Slavery in Great Levantia: Difference between revisions
→Trade, economy, and sales: Gothic map when? |
|||
Line 57: | Line 57: | ||
==Demography== | ==Demography== | ||
==Legacy== | |||
[[Great Levantia|Great Levantine]] slave practices, in both where they took slaves from and where they sold or settled them, had massive, permanent, demographic impacts on [[Levantia]]. A prominent example can be found in [[The Valley (Urcea)|Urcea's Valley region]], which had almost entirely driven out or assimilated its indigineous [[Gaelic people]] into [[Latinic people|Latinic culture]] by around 150 BC with the exception of remote mountain and forested regions far from the Valley's main urban area around the [[Urce River]]. The massive arrival of slaves from the [[Gallian War]] reestablished Gaelic cultural traditions and mores in the urban areas of the Valley, setting up later cultural integration. Many historians have suggested Levantine slavery was a primary driver behind the establishment of the [[Urcean people]], and deportations from [[Tromarine]] almost certainly was the significant event which preceded the establishment of the [[Garán people]] of [[Carolina]]. | |||
[[Category: Levantia]] | [[Category: Levantia]] | ||
[[Category: IXWB]] | [[Category: IXWB]] |
Revision as of 15:09, 15 April 2022
This article is a work-in-progress because it is incomplete and pending further input from an author. Note: The contents of this article are not considered canonical and may be inaccurate. Please comment on this article's talk page to share your input, comments and questions. |
Slavery in Great Levantia was an important social and economic institution which existed throughout much of Great Levantia's existence. Slaves served a wide variety of purposes in ancient Levantine society, with a majority involved in hard labor related to the extraction of natural resources, though a considerable majority served in the role of household slave and other urban purposes. Socially, slavery served as a means of control and also as a geopolitical tool to reduce disloyal Gaelic peoples in the Levantine hinterland and also as a means to repopulate strategically important regions. In ancient Levantine society, citizens could not be enslaved for any reason nor could an individual who served in the Levantine legions. Slaves were considered property and had no legal protections. Until 50 AD, no legal mechanism allowed for the freeing of slaves, though slaves would increasingly gain legal protections.
The original source for slaves in earliest ancient Levantia were non-citizen convicted criminals and those in debt who would be sentences to various terms of enslavement to an individual or the state as part of a sentence. In time, as Great Levantia expanded, the institution changed from a primarily penal institution to a broader one, including debtors, criminals, and those captured in war, particularly Gaelic people. In time, as Great Levantia reached its peak and prosecuted the Gallian Wars, the vast majority of slaves were people captured in war. The Gallian Wars in particular lead to a historic influx of slaves, transforming the institution into a means of control of indigenous peoples while also transforming the economy to being increasingly reliant on slave labor.
Origins and history
Most early Levantine slaves were individuals sentenced to limited terms of enslavement as a result of a crime or more commonly due to debt arrears. The earliest instituion of slavery in Great Levantia and its predecessor cities somewhat resembled Slavery in Caphiria and was viewed mostly as a penal institution rather than a core social and economic one. Captured foreigners were always part of slavery in the greater Adonerii civilization, with many of the earliest Latinic settlements in Levantia having Gaelic slaves in the historical record. Regardless, until the third century BC, convicts and debtors made up the majority of the slave labor force. Although Great Levantia underwent campaigns of conquest throughout much of modern Urcea and Dericania, enforced enslavement was unevenly applied, and in many cases the Republic-era leaders largely focused on attempting to integrate local conquered people into Levantine society by means other than slavery. Gaelic slaves brought back to the Levantine heartland, if serving as household or agricultural slaves, were subject to a basic form of education. While slaves were looked down upon, they did not have the severe social stigma later associated with slaves, as the fact that many were convicted individuals meant that it could be reasonably anticipated they would be productive members of society at some future point. Captured foreign slaves retained temporary terms of enslavement until around 250 BC, when life terms for foreigners became a legal option. By 150 BC, it became functionally the only term of enslavement allowed to a foreign capture.
The Gallian Wars are considered by most historians to be a significant turning point in the history of Great Levantine slavery. While foreign captured slaves had become a growing contingent of those in bondage in Great Levantia, the wars imported untold numbers of Gaels into bondage. Historical estimates range from as low as tens of thousands to a high of about a million, instantly transforming the Levantine economy as large amounts of cheap labor were suddenly available. The influx of slaves hastened urbanization in Levantia. Due to both changing attitudes and the sheer number of slaves, cultural integration of slaves was no longer viewed as a priority, and consequently slaves began to develop a rapidly divergent culture from their Latinic overlords, blending many Gaelic traditions from different regions and tribes. Post-Gallian Wars slavery also changed the perception of slaves, and they were largely shunned by society and viewed as untouchables. Post-wars domestic slaves retained a degree of the respect that slaves had held in earlier periods but were still largely unable to engage with citizens in any meaningful way.
