User:Kir/Draftspace11

URP

Umcaran Renaissance Party Plêduv Ùmkarag Inowamsuk
Flag
States	Umcara State, South Æonara, East Æonara, West Æonara
Headquarters	Rambosar, South Æonara
Chairperson	X.N. Vúhoń
Leader	Bob Jones
Platform	Umcaran Coscivian interests Shaftonist republicanism Coscivian nationalism Conservatism
Voter Base	Umcaran Coscivians
Conferences	Interstate Republican Conference
Federal Caucus	SRA
Electoral Symbol
South Æonara	32 / 120
Liberantia	35 / 65
Federal Stanora	4 / 545

EJP

Economic Justice Party Plaiduv Timoniúlitærēsk
Logo
Headquarters	№21, 18-ram, E-District, Kartika
Party Chair	Saverius Kaîśaxon
Whip	Ordovicius Sūrmiran
Platform	Georgism Geoconservatism Social credit Distributism Monetarism Social conservatism Agrarianism
Voter Base	Farm Gang
Conferences	Progressive Alliance
Caucus	Kiravian Free Alliance
Federal Stanora	4 / 545

GKIP

Great Kirav Independence Party Plaiduv Viutikordh Ambrikiravsk
Flag
States	Serikorda
Headquarters	Kirav City, Kannur
Chairman	G.K. Indepencerton
Whip	Some Guy
Platform	Great Kirav independence Insularism Territorial nationalism Cisatrassicism
Voter Base	Small
Conference	Labour Front of Kirav (observer)
Federal Stanora	212 / 545

The Great Kirav Independence Party (Kiravic: Plaiduv Viutikordh Ambrikiravsk) is a minor Kiravian political party that advocates for Great Kirav and its constituent provinces to secede from the Kiravian Federacy and Collectivity and become an independent federal republic. Great Kirav is the metropole of the two entities in question; however, GKIP maintains that the post-reunification constitutional and political framework disadvantages the mainland provinces for the benefit of the overseas provinces, and threatens to make Great Kirav effectively "a colony of its colonies". The Party is supportive of downsizing the Kiravian overseas network by gradually relinquishing KF control of such possessions, but ultimately believes that removing Great Kirav itself from the Federacy is a more feasible strategy given the structure of the KF constitution and foreseeable political conditions.

Platform

The central doctrine of the GKIP platform is:

• The 1987 constitution and federal policy under all subsequent administrations have been principally directed toward maintaining and expanding an empire.
• Whereas under a classical colonial empire value is extracted from the colonies to enrich the metropole, under the Kiravian neo-empire the resources of the putative metropole are used to support the colonies and perpetuate the neo-imperial project as an end in itself.
• This state of affairs was engineered by a concert of narrow élite interests - the military-industrial complex, Renaissance Party nomenklatura, certain business entities, and the bureaucratic corps - who seek to preserve and expand it for their own benefit.
• This arrangement is actively detrimental to the economic development of Great Kirav (especially its inland provinces) and subverts the equal dignity and democratic rights of Mainlanders.

GKIP claims that the financial burden of the defence spending and other government expenditure required for the upkeep of the overseas provinces is excessive and not justifiable by any modern, democratic standard of the public interest, and also that this burden is borne mostly by the mainland. It also claims that the diversion of tax revenues and government spending toward sustaining the empire retards the development of the lower-income mainland provinces.

The left-right spectrum does not enjoy wide currency in Kiravia, but Occidental observers of Kiravian politics generally categorise GKIP as a centre-left party for historical reasons: The party grew out of the movement against Kiravian reunification, the base of which was homogeneously left-wing in opposition to the majority right-wing National Reunification Front coming to power on the Mainland. The founders of GKIP all had some level of background in the Kirosocialist movement, though the party itself is not socialist or aiming to restore the Kiravian Union. The party does not subscribe to any particular fiscal-economic ideology, and notes that it includes both liberals and protectionists in its organisation.

