IxWiki

Liberty Index: Difference between revisions

Page Discussion

Liberty Index (view source)

Revision as of 20:41, 23 November 2022

1,397 bytes added ,  23 November 2022
charts incoming + alterations to scoring methodology
VisualWikitext
mNo edit summary
(charts incoming + alterations to scoring methodology)
Line 1: Line 1:
The '''International Liberty Index Foundation''' is a [[League of Nations]]-sanctioned NGO whose goal is the cataloguing of the nations of the world by their traits in relation to democratic norms and liberal values. Founded in 1958 in Cartadania in conjunction with the Organization for Democracy International, the ILIF manages a League-sanctioned set of indexes: the the Democracy Index, the Civil Rights Index, and the Perceived Corruption Index. Each is calculated relative to the global community yearly, with one nation scoring a 10 and setting the benchmark for the year. In addition, the ILIF manages a Global Liberty Index marking fluctuations in the quality of Index Benchmark Nations as well as a Composite Index.
The '''International Liberty Index Foundation''' is a [[League of Nations]]-sanctioned NGO centered on recording and comparing global survey and analytical data to produce comprehensive data for a number of metrics centered around the spread of political freedoms and systems, corruption in governments and societies, social values and norms, and civil rights. Originally founded in 1958 in Cartadania in conjunction with the Organization for Democracy International, the ILIF originally managed a League-sanctioned set of indexes: the the Democracy Index, the Civil Rights Index, and the Perceived Corruption Index. Individually, each is scored to a maximum value of 10, the highest of which sets the year's benchmark. Scores for these indices are also available comparatively between years to show the improvement of benchmark-setters year by year. These are typically shown compiled into a single score in the form of the Liberty Index, a {{wp|norm-referenced test|norm-referenced scoring system}} which provides a relative, simple view of a country's overall social and political freedoms.  


