KFA, and Kisosocialist parties. | ||