Talk:National Army Naval Forces (Faneria): Difference between revisions
mNo edit summary |
mNo edit summary |
||
(7 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Early Naval Forces | |||
Royal Navy | |||
During the later half of the 19th century, the Royal Navy adopted a construction and fleet composition strategy called the 2:1 Plan, which heavily favored regional dominance within the Vandarch Sea instead of seriously challenging foreign great powers on the open ocean. | |||
Civil War | |||
During the Fhainnin Civil War, the Royal Navy initially sided with the Royalists, as the fleet was a point of pride for the Throne and sailors were not subjected to much difficulty or combat during the Fourth Kin War. Naval assets conducted bombardments of rebel positions along the shore and even up the Rhydwel, but were unable to stop the overrunning of their bases, leading the fleet elements within the Vandarch to seek clemency or defect to other countries around the sea, namely Hendalarsk and Eldmora-Regulus. | |||
The Republicans were eager to retain as much of the fleet as possible, but were unable to stop the defection of the majority of the High Seas Fleet, forcing a major reconstruction and retraining project in the following decades. | |||
Revolutionary Peoples' Army Naval Service | |||
Under the RPAN, Fhainnin naval forces changed significantly, with the defection of several ships to other nations becoming an issue as the navy lost many skilled crew to Royalists, many of which fled the country and did not return even after blanket pardons were handed out. As a result, the RPAN was in disarray, as while its new equipment was par with its expected opponents, the officers and crews in charge spent most of the 1910s simply organizing themselves and re-learning how to perform operations. | |||
After 1922 and the rebranding of the RPAN as the Army Naval Bureau, a series of live fire gunnery practices using outdated hulks, along with numerous practice sorties, brought the navy back into some standing. By 1930, the fleet was in stable condition, albeit with a larger compliment of small surface vessels and 6 dreadnaught-battleships compared to the 15 pre-dreadnaughts and 7 dreadnaughts of the Royal Navy before the Revolution. This was partly due to the last Royal dreadnought in service being converted to a prototype aircraft carrier, copying the Urcean experiments of the late 1920s with converted ships, and partly due to the desire to focus on mine warfare due to the dense island environment of the southern Vandarch, where the first confrontation with any HLE naval elements would take place in the event of war. | |||
Second Great War | |||
Postwar Reorganization | |||
1978 Reforms | |||
Modern Day | |||
The modern Naval Bureau performs several major roles, mainly involving support operations near colonial possessions and protecting metropolitan Faneria. It acts as an antipiracy force, a cargo and supply carrier, and combat force, and natively hosts its own fleet of icebreakers that are often deployed alongside civilian shipping in the Nordska and Kilikas. | |||