Exit Strategy

As of its 2007 manifesto, GKIP's vision for Great Kirav's separation from the Kiravian Federacy follows a model dubbed "Paulastrafication" (Pávlastrasoiktor), referencing the peaceful and amicable manner in which Paulastra became independent from Kiravian colonial rule. Whereas Paulastra erected its own monarchy while recognising the symbolic authority of the Marble Emperor, the GKIP envisions a Republic of Kirav as a federative crowned republic with the Emperor as its direct head-of-state.

GKIP's preferred process for independence is for each province in Great Kirav to receive "self-rule under the Emperor" in their own right, and then for these provinces to accede to the Republic of Kirav.

According to Simon Ruhnama, "What the Federacy does after Great Kirav leaves is its own business", and that the Republic of Kirav should maintain "good relations but no obligations" toward a rump Federacy and/or any other post-Federacy independent states. The party rejects proposals for a looser federal/confederal structure, a supranational or intergovernmental successor to the Federacy, or relationships of free association between the Republic of Kirav and former colonies, saying that such structures would only "incubate the reëmergence of empire". Some individual party members have expressed hostility toward a "Second Remnant" and stated that they would prefer that former Kiravian colonies be annexed to or vassalised by friendly foreign powers if unable to survive independently.

GKIP says it would "come to a transitional arrangement" with a rump Federacy allowing it to retain the District of Ksoīnvra for up to five years while it finds a new seat of government, provided that the Federacy cover the District's utility bills. It would expect that the Interlake Canal District be gifted to the Republic of Kirav upon independence, however.

Activities

GKIP actively campaigns for the ejection of Sydona from the Kiravian Collectivity. In the words of former spokesman Werner Wienerson, "Sydona proves our entire case. The fact that families in Elegia have to pay to subsidise the basket-case economy of a country on the ass-end of the world full of Slavs and Phrygians just because some Kiravian crusaders retired there 800 years ago tells you everything about who's really in charge."

During the 2034 Canespa Crisis, party chief Ahmet Longoślonguv appeared on the AM radio show I Got Court to highlight the inefficiency of the pluricontinental federacy, asking "Say that there were a full ground invasion of Porfíria tomorrow. Forget Great Kirav - how are the Porfírians better off relying on our scattered, overextended military assets for their defence? Wouldn't they be safer joining the NSTA?"

Green Party of Kirav

Green Party of Kirav Glasiplaiduv Kiravsk
Logo
Headquarters	Kernovek, Serikorda
Chairman	Cládiuv Luatorkár
Whip	Kirmuid Ranapaćukuv
Platform	Green liberalism Liberal democracy Progressivism Populism
Voter Base	Environmentalists Mainland youth Liberals Bahá'ís
Caucus	Third Front
Federal Stanora	55 / 545

The Green Party of Kirav (Kiravic: Glasiplaiduv Kiravsk) was a liberal-democratic and environmentalist political party in the Kiravian Federacy between Reunification and passage of the Anti-Party Law. The Greens came to lead a Third Front between the National Renewal Movement and the People's Alliance, and exerted influence on federal policy during this formative stage of post-unification Kiravian politics. Support for the Greens suddenly imploded in [YEAR] following the controversial indictment of their leader, Cládiuv Luatorkár, on bestiality charges. Consequent power-struggle within the party apparatus and the regulatory burdens imposed by the Anti-Party Law led the party to splinter into several rival factions, none of which would approach the original party's level of success. Nonetheless, the legacy of the Greens and the Green-led Third Front lives on in some currents of the Kiravian Free Alliance and Union of Democrats and Independents.

Background

The reunified Kiravian Federacy in 1985 AD inherited significant environmental challenges incurred by the policies of its predecessor governments. A half-century of rapid and intensive industrialisation on both sides of the Sunderance had resulted in serious pollution problems and ecological degradation in the Overseas as well as Great Kirav. That said, the environmental situation on the Mainland in 1985 was unquestionably worse. Environmental degradation and the extractive policies of the Kiravian Union had devastated rural communities.

