Liberty Index: Difference between revisions

Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
mNo edit summary
Line 2: Line 2:


something something controversy over biased reporting always an issue, Varshani or someone else raised hell over it, lower nations say it favors Latin-Romance nations and is an attack or so on
something something controversy over biased reporting always an issue, Varshani or someone else raised hell over it, lower nations say it favors Latin-Romance nations and is an attack or so on
{| class="wikitable sortable mw-collapsible mw-collapsed"
{| class="wikitable sortable mw-collapsible mw-collapsed"
|+Democracy Index by Country
|+Democracy Index by Country
Line 54: Line 53:
|9.98
|9.98
|10.00
|10.00
|
|9.99
|
|
|-
|-
Line 62: Line 61:
|9.94
|9.94
|10.00
|10.00
|
|9.86
|10.00
|10.00
|10.00
|10.00
Line 74: Line 73:
|9.98
|9.98
|9.97
|9.97
|
|9.85
|
|9.87
|9.99
|9.99
|9.93
|9.93
Line 123: Line 122:
|-
|-
|Burgundie
|Burgundie
|7.8
|7.81
|8.1
|8.19
|8.5
|8.50
|8.8
|8.84
|9.1
|9.12
|9.1
|9.13
|9.0
|9.08
|8.9
|8.98
|9.1
|9.17
|
|9.18
|N/A
|N/A
|-
|-
Line 150: Line 149:
|Cohe
|Cohe
|
|
|
|8.64
|
|
|
|
Line 184: Line 183:
|
|
|8.49
|8.49
|
|8.49
|
|
|-
|-
Line 247: Line 246:
|
|
|
|
|
|7.90
|7.90
|7.90
|
|
Line 266: Line 265:
|-
|-
|Kiravia
|Kiravia
|?
|3.43
|3.92
|3.89
|[[Kirosocialism|3.86]]
|6.89
|6.91
|7.12
|7.09
|7.18
|
|
|-
|Wonjin
|
|
|
|
Line 274: Line 285:
|
|
|
|
|7.09
|
|
|
|7.02
|-
|Wonjin
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|7.02
|
|
|
|
Line 318: Line 317:
|-
|-
|the Cape
|the Cape
| -
| 5.68
|
|5.64
|
|[[1982 Republic Day revolution|4.03]]
|6.38
|6.38
|6.32
|6.32
Line 326: Line 325:
|6.99
|6.99
|6.98
|6.98
|[[2020 Cape Coup|6.33]]
|6.73
|6.73
|
|Attempted Coup (link or name needed) and reaction caused a noticeable drop in 2020.
|Attempted Coup (link or name needed) and reaction caused a noticeable drop in 2020.
|-
|-
Line 489: Line 488:
|
|
|
|
|
|4.12
|
|
|
|
Line 565: Line 564:
|-
|-
|Sabnaki
|Sabnaki
|
| -
|
| -
|
| -
|
| -
|
|
|
|
Line 604: Line 603:
|-
|-
|Algoquona/Algosh Republic
|Algoquona/Algosh Republic
|?
| -
|?
| -
|?
| -
|?
| -
|
| -
|
|2.
|
|2.35
|
|2.34
|2.34
|2.34
|
|4.88
|
|
|-
|-
|Iriquona
|Iriquona
|
| -
|
| -
|
| -
|
| -
|
|4.33
|
|4.06
|
|2.04
|
|2.10
|2.16
|2.16
|
|
Line 648: Line 647:
|2.49
|2.49
|2.45
|2.45
|0.76
|[[Xichi Crackdowns|0.76]]
|1.27
|1.27
|1.38
|1.38
|1.36
|1.36
|
|1.98
|
|
|-
|-
Line 665: Line 664:
|
|
|1.15
|1.15
|
|1.14
|
|
|}
|}
Line 1,972: Line 1,971:
|
|
|}
|}
==History==
==History==
==Controversies==
==Controversies==
The Liberty Index has a long history of dispute, mainly by nations with lower scores or non-Ocidental or Coscivian culture nations. Criticisms of the Liberty Index often center of accusing the Organization for Democracy International of being biased towards Latin and Romance nations, unfairly favoring constitutional monarchies where the monarch retains real powers of government, and occasionally going as far as suggesting the Liberty Index is biased towards donor nations. Counterclaims often point to the inclusion of [[Carna]] in the upper echelons of scoring listings, as well as the fact that non-Latins can suck it.
The Liberty Index has a long history of dispute, mainly by nations with lower scores or non-Ocidental or Coscivian culture nations. Criticisms of the Liberty Index often center of accusing the Organization for Democracy International of being biased towards Latin and Romance nations, unfairly favoring constitutional monarchies where the monarch retains real powers of government, and occasionally going as far as suggesting the Liberty Index is biased towards donor nations. Counterclaims often point to the inclusion of [[Carna]] in the upper echelons of scoring listings, as well as the fact that non-Latins can suck it.