Going into the second quarter of the century, the composition of the Army naval service is changing as older, larger warships become slightly less prominent compared to a larger force of smaller surface combatants. While the light support carrier doctrine employed by the Army remains a key point in Fhainnin strategy within the Vandarch Sea and in its littoral waters along the open ocean, budget cuts and the lack of a serious neighboring rival make lobbying for a larger navy a weak political position. Currently, the Army plans to phase out much of its older surface fleet in favor of modern designs. While the total number of heavy surface combatants will drop, a larger array of small vessels is planned. Forays into missile boats in particular are in vogue for white-water operations, though the overall trend in modern naval design is a greater integration of air assets with naval ones, as evidenced by the fact that the vast majority of new designs take landing pads into account compared to older Fhainnin designs, many of which lagged behind in this area. | Going into the second quarter of the century, the composition of the Army naval service is changing as older, larger warships become slightly less prominent compared to a larger force of smaller surface combatants. While the light support carrier doctrine employed by the Army remains a key point in Fhainnin strategy within the Vandarch Sea and in its littoral waters along the open ocean, budget cuts and the lack of a serious neighboring rival make lobbying for a larger navy a weak political position. Currently, the Army plans to phase out much of its older surface fleet in favor of modern designs. While the total number of heavy surface combatants will drop, a larger array of small vessels is planned. Forays into missile boats in particular are in vogue for white-water operations, though the overall trend in modern naval design is a greater integration of air assets with naval ones, as evidenced by the fact that the vast majority of new designs take landing pads into account compared to older Fhainnin designs, many of which lagged behind in this area. | ||
Line 102: | Line 31: | ||
Technologically, a majority of the fleet is second-line, or constructed between 1980 and 2010, with roughly fifteen percent of its ships being newer and another ten percent or so being constructed prior to 1980. This ageing has made for a considerable cost in maintenance and refits to keep the fleet operational. The main symptom of this was the production of smaller missile boats meant for mass production in the 1970's, bloating the fleet with over fifty light vessels in line with the posturing the navy preferred. In 2012, policy was changed to reflect a growing budget and need to maintain a technological edge rather than rely on dated equipment, demanding that naval production focus on role-dedicated destroyers and air power over the previous cruiser-centered model, along with the discontinuation of later missile boat programs and reforms in the design and planning process. | Technologically, a majority of the fleet is second-line, or constructed between 1980 and 2010, with roughly fifteen percent of its ships being newer and another ten percent or so being constructed prior to 1980. This ageing has made for a considerable cost in maintenance and refits to keep the fleet operational. The main symptom of this was the production of smaller missile boats meant for mass production in the 1970's, bloating the fleet with over fifty light vessels in line with the posturing the navy preferred. In 2012, policy was changed to reflect a growing budget and need to maintain a technological edge rather than rely on dated equipment, demanding that naval production focus on role-dedicated destroyers and air power over the previous cruiser-centered model, along with the discontinuation of later missile boat programs and reforms in the design and planning process. | ||
