3,903
edits
m (modified infobox most of the way) Tag: 2017 source edit |
mNo edit summary Tag: 2017 source edit |
||
Line 28: | Line 28: | ||
| march = | | march = | ||
| mascot = | | mascot = | ||
| equipment = 1 [[Russian aircraft carrier Admiral Kuznetsov|aircraft carrier]] | | equipment = | ||
1 [[Russian aircraft carrier Admiral Kuznetsov|aircraft carrier]] | |||
<br>2 [[Kirov-class battlecruiser|battlecruiser]]s | <br>2 [[Kirov-class battlecruiser|battlecruiser]]s | ||
<br>3 [[cruiser]]s | <br>3 [[cruiser]]s | ||
Line 78: | Line 79: | ||
<br />Going into the second quarter of the century, the composition of the Army naval service is changing as older, larger warships become slightly less prominent compared to a larger force of smaller surface combatants. While the light support carrier doctrine employed by the Army remains a key point in Fhainnin strategy within the ______ Sea and in its littoral waters along the open ocean, budget cuts and the lack of a serious neighboring rival make lobbying for a larger navy a weak political position. Currently, the Army plans to phase out much of its older surface fleet in favor of modern designs. While the total number of heavy surface combatants will drop, a larger array of small vessels is planned. Forays into missile boats in particular are in vogue for white-water operations, though the overall trend in modern naval design is a greater integration of air assets with naval ones, as evidenced by the fact that the vast majority of new designs take landing pads into account compared to older Fhainic designs, many of which lagged behind in this area. | <br />Going into the second quarter of the century, the composition of the Army naval service is changing as older, larger warships become slightly less prominent compared to a larger force of smaller surface combatants. While the light support carrier doctrine employed by the Army remains a key point in Fhainnin strategy within the ______ Sea and in its littoral waters along the open ocean, budget cuts and the lack of a serious neighboring rival make lobbying for a larger navy a weak political position. Currently, the Army plans to phase out much of its older surface fleet in favor of modern designs. While the total number of heavy surface combatants will drop, a larger array of small vessels is planned. Forays into missile boats in particular are in vogue for white-water operations, though the overall trend in modern naval design is a greater integration of air assets with naval ones, as evidenced by the fact that the vast majority of new designs take landing pads into account compared to older Fhainic designs, many of which lagged behind in this area. | ||
=== | ===Fleets=== | ||
Vandarch 1st Squadron | |||
Vandarch 2nd Squadron | |||
Vandarch 3rd Squadron | |||
Vandarch 4th Squadron | |||
High Seas Squadron | |||
Northern Squadron | |||
Eilada Squadron | |||
Maloka Squadron | |||
Misc. Task Forces | |||
Attached Forces | |||
Vandarch Naval Aviation Brigade | |||
2. Foot Marines Brigade | |||
3. Mechanized Marines Brigade | |||
3. Foot Marines Brigade | |||
====Ship Class/Role Designations==== | ====Ship Class/Role Designations==== |
edits