Crown Liberalism: Difference between revisions

Jump to navigation Jump to search
m
no edit summary
mNo edit summary
mNo edit summary
 
Line 1: Line 1:
{{wip}}
{{wip}}


'''Crown Liberalism''' is a semi-{{wp|liberalism|liberal}} philosophy and political ideology originating in [[Urcea]] based on {{wp|consent of the governed}}, {{wp|Reform movement|gradual reform}}, and the establishment of a government "guided by but not limited to" non-elected authorities such as the [[Apostolic King of Urcea]] or [[Catholic Church]]. Crown Liberalism is considered to be {{wp|fusionist}}, embracing core liberal principles such as the {{wp|social contract}} and {{wp|individual rights}} while accepting the necessity of public stability and opposing political {{wp|radicalism}}. It is similar to [[Organicism]] - or its application - inasmuch as Crown Liberalism emphasizes reform and continuity, but disagrees on questions of {{wp|social contract}} and class distinctions, as Crown Liberalism is viewed by many to be a definitively {{wp|bourgeoisie}} ideology. The philosophy has been described by the [[Kiravia|Kiravian]] scholar [[P. G. W. Gelema]] "a movement aimed at creating the maximum degree of liberty and mobility for the individual and the family with the minimum degree of instability".
'''Crown Liberalism''' is a semi-{{wp|liberalism|liberal}} philosophy and political ideology originating in [[Urcea]] based on {{wp|consent of the governed}}, {{wp|Reform movement|gradual reform}}, and the establishment of a government "guided by but not limited to" non-elected authorities such as the [[Apostolic King of Urcea]] or [[Catholic Church]]. Crown Liberalism is considered to be {{wp|fusionist}}, embracing core liberal principles such as the {{wp|social contract}} and {{wp|individual rights}} while accepting the necessity of public stability and opposing political {{wp|radicalism}}. It is similar to [[Organicism]] in application inasmuch as Crown Liberalism emphasizes reform and continuity, but major disagreements between Crown Liberalism and Organicism exist on basic issues such as {{wp|social contract}} and class distinctions, as Crown Liberalism is viewed by many to be a definitively {{wp|bourgeoisie}} ideology. The philosophy has been described by the [[Kiravia|Kiravian]] scholar [[P. G. W. Gelema]] "a movement aimed at creating the maximum degree of liberty and mobility for the individual and the family with the minimum degree of instability".
 
In terms of its philosophical origin, Crown Liberalism has largely been traced back to {{wp|absolutist}} notions in [[Urcea]] regarding the {{wp|social contract}} between the [[Apostolic King of Urcea|Apostolic King]] and [[Urcean people]]. Philosophers and scholars have noted that Crown Liberalism's primary argument is that the Apostolic King was given authority from above and from a social contract to rule [[Urcea]], and that the [[Constitution of Urcea]] ultimately originates as an irrevocable free grant from the Crown that modifies the social contract. This theory of governance was best expressed in the [[Great Bull of 1811]].


==History==
==History==


===Origins===
===Origins===
Crown Liberalism finds its origins in the late 18th century in the period immediately following the [[War of the Caroline Succession]]. The introduction of liberal thought was of great interest to young high society [[Social class in Urcea|optimates]], who began to patronize liberal philosophers and thinkers. With this patronage came specific thoughts from optimate families, integrating ideas from [[Culture_of_Urcea#Politics_and_statecraft|traditional Urcean political thought]] to create a brand of liberalism specific to [[Urcea]]. Though optimates were responsible for the initial introduction and spread of Crown Liberal thought, by the 1780s a new wage of [[Social class in Urcea|privilegiata]] from the city, partly influenced by mercantile ties to the emerging liberal [[Burgundie|Burgoignesc]] principalities, pushed it forward. Several of these privilegiata, who belonged to the highest ranks of that class, were members of the [[Concilium Daoni]]. In [[1791]], they established the "National Pact for the Settlement of the Constitution", a political club supporting continued development of the [[Constitution of Urcea]]. This club would become the [[National Pact (Urcea)|National Pact]], Urcea's oldest political party and the first Crown Liberal party.
Crown Liberalism finds its origins in the late 18th century in the period immediately following the [[War of the Caroline Succession]]. The introduction of liberal thought was of great interest to young high society [[Social class in Urcea|optimates]], who began to patronize liberal philosophers and thinkers. With this patronage came specific thoughts from optimate families, integrating ideas from [[Culture_of_Urcea#Politics_and_statecraft|traditional Urcean political thought]] to create a brand of liberalism specific to [[Urcea]] which most historians argue developed from an earlier form of {{wp|enlightened absolutism}}. Though optimates were responsible for the initial introduction and spread of Crown Liberal thought, by the 1780s a new wage of [[Social class in Urcea|privilegiata]] from the city, partly influenced by mercantile ties to the emerging liberal [[Burgundie|Burgoignesc]] principalities, pushed it forward. Several of these privilegiata, who belonged to the highest ranks of that class, were members of the [[Concilium Daoni]]. In [[1791]], they established the "National Pact for the Settlement of the Constitution", a political club supporting continued development of the [[Constitution of Urcea]]. This club would become the [[National Pact (Urcea)|National Pact]], Urcea's oldest political party and the first Crown Liberal party.


==Ideology==
==Ideology==

Navigation menu