*{{wp|Novara-class cruiser}} | |||
*{{wp|Erzherzog Karl-class battleship}} | |||
*{{wp|250t-class torpedo boat}} | |||
*{{wp|Huszár-class destroyer}} | |||
*{{wp|Tátra-class destroyer}} | |||
*{{wp|Kaiman-class torpedo boat}} | |||
*{{wp|Cobra-class torpedo boat}} | |||
*{{wp|Russian destroyer Novik (1911)}} | |||
*{{wp|Ognevoy-class destroyer}} | |||
*{{wp|Finnish coastal defence ship Väinämöinen}} | |||
*{{wp|Zenta-class cruiser}} | |||
*{{wp|Kynda-class cruiser}} | |||
*{{wp|Kresta I-class cruiser}} | |||
*{{wp|Kresta II-class cruiser}} | |||
*{{wp|Sverdlov-class cruiser}} | |||
*{{wp|Kara-class cruiser}} | |||
*{{wp|Slava-class cruiser}} | |||
*{{wp|Kashin-class destroyer}} | |||
*{{wp|Udaloy-class destroyer}} | |||
*{{wp|Sovremenny-class destroyer}} | |||
*{{wp|Riga-class frigate}} | |||
*{{wp|Ropucha-class landing ship}} | |||
*{{wp|Neustrashimyy-class frigate}} | |||
*{{wp|Grisha-class corvette}} | |||
*{{wp|Moskva-class helicopter carrier}} | |||
*{{wp|Kiev-class aircraft carrier}} | |||
*{{wp|Kuznetsov-class aircraft carrier}} | |||
= | {| class="wikitable sortable mw-collapsible" | ||
[[ | |+ | ||
[[ | !IRL Class | ||
[[ | !IRL Full Load Displacement | ||
[[ | !IRL Years | ||
!IC Class | |||
!IC Dimensions | |||
!IC Years | |||
!Images | |||
|- | |||
|{{wp|Cobra-class torpedo boat}} | |||
|135 t (133 long tons) | |||
| | |||
*Produced: 1890s | |||
*Service: 1890s-1919 | |||
| | |||
| | |||
| | |||
| | |||
|- | |||
|{{wp|Zenta-class cruiser}} | |||
|2,503 long tons (2,543 t) | |||
| | |||
*Produced: 1896–1901 | |||
*Service: 1899–1918 | |||
| | |||
| | |||
| | |||
| | |||
|- | |||
|{{wp|Erzherzog Karl-class battleship}} | |||
|10,472 long tons (10,640 t) | |||
| | |||
*Produced: 1902–07 | |||
*Service: 1906–1918 | |||
| | |||
| | |||
| | |||
| | |||
|- | |||
|{{wp|Huszár-class destroyer}} | |||
|420 t (410 long tons) | |||
| | |||
*Produced: 1905-1909 | |||
*Service: | |||
| | |||
| | |||
| | |||
| | |||
|- | |||
|{{wp|Russian destroyer Novik (1911)}} | |||
|1,590 long tons (1,620 t) | |||
| | |||
*Produced: 1910-1911 | |||
*Service: 1911-1941 | |||
| | |||
| | |||
| | |||
| | |||
|- | |||
|{{wp|Novara-class cruiser}} | |||
|4,417 tonnes (4,347 long tons) | |||
| | |||
*Produced: 1911–1915 | |||
*Service: 1914–1941 | |||
| | |||
| | |||
| | |||
| | |||
|- | |||
|{{wp|Tátra-class destroyer}} | |||
|1,050 long tons (1,070 t) | |||
| | |||
*Produced: 1911–1914 | |||
*Service: 1913–1937 | |||
| | |||
| | |||
| | |||
| | |||
|- | |||
|{{wp|250t-class torpedo boat}} | |||
|320–330 t (315–325 long tons) | |||
| | |||
*Produced: 1913–1916 | |||
*Service: 1914–1963 | |||
| | |||
| | |||
| | |||
| | |||
|- | |||
|{{wp|Kaiman-class torpedo boat}} | |||
|209–211 t (206–208 long tons) | |||
| | |||
*Produced: 1904–1910 | |||
*Service: 1905–1930 | |||
| | |||
| | |||
| | |||
| | |||
|- | |||
|{{wp|Finnish coastal defence ship Väinämöinen}} | |||
|3,900 t | |||
| | |||
*Produced: 1929-1932 | |||
*Service: 1932-1966 | |||
| | |||
| | |||
| | |||
| | |||
|- | |||
|{{wp|Ognevoy-class destroyer}} | |||
|2,860 t (2,810 long tons) | |||
| | |||
*Produced: 1938–1948 | |||
*Service: 1944–1960 | |||
| | |||
| | |||
| | |||
| | |||
|- | |||
|{{wp|Sverdlov-class cruiser}} | |||
|16,640 tonnes (16,377 long tons) | |||
| | |||
*Produced: 1948–1959 | |||
*Service: 1952–2000 | |||
| | |||
| | |||
| | |||
| | |||
|- | |||
|{{wp|Riga-class frigate}} | |||
|1,416 tons | |||
| | |||
*Produced: 1951-1958 | |||
*Service: 1952-1985 | |||
| | |||
| | |||
| | |||
| | |||
|- | |||
|{{wp|Kashin-class destroyer}} | |||
