7,135
edits
Sydona: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m
no edit summary
mNo edit summary |
mNo edit summary |
||
| Line 93: | Line 93: | ||
During the early 20th century AD, socialist movements that had taken root in Great Kirav in response to the poor conditions of the labouring classes spread to Sydona. Here the socialist message was more warmly received among the large Sydonan mineral and industrial workforce, in contrast to other Kiravian colonies, which tended to be more agrarian and commercial. The unequal and highly concentrated ownership of land, particularly on Yerduran, also lent socialism some appeal in the countryside. | During the early 20th century AD, socialist movements that had taken root in Great Kirav in response to the poor conditions of the labouring classes spread to Sydona. Here the socialist message was more warmly received among the large Sydonan mineral and industrial workforce, in contrast to other Kiravian colonies, which tended to be more agrarian and commercial. The unequal and highly concentrated ownership of land, particularly on Yerduran, also lent socialism some appeal in the countryside. | ||
To the [[1934 Constitutional Convention]] Sydona elected two delegates off the Communist list, nine off various Socialist lists, five off the {{wp|Catholic social teaching|Catholic Social}} list, one off the Thračician list, two off Rightist lists, and three off other lists. | |||
====Sydonan Civil War==== | ====Sydonan Civil War==== | ||
After the dissolution of the | After the dissolution of the Constitutional Convention and the outbreak of civil war in Great Kirav, the same quickly occurred in Sydona. The Sydonan Civil war may be (and is) analysed as either a remote theatre of the [[Kiravian Civil War]] or as a related but functionally independent conflict; in either case the Sydonan Civil war was more factionally complex, proportionally deadlier, and longer-lasting than its mainland Kiravian counterpart. | ||
The agrarian, traditionalist outermost isles (Mar-Kśaver and Manētuva), with their more Coscivian populations, were firm in their allegiance to the Federalists and later the Kiravian Remnant. The multiëthnic industrial cities and mining towns were Socialist strongholds. Everywhere else in the archipelago was contested betweent the Federalist and unitary Socialist forces, as well as various ethnic nationalist militia diverse in their ideological leanings. Nonaligned, apolitical peasant self-defence militia groups also participated in the conflict. | The agrarian, traditionalist outermost isles (Mar-Kśaver and Manētuva), with their more Coscivian populations, were firm in their allegiance to the Federalists and later the Kiravian Remnant. The multiëthnic industrial cities and mining towns were Socialist strongholds. Everywhere else in the archipelago was contested betweent the Federalist and unitary Socialist forces, as well as various ethnic nationalist militia diverse in their ideological leanings. Nonaligned, apolitical peasant self-defence militia groups also participated in the conflict. | ||