Kiravian federalism: Difference between revisions
mNo edit summary |
|||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
The [[Kiravian Federacy]] is structured as an {{wp|asymmetric federation}} in which the powers and responsibilities of governance are shared between the '''[[Government of the Kiravian Federacy|federal government]]''' and the governments of the various '''federal subjects''', which include states, territories, and other regional entities. The degree to and manner in which the federal subjects are self-governing varies according to their [[Kiravian federalism#Classes|classification]] and the particular details of their constituting documents. | The [[Kiravian Federacy]] is structured as an {{wp|asymmetric federation}} in which the powers and responsibilities of governance are shared between the '''[[Government of the Kiravian Federacy|federal government]]''' and the governments of the various '''federal subjects''', which include states, territories, and other regional entities, also referred to generically in Ænglish as '''provinces'''. The degree to and manner in which the federal subjects are self-governing varies according to their [[Kiravian federalism#Classes|classification]] and the particular details of their constituting documents. | ||
==History== | ==History== | ||
Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
==Themes== | ==Themes== | ||
The contemporary Kiravian Federacy is organised according to the principle of "thematic federalism" (''glédistralix vuntirisēn''), under which the | The contemporary Kiravian Federacy is organised according to the principle of "thematic federalism" (''glédistralix vuntirisēn''), under which the provinces are divided among groups known as "themes" (Coscivian: ''glédistra''). The themes were instituted under the Restoration Constitution to preserve national cohesion while addressing the differing policy needs of geographically distant regions, and to ensure fair representation of different regions in major political decisions. Themes are not a level of government in their own right and do not have any lawmaking powers. Thematic institutions, where they exist, are purely representative, deliberative, and coördinative. | ||
{| class="wikitable sortable" style="text-align:center;" | {| class="wikitable sortable" style="text-align:center;" | ||
Line 63: | Line 63: | ||
|} | |} | ||
The themes have a constitutional role and are referenced in {{wp|qualified majority voting}} in the federal legislative process and constitutional procedures such as the election of the [[Prime Executive]]. Themes also have a policy role: the Restoration Constitution advises that the application of federal policy should be uniform ''within'' themes as much as is prudent and vary ''among'' themes as much as prudent. Themes are most prominent in policy areas related to the movement of people and goods, as different approaches to migration controls and regulation of inter- | The themes have a constitutional role and are referenced in {{wp|qualified majority voting}} in the federal legislative process and constitutional procedures such as the election of the [[Prime Executive]]. Themes also have a policy role: the Restoration Constitution advises that the application of federal policy should be uniform ''within'' themes as much as is prudent and vary ''among'' themes as much as prudent. Themes are most prominent in policy areas related to the movement of people and goods, as different approaches to migration controls and regulation of inter-provincial commerce have been adopted to accommodate the different development needs and cultural considerations of particular themes. In the ''ōvsix'' ("general") themes - the Federation, Sarolasta, and the Overseas Regions, such policies are set by the federal government and applied on a theme-by-theme (or province-by-province in the Overseas Regions) basis, whereas in the ''elurix'' ("special") themes - South Kirav, Sydona, and the Melian Isles - considerable authority is devolved to the provincial governments within the theme to agree upon a common policy for themselves within constitutional parameters. | ||
Two themes - the Sydonan and the Melian - contain only one | Two themes - the Sydonan and the Melian - contain only one province each. In these "unitary themes", the government of the sole province represents the theme in constitutional procedures and exercises any devolved powers on its own. In most of the remaining themes, termed "federative themes", the constituent subjects create common institutions by {{wp|interstate compact|interprovincial compact}} to carry out these functions. Sarolasta, for example, has a Commonwealth Council of ranking provincial legislators and cabinet officers, and a popularly-elected President who serves as a spokesman and public advocate. The Overseas Regions do not have any common institutions. | ||
==Policy distribution== | ==Policy distribution== | ||
Line 71: | Line 71: | ||
{|class="wikitable" style="text-align:center" | {|class="wikitable" style="text-align:center" | ||
|'''Federal'''||'''Shared'''||''' | |'''Federal'''||'''Shared'''||'''Provincial''' | ||
|- | |- | ||
| | | |
Revision as of 11:41, 13 June 2022
The Kiravian Federacy is structured as an asymmetric federation in which the powers and responsibilities of governance are shared between the federal government and the governments of the various federal subjects, which include states, territories, and other regional entities, also referred to generically in Ænglish as provinces. The degree to and manner in which the federal subjects are self-governing varies according to their classification and the particular details of their constituting documents.