|4,390 tons | |||
| | |||
*Produced: 1959–1986 | |||
*Service: 1962–2020 | |||
| | |||
| | |||
| | |||
| | |||
* [[File:49KashinClassDestroyerMediterraneanJan1970.jpg|150px]] | |||
* [[File:Sderzhannyy1980.jpg|150px]] | |||
* [[File:KrasnyyKavkaz1985.jpg|150px]] | |||
* [[File:Soobrazitelnyy1960-1994(DN-SC-87-01472).jpg|150px]] | |||
* [[File:INS Ranvijay at annual bi-lateral naval field training exercise.jpg|150px]] | |||
* [[File:Slavnyy(DN-SC-86-00986).jpg|150px]] | |||
|- | |||
|{{wp|Kynda-class cruiser}} | |||
|5,500 tons | |||
| | |||
*Produced: 1960–1965 | |||
*Service: 1962–2002 | |||
| | |||
| | |||
| | |||
| | |||
|- | |||
|{{wp|Kresta I-class cruiser}} | |||
|7,500 tons | |||
| | |||
*Produced: 1964–1967 | |||
*Service: 1967–1994 | |||
| | |||
| | |||
| | |||
| | |||
|- | |||
|{{wp|Kresta II-class cruiser}} | |||
|7,535 tons | |||
| | |||
*Produced: 1966–1977 | |||
*Service: 1969–1993 | |||
| | |||
| | |||
| | |||
| | |||
|- | |||
| *{{wp|Grisha-class corvette}} | |||
|1,070 tons | |||
| | |||
*Produced: 1966-1981 | |||
*Service: 1970-present | |||
| | |||
| | |||
| | |||
| | |||
*[[File:Project1124M-1990-1.jpg|150px]] | |||
*[[File:Ternopil (ship, 2002).jpg|150px]] | |||
|- | |||
|{{wp|Kara-class cruiser}} | |||
|9,700 tons | |||
| | |||
*Produced: 1968–1979 | |||
*Service: 1971–2014 | |||
| | |||
| | |||
| | |||
| | |||
|- | |||
|{{wp|Slava-class cruiser}} | |||
|11,490 tons | |||
| | |||
*Produced: 1976–1990 | |||
*Service: 1982–present | |||
| | |||
| | |||
| | |||
| | |||
|- | |||
|{{wp|Udaloy-class destroyer}} | |||
|7,570 tons | |||
| | |||
*Produced: 1977–1994 | |||
*Service: 1980–present | |||
| | |||
| | |||
| | |||
| | |||
* [[File:AdmiralSpiridonov1986.jpg|150px]] | |||
* [[File:Russian navy anti-submarine ship Severomorsk.jpg|150px]] | |||
* [[File:RFNS Admiral Levchenko DDG-605.jpg|150px]] | |||
|- | |||
|{{wp|Sovremenny-class destroyer}} | |||
|8,000 tons | |||
| | |||
*Produced: 1976–2004 | |||
*Service: 1980–present | |||
| | |||
| | |||
| | |||
| | |||
* [[File:Boevoy1987Yaponskoe-more.jpg|150px]] | |||
* [[File:Stoykiy.jpg|150px]] | |||
* [[File:Destroyer Okrylenny.jpg|150px]] | |||
* [[File:Rastoropnyy&O'Bannon1992.jpg|150px]] | |||
* [[File:Destroyer Bezuderzhnyy.jpg|150px]] | |||
* [[File:HydrocosmosEra2019-01.jpg|150px]] | |||
|- | |||
|{{wp|Ropucha-class landing ship}} | |||
| | |||
| | |||
*Produced: | |||
*Service: | |||
| | |||
| | |||
| | |||
| | |||
|- | |||
|{{wp|Neustrashimyy-class frigate}} | |||
|4,400 tons | |||
| | |||
*Produced: 1986–present | |||
*Service: | |||
| | |||
| | |||
| | |||
| | |||
* [[File:Frigate Neustrashimy (FF 712) 188.jpg|150px]] | |||
|- | |||
|{{wp|Moskva-class helicopter carrier}} | |||
| | |||
| | |||
*Produced: | |||
*Service: | |||
| | |||
| | |||
| | |||
| | |||
|- | |||
|{{wp|Kiev-class aircraft carrier}} | |||
| | |||
| | |||
*Produced: | |||
*Service: | |||
| | |||
| | |||
| | |||
| | |||
|- | |||
|{{wp|Kuznetsov-class aircraft carrier}} | |||
| | |||
| | |||
*Produced: | |||
*Service: | |||
| | |||
| | |||
| | |||
| | |||
|- | |||
| | |||
|*Draft: | |||
*Beam: | |||
*Length: | |||
*Displacement: | |||
| | |||
| | |||
| | |||
| | |||
| | |||
|} |
Latest revision as of 19:48, 27 September 2022
Early Naval Forces Royal Navy
During the later half of the 19th century, the Royal Navy adopted a construction and fleet composition strategy called the 2:1 Plan, which heavily favored regional dominance within the Vandarch Sea instead of seriously challenging foreign great powers on the open ocean.