In what would become Fiannria as well as areas of Carna, Anglei, and Hollona and Diorisia, slavery was used as a method of control. Rebellious frontier populations of Gaels would often be deported en masse in a disproportionate response to unrest or small rebellions and replaced with settlers from the Great Levantine core region, often Latinics or Latinied Gaels. The use of deportation in this manner, both in actual incidents as well as in the threat of deportation and enslavement, has been characterized by some historians as an early form of deliberate genocide. These efforts left significant demographic implications in these areas, not only transplanting new groups of people but also leaving them significant depopulated and open to future Gothic settlement that would come with Gothic raids and invasion in the fourth century.
Although Great Levantine conquests began to slow and come to a halt in the first century AD and immediate aftermath of the Gallian Wars, foreign slaves continued to be readily available in the first century. Great Levantine armies establishing client kingdoms and other subordinate relationships with Goths as well as what would become Caergwynn and Faneria captured thousands of slaves, sometimes in a single campaign, for sale back home. Additionally, local client kings and other polities would sell groups of captured enemies to the Levantines; the Ninerivers Confederation and Vandar Empire would conquer and deport Gothic people living in northern Levantia to Great Levantia. While private slave trading was illegal, it was often difficult to enforce. Parties of raiders would often use the Vandarch as a method of raiding and capturing people from Gothica for sale in modern Fiannria as well as Hollona and Diorisia.
A major slave revolt in Tromarine in 150 AD lead to a mixed response by Levantine authorities. On the one hand, new laws were introduced against runaway slaves and a period of generally harsher enforcement was inaugurated against unruly and potentially rebellious slaves. On the other hand, new pathways to manumission and a maximum term of enslavement were both introduced in the 150s, although the latter was undermined inasmuch as an individual slave could face multiple consecutive terms of enslavement. Most historians believe more slaves were freed or gained their own freedom between 150 and 200 AD than at any other previous time in Levantine history. It was also made illegal for debtors to be sold into slavery in 178 AD, changing slavery to an almost exclusively foreign or foreign-descendant institution.
Transition to serfdom
As the prospect of foreign conquests came to a definitive end by the latter half of the 3rd century and as slaves gained increasing legal protection and possibility of manumission, slaves became harder to procure and more expensive to acquire. Accordingly, many of the large landowners of Great Levantia began the transition from slavery to free Levantine citizens from cities, particularly with respect to agricultural activities. This process precipitated a period of several centuries where cities would become largely depopulated, also reducing the need for large staffs of household slaves in urban homes of the elite. The slow transition to serfdom which began around this period not only lead to major economic changes but lead to a concentration of existing slaves to be sent to mines. Following centuries of improvement with respect to their legal position, the material conditions of slaves suddenly plummeted and life expectancies grew significantly shorter.
The introduction of Christianity as both a legal and eventually official institution was another blow to slavery. Not only did Christian morality require humane treatment of slaves and a general suspicion of the institution, but it also lead to the rapid decline of ancient Levantine religion. As many temples began to close or be forcefully converted into Churches, the primarily slave-based industry of temple prostitution waned considerably in the 4th century.
Functional end of slavery
Multiple factors lead to the functional end of slavery in Levantia. Primarily, the slow collapse of Great Levantia lead to severe reductions in trade and advanced economic activity, making large-scale state sponsored mines no longer viable to operate. Slaves were also increasingly hard to find and the institution of slavery largely lost its raison d'etre as slave labor became nearly as expensive as labor among freemen and urban citizens. The number of slaves further declined with the collapse of centralized state authority and law and order, as incidents of runaway slaves never being recovered became ubiquitous in the fifth century historical record. Catholic morality, which was becoming the primary social mores of Levantine society by the fifth century, increasingly looked down upon the institution as theologians and practitioners alike questioned fellow children of God being held in bondage. The Levantine urban collapse also lead to the end of the institution of household slaves during the fifth century, as most major urban palaces were abandoned or turned into fortified manors with an emphasis on food self-sufficiency, and many remaining household slaves were transitioned into freemen tenants on these estates. With social attitudes turning against it, slaves becoming rare commodities, and the end of field, mine, and domestic slaves as well as temple prostitutes, the institution faded into obscurity with the end of Great Levantia in the beginning of the sixth century. Some forms of slavery continued to exist under powerful or wealthy local rulers who could subjugate neighboring villages in the post-Levantine era, but by the turn of the seventh century slaves were vanishingly rare in Levantia. The rare exception were galley slaves, which continued in relatively robust form for centuries to come. New laws implemented by both late Great Levantia and the Catholic Church, however, limited the term of service of galley slaves, and most galley slaves - either captured or sentenced to the status due to indebtedness - could expect to spend a majority of their lives as free persons. Serfdom would become the more common form of forced labor in Urcea and the rest of Levantia, but had strict legal protections and generally could not be bought and sold apart from the land on which they lived and worked.