History
Under the Confederal Republics of Kirav, the purview of Confederal government was quite narrow, mainly limited to maintaining a common currency, enforcing customs, defensive works and raising armies in times of war, diplomatic and Aboriginal relations, and running the Navy and postal service. The first Federal constitution significantly expanded the domestic power of the federal government, but largely maintained the assignment of the high politics of national security and foreign affairs to the federal government and the low politics of economic and social affairs to the states and territories. During the 20th century AD, the technological and economic changes of high modernity, as well as parallel developments in the Kiravian Remnant and Kiravian Union permanently disrupted the cleanly-delineated layer-cake model of Kiravian federalism. On the territory of the Kiravian Union, federalism was abolished. In the Kiravian Remnant, federalism was preserved, but the central government assumed a dramatically more powerful role in domestic affairs in order to maintain the rump federation's survival. The Restoration renewed public interest in subsidiarity and regional self-governance, but also a greater demand for regional parity and integrated economic development, resulting in the current arrangement of thematic and coöperative federalism.
Themes
The contemporary Kiravian Federacy is organised according to the principle of "thematic federalism" (glédistralix vuntirisēn), under which the provinces are divided among groups known as "themes" (Coscivian: glédistra). The themes were instituted under the Restoration Constitution to preserve national cohesion while addressing the differing policy needs of geographically distant regions, and to ensure fair representation of different regions in major political decisions. Themes are not a level of government in their own right and do not have any lawmaking powers. Thematic institutions, where they exist, are purely representative, deliberative, and coördinative.
Flag | Theme | Type | Class | Population (2030 Census) | GDP/capita |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Federation of Kiravian States | Federative | General | X,000,000 | Y,000 | |
Commonwealth of Sarolasta | Federative | General | X,000,000 | Y,000 | |
Sydonan People's Republic | Unitary | Special | X,000,000 | Y,000 | |
Melian Archipelagic Republic | Unitary | Special | X,000,000 | Y,000 | |
South Kirav | Federative | Special | X,000,000 | Y,000 | |
Overseas Regions | neuter | General | X,000,000 | Y,000 |
The themes have a constitutional role and are referenced in qualified majority voting in the federal legislative process and constitutional procedures such as the election of the Prime Executive. Themes also have a policy role: the Restoration Constitution advises that the application of federal policy should be uniform within themes as much as is prudent and vary among themes as much as prudent. Themes are most prominent in policy areas related to the movement of people and goods, as different approaches to migration controls and regulation of inter-provincial commerce have been adopted to accommodate the different development needs and cultural considerations of particular themes. In the ōvsix ("general") themes - the Federation, Sarolasta, and the Overseas Regions, such policies are set by the federal government and applied on a theme-by-theme (or province-by-province in the Overseas Regions) basis, whereas in the elurix ("special") themes - South Kirav, Sydona, and the Melian Isles - considerable authority is devolved to the provincial governments within the theme to agree upon a common policy for themselves within constitutional parameters.
Two themes - the Sydonan and the Melian - contain only one province each. In these "unitary themes", the government of the sole province represents the theme in constitutional procedures and exercises any devolved powers on its own. In most of the remaining themes, termed "federative themes", the constituent subjects create common institutions by interprovincial compact to carry out these functions. Sarolasta, for example, has a Commonwealth Council of ranking provincial legislators and cabinet officers, and a popularly-elected President who serves as a spokesman and public advocate. The Overseas Regions do not have any common institutions.
Policy distribution
Although not strictly accurate only quasi-accurate at best, the following table from a Kiravian Vision Foundation white paper provides a decent introduction to the topic placeholder until a better visual aid is available:
Federal | Shared | Provincial |
|
|
Classes
Provinces
Non-territorial federal subjects
Fiscal federalism
The taxation régime in the KF is structured to ensure that the provinces have a sufficient independent domestic revenue base to finance good governance, while also providing adequate funding for common purposes such as national defence and structural support to underdeveloped regions.
Federal government revenue comes primarily from income taxes and customs duties, and secondarily from a selection of excises on interprovincial commerce. Provincial government revenue comes primarily from consumption taxes and land value tax, and secondarily from stamp taxes, and specific duties (e.g. on alcohol, tobacco, firearms, men's magazines, electricity). In some provinces, resource rents contribute significantly to the public coffers.