Civil War
During the Fhainnin Civil War, the Royal Navy initially sided with the Royalists, as the fleet was a point of pride for the Throne and sailors were not subjected to much difficulty or combat during the Fourth Kin War. Naval assets conducted bombardments of rebel positions along the shore and even up the Rhydwel, but were unable to stop the overrunning of their bases, leading the fleet elements within the Vandarch to seek clemency or defect to other countries around the sea, namely Hendalarsk and Eldmora-Regulus.
The Republicans were eager to retain as much of the fleet as possible, but were unable to stop the defection of the majority of the High Seas Fleet, forcing a major reconstruction and retraining project in the following decades.
Revolutionary Peoples' Army Naval Service
Under the RPAN, Fhainnin naval forces changed significantly, with the defection of several ships to other nations becoming an issue as the navy lost many skilled crew to Royalists, many of which fled the country and did not return even after blanket pardons were handed out. As a result, the RPAN was in disarray, as while its new equipment was par with its expected opponents, the officers and crews in charge spent most of the 1910s simply organizing themselves and re-learning how to perform operations.
After 1922 and the rebranding of the RPAN as the Army Naval Bureau, a series of live fire gunnery practices using outdated hulks, along with numerous practice sorties, brought the navy back into some standing. By 1930, the fleet was in stable condition, albeit with a larger compliment of small surface vessels and 6 dreadnaught-battleships compared to the 15 pre-dreadnaughts and 7 dreadnaughts of the Royal Navy before the Revolution. This was partly due to the last Royal dreadnought in service being converted to a prototype aircraft carrier, copying the Urcean experiments of the late 1920s with converted ships, and partly due to the desire to focus on mine warfare due to the dense island environment of the southern Vandarch, where the first confrontation with any HLE naval elements would take place in the event of war.
Second Great War Postwar Reorganization 1978 Reforms Modern Day
The modern Naval Bureau performs several major roles, mainly involving support operations near colonial possessions and protecting metropolitan Faneria. It acts as an antipiracy force, a cargo and supply carrier, and combat force, and natively hosts its own fleet of icebreakers that are often deployed alongside civilian shipping in the Nordska and Kilikas.
Going into the second quarter of the century, the composition of the Army naval service is changing as older, larger warships become slightly less prominent compared to a larger force of smaller surface combatants. While the light support carrier doctrine employed by the Army remains a key point in Fhainnin strategy within the Vandarch Sea and in its littoral waters along the open ocean, budget cuts and the lack of a serious neighboring rival make lobbying for a larger navy a weak political position. Currently, the Army plans to phase out much of its older surface fleet in favor of modern designs. While the total number of heavy surface combatants will drop, a larger array of small vessels is planned. Forays into missile boats in particular are in vogue for white-water operations, though the overall trend in modern naval design is a greater integration of air assets with naval ones, as evidenced by the fact that the vast majority of new designs take landing pads into account compared to older Fhainnin designs, many of which lagged behind in this area.
Modern Fanerian battlegroup composition segregates tasks into distinct roles for each ship - primarily air defense, mine and antisubmarine warfare, surface warfare, and air support. Generally, any ship can perform multiple roles, but each specializes in a particular field and is expected to operate in that role unless circumstances require otherwise.
