6,573
edits
Kiravian Development Executive: Difference between revisions
Kiravian Development Executive (view source)
Revision as of 17:40, 9 December 2023
, 9 December 2023→Inclusive Development Office
m (→Notes) |
|||
| Line 103: | Line 103: | ||
Inherited from the Kiravian Union as the Interior Development Office, the IDO has been a political (if mostly rhetorical) lightning rod in the larger public debate about the policy significance of ethnic/caste/communal groups under liberalism. The [[Shaftonist-Republican Alliance]], grounded in the ''[[Glossary_of_Coscivian_Terms#Dh|dhianbrikorisēn]]'' of the [[Renaissance Party]] and increasingly perceived in recent decades as representing higher caste interests, has often railed against the agency but has not moved to abolish the IDO despite its long-term political dominance. The [[Coscivian National Congress]], which has a strong voter base among the lower castes, has defended the IDO and its budget from SRA cuts even as a coalition partner. Customary leaders, Urom activists, traditionalist commentators, and some socialists have criticised the IDO's development philosophy and rating criteria as reflective of urban, bourgeois, and upper-caste biases and denigrating towards manual labour and traditional economies. | Inherited from the Kiravian Union as the Interior Development Office, the IDO has been a political (if mostly rhetorical) lightning rod in the larger public debate about the policy significance of ethnic/caste/communal groups under liberalism. The [[Shaftonist-Republican Alliance]], grounded in the ''[[Glossary_of_Coscivian_Terms#Dh|dhianbrikorisēn]]'' of the [[Renaissance Party]] and increasingly perceived in recent decades as representing higher caste interests, has often railed against the agency but has not moved to abolish the IDO despite its long-term political dominance. The [[Coscivian National Congress]], which has a strong voter base among the lower castes, has defended the IDO and its budget from SRA cuts even as a coalition partner. Customary leaders, Urom activists, traditionalist commentators, and some socialists have criticised the IDO's development philosophy and rating criteria as reflective of urban, bourgeois, and upper-caste biases and denigrating towards manual labour and traditional economies. | ||
===Land Bank of Kirav=== | |||
The '''Land Bank of Kirav''' (Coscivian: ''Homatærelix Mēntiuv Kiravsk'') is a {{wp|government-sponsored enterprise}} chartered by the [[Federal Stanora|Rump Stanora]] during the [[Kiravian Sunderance|Sunderance]] to handle real estate and agricultural credit, in support of the government's {{wp|land reform}}, housing, and agricultural policies and overall state-driven national economic development efforts | |||
==Notes== | ==Notes== | ||