6,783
edits
User:Kir/Draftspace11: Difference between revisions
m
→GKIP
m (→LFK) |
m (→GKIP) |
||
| Line 442: | Line 442: | ||
|} | |} | ||
The '''Great Kirav Independence Party''' ([[Kiravic]]: ''Plaiduv Viutikordh Ambrikiravsk'') is a minor Kiravian political party that advocates the secession of [[Great Kirav]] and its constituent provinces from the [[Kiravian Federacy]] and [[Kiravian Collectivity|Collectivity]]. Great Kirav is the {{wp|metropole}} of these entities, however, GKIP maintains that the post-reunification constitutional and political framework disadvantages the mainland provinces for the benefit of the overseas provinces, and threatens to make Great Kirav effectively "a colony of its colonies". The Party is supportive of downsizing the Kiravian overseas network by | The '''Great Kirav Independence Party''' ([[Kiravic]]: ''Plaiduv Viutikordh Ambrikiravsk'') is a minor Kiravian political party that advocates the secession of [[Great Kirav]] and its constituent provinces from the [[Kiravian Federacy]] and [[Kiravian Collectivity|Collectivity]]. Great Kirav is the {{wp|metropole}} of these entities, however, GKIP maintains that the post-reunification constitutional and political framework disadvantages the mainland provinces for the benefit of the overseas provinces, and threatens to make Great Kirav effectively "a colony of its colonies". The Party is supportive of downsizing the Kiravian overseas network by gradually relinquishing KF control of such possessions, but ultimately believes that removing Great Kirav itself from the Federacy is a more feasible strategy given the structure of the KF constitution and foreseeable political conditions. | ||
The central doctrine of the GKIP platform is: | |||
*The 1987 constitution and federal policy under all subsequent administrations have been principally directed toward maintaining and expanding an empire. | |||
*Whereas under a classical colonial empire value is extracted from the colonies to enrich the metropole, under the Kiravian neo-empire the resources of the putative metropole are used to support the colonies and perpetuate the neo-imperial project as an end in itself. *This state of affairs was engineered by a concert of narrow élite interests - the {{wp|military-industrial complex}}, [[Renaissance Party]] nomenklatura, certain business entities, and the bureaucratic corps - who seek to preserve and expand it for their own benefit. | |||
*This arrangement is actively detrimental to the economic development of Great Kirav (especially its inland provinces) and subverts the equal dignity and democratic rights of Mainlanders. | |||
The left-right spectrum does not enjoy wide currency in Kiravia, but Occidental observers of Kiravian politics generally categorise GKIP as a centre-left party for historical reasons: The party grew out of the movement against Kiravian reunification, the base of which was homogeneously left-wing in opposition to the majority right-wing [[National Reunification Front]] coming to power on the Mainland. The founders of GKIP all had some level of background in the Kirosocialist movement, though the party itself is not Kiravian Union restorationist. The party does not subscribe to any particular fiscal-economic ideology, and notes that it includes both {{wp|economic liberalism|liberals}} and {{wp|protectionism|protectionists}} in its organisation. | The left-right spectrum does not enjoy wide currency in Kiravia, but Occidental observers of Kiravian politics generally categorise GKIP as a centre-left party for historical reasons: The party grew out of the movement against Kiravian reunification, the base of which was homogeneously left-wing in opposition to the majority right-wing [[National Reunification Front]] coming to power on the Mainland. The founders of GKIP all had some level of background in the Kirosocialist movement, though the party itself is not Kiravian Union restorationist. The party does not subscribe to any particular fiscal-economic ideology, and notes that it includes both {{wp|economic liberalism|liberals}} and {{wp|protectionism|protectionists}} in its organisation. | ||