Ship design is typically funneled into a single production model, with a great deal of competition between design variants. The design process for lighter Fhainnin vessels also involves prototype construction and testing, and increasingly involves computer simulations as well. The army has displayed gaps in its production lines between ship classes over the years, indicating an ad-hoc design process. It is currently believed that the army is conducting panels to standardize the design process further to create some overlap and ensure regular updates to the naval service's assets.
Technologically, a majority of the fleet is second-line, or constructed between 1980 and 2010, with roughly fifteen percent of its ships being newer and another ten percent or so being constructed prior to 1980. This ageing has made for a considerable cost in maintenance and refits to keep the fleet operational. The main symptom of this was the production of smaller missile boats meant for mass production in the 1970's, bloating the fleet with over fifty light vessels in line with the posturing the navy preferred. In 2012, policy was changed to reflect a growing budget and need to maintain a technological edge rather than rely on dated equipment, demanding that naval production focus on role-dedicated destroyers and air power over the previous cruiser-centered model, along with the discontinuation of later missile boat programs and reforms in the design and planning process.
- Novara-class cruiser
- Erzherzog Karl-class battleship
- 250t-class torpedo boat
- Huszár-class destroyer
- Tátra-class destroyer
- Kaiman-class torpedo boat
- Cobra-class torpedo boat
- Russian destroyer Novik (1911)
- Ognevoy-class destroyer
- Finnish coastal defence ship Väinämöinen
- Zenta-class cruiser
- Kynda-class cruiser
- Kresta I-class cruiser
- Kresta II-class cruiser
- Sverdlov-class cruiser
- Kara-class cruiser
- Slava-class cruiser
- Kashin-class destroyer
- Udaloy-class destroyer
- Sovremenny-class destroyer
- Riga-class frigate
- Ropucha-class landing ship
- Neustrashimyy-class frigate
- Grisha-class corvette
- Moskva-class helicopter carrier
- Kiev-class aircraft carrier
- Kuznetsov-class aircraft carrier
IRL Class | IRL Full Load Displacement | IRL Years | IC Class | IC Dimensions | IC Years | Images |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Cobra-class torpedo boat | 135 t (133 long tons) |
|
||||
Zenta-class cruiser | 2,503 long tons (2,543 t) |
|
||||
Erzherzog Karl-class battleship | 10,472 long tons (10,640 t) |
|
||||
Huszár-class destroyer | 420 t (410 long tons) |
|
||||
Russian destroyer Novik (1911) | 1,590 long tons (1,620 t) |
|
||||
Novara-class cruiser | 4,417 tonnes (4,347 long tons) |
|
||||
Tátra-class destroyer | 1,050 long tons (1,070 t) |
|
||||
250t-class torpedo boat | 320–330 t (315–325 long tons) |
|
||||
Kaiman-class torpedo boat | 209–211 t (206–208 long tons) |
|
||||
Finnish coastal defence ship Väinämöinen | 3,900 t |
|
||||
Ognevoy-class destroyer | 2,860 t (2,810 long tons) |
|
||||
Sverdlov-class cruiser | 16,640 tonnes (16,377 long tons) |
|
||||
Riga-class frigate | 1,416 tons |
|
||||
Kashin-class destroyer | 4,390 tons |
|
||||
Kynda-class cruiser | 5,500 tons |
|
||||
Kresta I-class cruiser | 7,500 tons |
|
||||
Kresta II-class cruiser | 7,535 tons |
|
||||
*Grisha-class corvette | 1,070 tons |
|
||||
Kara-class cruiser | 9,700 tons |
|
||||
Slava-class cruiser | 11,490 tons |
|
||||
Udaloy-class destroyer | 7,570 tons |
|
||||
Sovremenny-class destroyer | 8,000 tons |
|
||||
Ropucha-class landing ship |
|
|||||
Neustrashimyy-class frigate | 4,400 tons |
|
||||
Moskva-class helicopter carrier |
|
|||||
Kiev-class aircraft carrier |
|
|||||
Kuznetsov-class aircraft carrier |
|
|||||
*Draft:
|