Most former slaves and their descendants would go on to become freemen within the system of social class in Urcea, ironically being considered above the class of serfs who primarily descended from urban Levantine citizens.
Formal abolition of slavery
Apart from the use of galley slaves, slavery was exceedingly rare in Levantia following the seventh century, with some estimates projecting less than 4,000 slaves of all types in bondage by the year 800 AD. The early Levantine Empire, established in the mid 8th century, discouraged the use of slaves. Slavery of Christians was formally banned in the Empire in 903 AD. Slavery against non-Christian groups - such as Gothic people - was subsequently discouraged and the legal terms of enslavement significantly limited. Galley slavery was limited to three year terms in 1045. Besides galley slaves, historians believe that there were no slaves within the Empire by 1100.
Trade, economy, and sales
Terms of enslavement
Sales and auctions
Slave roles
Household slave
Field slave
Mine slave
Mine slavery involved slaves, mostly on Tromarine but across Great Levantia, brought in specifically for the purpose of mining some type of resource. Only slaves with life terms of enslavement could be used in the mines. The most brutal form of slavery involving long hours of toil, extreme repression, and significant physical danger, life expectancy for mine slavery was far, far below every other kind of slavery. Slaves sent to the mines often were anticipated to be fit for work for about eleven months, after which time it was anticipated they would have died or be so physically debilitated that they were no longer fit for labor of any kind. Accordingly, unlike most other types of slaves, mine slaves often were not able to reproduce to the point of creating a unique slave culture or even replenish the labor force, and the vast majority of mine slaves were imported for use rather than having been born into it. Mine slavery was most common in Tromarine, which had the highest per capita percentage of slaves of any location in Great Levantia. Mines in Tromarine were responsible for a large quantity of tin used in Sarpedon and Levantia, making conditions especially brutal, leading to a large revolt of mine slaves in 150 AD. Following the revolt, mine slavery entered a minor decline but continued until complex economic activity and trade were no longer possible with the impending collapse of Great Levantia. Most state-operated mines ceased function around 450 AD, with mine slavery abruptly coming to an end after that date with limited examples of small, private run slave-operating mines continuing on for several decades.
Temple slave
Galley slave
Galley slaves were the most common form of slaves in what would become the Creagmer mercantile cities as well as on Crotona; they were the second most common type of slave in Tromarine behind mine slaves.
Cartographic slave
The rarest form of slave were the so-called "cartographic slaves". These slaves were often skilled hunters, trackers, or scouts from both Gaelic and Gothic tribes living on the borders of Great Levantia. These individuals, kept apart from general slaves, were subject to live enslavement but otherwise allowed relatively modest living comforts. Their responsibility was creating usable campaign maps, charts, and compiled list of other useful geographic information for use by Great Levantia's legions, allowing them to traverse in lands outside the realm. While the information collected by these slaves was often extremely detailed and useful, many slaves intentionally included minor errors in the maps in order to leave Levantine forces at a disadvantage. Cartographic slaves, despite their relatively high standing, were subject to the harshest penalties and punishments if found to be altering their maps or otherwise withholding information. Cartographic slaves who mislead Levantine forces were often publicly disembowled while living in the Levantine Forum. The practice was discontinued following a number of major military setbacks in Gothica in the late third centuries, although historians are unclear if cartographic information was responsible or if cartographic slavery was used as an excuse to cover for military leadership.
Demography
Legacy
Great Levantine slave practices, in both where they took slaves from and where they sold or settled them, had massive, permanent, demographic impacts on Levantia. A prominent example can be found in Urcea's Valley region, which had almost entirely driven out or assimilated its indigineous Gaelic people into Latinic culture by around 150 BC with the exception of remote mountain and forested regions far from the Valley's main urban area around the Urce River. The massive arrival of slaves from the Gallian War reestablished Gaelic cultural traditions and mores in the urban areas of the Valley, setting up later cultural integration. Many historians have suggested Levantine slavery was a primary driver behind the establishment of the Urcean people, and deportations from Tromarine almost certainly was the significant event which preceded the establishment of the Garán people of Carolina.