4,331
edits
Supreme Court of Cartadania: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m
no edit summary
m (→See also) |
mNo edit summary |
||
| Line 28: | Line 28: | ||
Following the 1618 establishment of the Odridian Confederation, there was no central apex court. It was suggested that the government establish such a court to alleviate issues that could not, without bias, be solved by the state courts. This suggestion, however, was dismissed due to concerns about the costs of establishing a centrally located court and the cost and time associated with traveling from more distant states. In 1671, the constitution that formed the current republic mandated the creation of a central court with jurisdiction over disputes between states, federal law, the constitutionality of laws, and original jurisdiction over all cases affecting Ambassadors, other public Ministers and Consuls, and those in which a state shall be a party, though it did have as much power as it does today. | Following the 1618 establishment of the Odridian Confederation, there was no central apex court. It was suggested that the government establish such a court to alleviate issues that could not, without bias, be solved by the state courts. This suggestion, however, was dismissed due to concerns about the costs of establishing a centrally located court and the cost and time associated with traveling from more distant states. In 1671, the constitution that formed the current republic mandated the creation of a central court with jurisdiction over disputes between states, federal law, the constitutionality of laws, and original jurisdiction over all cases affecting Ambassadors, other public Ministers and Consuls, and those in which a state shall be a party, though it did have as much power as it does today. | ||
The early Supreme Court was very limited in scope and was seated by justices from state supreme courts in rotating order for a set amount of time (typically 1-2 years each). This was the precedent unchallenged for nearly thirty years. In the events leading to the Ano | The early Supreme Court was very limited in scope and was seated by justices from state supreme courts in rotating order for a set amount of time (typically 1-2 years each). This was the precedent unchallenged for nearly thirty years. In the events leading to the Ano Vermelho, the supreme court routinely declined cases, instead referring them back down to lower courts due to lack of certain powers, since the president still held partial judicial power, and due to affiliation between some state justices and the individuals in power. Thusly, in the 1710 revision of the [[Constitution of Cartadania]], Congress stripped the president of all judicial powers, transferring them to the court. This also increased the number of Justices from five to nine, where it sits today. | ||
Though allowing the court to travel between locations to hear cases closer to their origin has been considered for many years, when the current building was established in the early 20th century, the court elected to sit permanently in Alahuela, assuming no mandatory movement is necessary. | Though allowing the court to travel between locations to hear cases closer to their origin has been considered for many years, when the current building was established in the early 20th century, the court elected to sit permanently in Alahuela, assuming no mandatory movement is necessary. | ||