Over time, the ILIF has expanded to cover a number of analytical metrics, absorbing several related NGOs such as the Poverty Tracking Organization. As a result, the ILIF published a number of datasets on global GDP and wellbeing metrics which are used by the League of Nations and other international bodies through annual publications.
Each is calculated relative to the global community yearly, with one nation scoring a 10 and setting the benchmark for the year. In addition, the ILIF manages a Global Liberty Index marking fluctuations in the quality of Index Benchmark Nations as well as a Composite Index.
== Countries by Wealth ==
==== GDP ====
==== GDPPC ====
==== Poverty Rate ====
== Countries by Education and Health ==
==== Life Expectancy ====
==== Mean Years Schooling ====
==== Literacy Rate ====
==== Population Density ====
== Composite Liberty Index ==
Aggregate scores from each decade since 1960 and every five years since 2010 are shown below, and scores as well as individual indexes can be viewed in full on the International Liberty Index Foundation's [[website]].
Aggregate scores from each decade since 1960 and every five years since 2010 are shown below, and scores as well as individual indexes can be viewed in full on the International Liberty Index Foundation's [[website]].
{| class="wikitable sortable mw-collapsible"
{| class="wikitable sortable mw-collapsible mw-collapsed"
|+Composite Liberty Index Scores by Country (Quinquennial)
|+Composite Liberty Index Scores by Country (Quinquennial)
!Nation
!Nation
Line 112: Line 135:
|
|
|-
|-
|[[Ashkenang]]
| [[Ashkenang]]
| -
| -
| -
| -
Line 150: Line 173:
|[[Burgundie]]
|[[Burgundie]]
|7.81
|7.81
|8.19
| 8.19
|8.50
|8.50
|8.84
|8.84
Line 196: Line 219:
|Scores extremely well in perceived corruption index and mediocre in other categories.
|Scores extremely well in perceived corruption index and mediocre in other categories.
|-
|-
|[[Carna]]
| [[Carna]]
|9.98
|9.98
|9.99
|9.99
Line 203: Line 226:
|9.86
|9.86
|10.00
|10.00
|10.00
| 10.00  
|9.98
|9.98
|
|
Line 309: Line 332:
|4.89
|4.89
|4.67
|4.67
|5.81
|5.81  
|5.83
| 5.83
|5.96
|5.96
|6.12
|6.12
Line 340: Line 363:
|
|
|-
|-
|[[Etzil]]
| [[Etzil]]
|8.70
|8.70
|8.73
|8.73
Line 347: Line 370:
|8.84
|8.84
|8.85
|8.85
|8.85
|8.85  
|8.87
|8.87
|
|
Line 359: Line 382:
|6.73
|6.73
|6.94
|6.94
|6.88
| 6.88  
|6.91
|6.91
|7.03
|7.03
Line 424: Line 447:
|Composite score reduced by arbitrary court system and lack of enfranchisement.
|Composite score reduced by arbitrary court system and lack of enfranchisement.
|-
|-
|[[Istrenya]]
| [[Istrenya]]
|
|
|
|
Line 508: Line 531:
|
|
|-
|-
|[[Malentina]]
|[[Malentina]]  
|
|
|
|
Line 532: Line 555:
|
|
|-
|-
|[[Metzetta]]
|[[Metzetta]]  
|
|
|
|
Line 636: Line 659:
|
|
|
|
|8.53
|8.53  
|
|
|
|
Line 659: Line 682:
|5.90
|5.90
|6.05
|6.05
|5.78
|5.78  
|6.01
|6.01
|
|
Line 796: Line 819:
|
|
|-
|-
|[[Telonaticolan]]
|[[Telonaticolan]]  
|
|
|
|
Line 906: Line 929:
|[[Vithinja]]
|[[Vithinja]]
|3.91
|3.91
|4.78
|4.78  
|4.22
|4.22  
|5.42
|5.42  
|6.67
|6.67
|6.12
|6.12
Line 964: Line 987:
|
|
|-
|-
|[[Yanuban]]
| [[Yanuban]]
|
|
|
|
Line 982: Line 1,005:
|8.20
|8.20
|8.30
|8.30
|8.36
| 8.36  
|8.40
|8.40
|8.42
|8.42
|8.45
| 8.45
|
|
|-
|-
|[[Zaclaria]]
| [[Zaclaria]]
|
|
|
|
Line 996: Line 1,019:
|
|
|
|
|2.66
|2.66  
|
|
|
|
Line 1,002: Line 1,025:
==History==
==History==
==Controversies==
==Controversies==
The Liberty Index has a long history of dispute, mainly by nations with lower scores or non-Ocidental or Coscivian culture nations. Criticisms of the Liberty Index often center of accusing the ILIF of being biased towards Latin and Romance nations, unfairly boosting the scores of constitutional monarchies where the monarch retains real powers of government, and occasionally going as far as suggesting the Liberty Index is biased towards donor nations. Counterclaims often point to the inclusion of [[Carna]] in the upper echelons of scoring listings, as well as the fact that non-Latins can suck it.
The Liberty Index and other scoring metrics used by the ILIF have often been criticized as unduly favoring Occidental and Coscivian cultures over Alshari, Cronan, and Audonian nations, as well as opposing arguments from liberal nations decrying the institution of supposedly artificially inflating the scores of constitutional monarchies. In some cases, these arguments go so far as to suggest that the ILIF is little but a propaganda front for League donor nations.
 
In 2002, [[Varshan]] attempted unsuccessfully to sue the ILIF into in League courts on a number of accusations amounting to vexatious litigation. Several of these cases remained in limbo until Varshan's expulsion from the League of Nations.
[[Category:Bureau of International Statistics]]
[[Category:Bureau of International Statistics]]
[[Category:League of Nations]]
[[Category:League of Nations]]
Kistan
3,909

edits

Retrieved from "https://ixwiki.com/wiki/Special:MobileDiff/40250"