13,404
edits
Family Living Act of 2003: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m
→Criticism and opposition
m (→Impact) |
|||
| Line 48: | Line 48: | ||
==Criticism and opposition== | ==Criticism and opposition== | ||
===Cost=== | |||
===Effects on housing stock=== | |||
===Government overreach=== | |||
In addition to objections to the content of the legislation, opponents of the Family Living Act also argued that such a sweeping mandate related to housing and planning violated {{wp|Home rule in the United States|municipal home rule}}. This argument contended that zoning and planning had traditionally been the domain of local and provincial governments, and for the first time the Concilium Daoni was infringing on their traditional rights. | |||
[[Category: Urcea]] | [[Category: Urcea]] | ||
[[Category: Laws of Urcea]] | [[Category: Laws of Urcea]] | ||