6,557
edits
Federalist Republican Alliance: Difference between revisions
Federalist Republican Alliance (view source)
Revision as of 14:16, 1 February 2023
, 1 February 2023→Platform
m (→Platform) |
|||
| Line 104: | Line 104: | ||
==Platform== | ==Platform== | ||
The SRA is a {{wp| | The SRA is a {{wp|Broad church|broad church}} caucus. Many Shaftonist-Republican politicians, activists, and journalists have advanced the idea that the caucus represents an authentic ideology that draws on a variety of traditions, including [[Shaftonism|Shaftonist]] political thought, the [[Fiannria|Fiannrian liberal tradition]] of the [[Kilikas Enlightenment]], [[New Urcean Democracy|Neo-Urcean democracy]], {{wp|neoclassical economics}}, and (in foreign policy) the {{wp|political realism|political realist}} school of thought dominant among international relations scholars in Kiravia and [[Burgundie]]. In practice, however, and especially since 21200, the SRA has positioned itself as a non-ideological force of the political mainstream, and is generally perceived as such by the public. This broad-church approach has allowed the caucus to incorporate a wide range of different state parties, such as small-government pro-business parties, parties representing various ethnosocial group interests, and conservative and centrist "parties of power" holding long-term electoral dominance in their states. | ||
===Economic Policy=== | ===Economic Policy=== | ||
| Line 117: | Line 117: | ||
*'''Reform SRs''' or '''Public Interest SRs''' join the Liberals in their opposition to direct coördination between government technocrats and market actors, but seek to balance and synthesise economic liberalisation with other priorities such as {{wp|social policy}}, {{wp|environmental policy}}, {{wp|regional policy|regional balance}}, and cultural integrity. Reformists champion {{wp|subsidiarity}} and devolution of domestic economic policy to lower levels of government, policies favourable to small and medium enterprises, public-private partnerships, and {{wp|social enterprise}}. Primarily mainstream [[Shaftonist democracy|Shaftonist democrats]], Reform SRs may also be identified with {{wp|conservative liberalism}}, {{wp|Christian democracy}}, {{wp|neoconservatism}}, and {{wp|radical centrism}}. | *'''Reform SRs''' or '''Public Interest SRs''' join the Liberals in their opposition to direct coördination between government technocrats and market actors, but seek to balance and synthesise economic liberalisation with other priorities such as {{wp|social policy}}, {{wp|environmental policy}}, {{wp|regional policy|regional balance}}, and cultural integrity. Reformists champion {{wp|subsidiarity}} and devolution of domestic economic policy to lower levels of government, policies favourable to small and medium enterprises, public-private partnerships, and {{wp|social enterprise}}. Primarily mainstream [[Shaftonist democracy|Shaftonist democrats]], Reform SRs may also be identified with {{wp|conservative liberalism}}, {{wp|Christian democracy}}, {{wp|neoconservatism}}, and {{wp|radical centrism}}. | ||
<!-- Development and subsidies to high-tech industry, investment; Contemporary ordoliberalism --> | |||
====Housing Policy==== | |||
A constant plank of the federal SRA platform has been reducing the federal government's remaining involvement in housing policy, with the goal of returning this portfolio to full provincial control by ending federal subsidies and other supportive-competence programmes. | |||
===Foreign Policy=== | ===Foreign Policy=== | ||