7,135
edits
Three Kiravs Model: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m
no edit summary
mNo edit summary |
mNo edit summary |
||
| Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
Sanikoren’s original version of the model was based on consumer-side concerns, with a focus on lifestyles and living standards. Sanikoren took variables such as domestic appliance ownership, domestic sanitation, style of dress and penetration of foreign consumer brands (from retail data), and household energy sources, as emblematic of what he termed “these three countries in a single realm” ( ''kírux kētaktai þūviārkē'' ). | Sanikoren’s original version of the model was based on consumer-side concerns, with a focus on lifestyles and living standards. Sanikoren took variables such as domestic appliance ownership, domestic sanitation, style of dress and penetration of foreign consumer brands (from retail data), and household energy sources, as emblematic of what he termed “these three countries in a single realm” ( ''kírux kētaktai þūviārkē'' ). | ||
Sanikoren observed that while residents of First Kirav metropolitan areas had attained a standard of living comparable to the median household in [[Æonara]], [[Burgundie]], [[Fiannria]], or [[Alstin]] by most metrics, residents of most metropolitan areas outside of the First Kirav "corridors of prosperity" lagged behind the median [[Levantine Union]] household in many metrics but remained within the bounds for the developed world. At the same time, Sanikoren found that in much of the remainder of the Kiravian mainland living standards and consumer behaviour tracked closer to what would be expected of a {{wp|newly industrialised country}} or {{wp|emerging market}} economy. | |||
<br> | <br> | ||
<br> | <br> | ||