League of Nations: Difference between revisions

Some renowned international figures have criticized the League of Nations as an extension of [[Urcean]] diplomacy, or more broadly as an exclusive [[Occidental]] and colonial powers club in spite of the long-term membership and even political tenured of delegates from eastern nations such as Corumm in the offices of the League. The League of Nations is a common target of [[Counter-Equatorial Movement|Counter-Equatorial conspiracy theories]] and manifestos by dictators and warlords in the third world, as well as nations diplomatically bent against Caphirian-Urcean hegemony. Additionally, the League has found a number of critics claiming it is too powerful and interferes in national affairs even as others decry it as useless and unconcerned with actual change or improvement in the world.