Historians of the period contend that discontent over environmental issues was a contributing factor to the widespread popular unrest that preceded the collapse of the Union.

Run

The Greens located their base of support among those Mainland voters, particularly youth, who welcomed the end of Kirosocialism and the opportunity for change, but were wary of the nation's "new management" in the form of the previously Æonara-based political class organised as the National Renewal Movement. Virtually all Kiravians outside the Kirosocialist camp rejoiced at reunification in principle; nonetheless, a significant share of Mainlanders still adhered (perhaps not without merit) to the image that Kiravian Union propaganda had painted of the "Æonara authorities": a coalition of right-wing military honchos and shadowy technocrats with a retinue of atavistic reactionaries and avaricious plutocrats in tow.

Green messaging in the early years of democracy was built around the theme of a "fresh start" (Miśnalōm) that contrasted with triumphalist NRM campaigns claiming credit for "restoring" the constitutional order and Kiravian liberties and People's Alliance campaigns focused on the imperative to protect social progress made under the Kiravian Union. To Kiravians uncomfortable with the dominant narrative of the Remnant defeating the Union and imposing its victorious ideology on Great Kirav, the Greens proclaimed that both regimes had run their course and that reunification was a moment of opportunity to leave Sunderance politics behind and build new, all-inclusive institutions to meet the challenges of a new era.

Platform

Unlike most green parties internationally, the Kiravian Greens were affirmatively capitalist and broadly liberal on economic matters.

• Abolition of conscription and general dimilitarisation
• Strengthening the legal régime of the Emperor's ownership of the commons
• Ideally, a new constitutional convention, or otherwise constitutional amendments toward the following ends:
  • Equalisation of the provinces and the expansion of statehood, toward a symmetric federation
  • Levelling of citizenship
  • Electoral reform: Proportional representation in the Stanora and a sane normal system for electing the PE.
  • Open nominations for the Prime Executure
  • Executive term limits
  • Lowering the voting age to 18
• Abolition of the internal passport system
• Ban on tetraethyllead

Collapse

The party collapsed after its leader, Cládiuv Luatorkár, was indicted and ultimately convicted on charges of bestiality involving cattle and camelids. Luatorkár maintained his innocence. After his release from prison, Luatorkár found life in Kiravia to be unbearable and moved to Cartadania, where he changed his name to Claudio Espeto and died in obscurity in 2017 AD.

Surviving provincial chapters and splinter groups descended from the Green Party include:

• Civilian Ecological Party - A minor party mainly active on demilitarisation, civil liberties, and transparency issues
• Democratic Farmers' Party of Intravia
• Banana Slug Party of Ilfenóra
• Green Party of Exónia Autonomous Countyship - One of two major parties in the locality, alongside the Anti-Masonic Party

Third Front

Third Front Kírover
Logo
Headquarters	Kartika, District of Ksoīnvra
Chairman	Matéuv Dénalin
Whip	Siné Qu'Anon
Platform	Liberal democracy Environmentalism Populism factions: Agrarianism Social liberalism Progressivism Georgism Social credit Green conservatism
Voter Base	Upper Kirav, Indebted farmers, Bahá'ís, Libs
Caucus	Third Front
Federal Stanora	75 / 545

Political Dynamics of the Stanora

The political dynamics of the Stanora are shaped by X main factors:

• Coalitional presidentialism -

• Party Incohesion - A relatively weak balance of centripetal forces (e.g. party structures and financing, procedural power) against centrifugal forces (committee power, diverging interests of state parties, STV) and legal limits on the institutional power of political groups make for a rather low level of caucus and coalition cohesion relative to most other national legislatures.

MSRP

National Constructive Organisation Xinórabávitoriskorvin
File:DATCO..jpg Flag
States	Nera, Kastera, Hiterna, Etivera, Váuadra, Devalōmara, Entarova, Kannur, Vitrova, Sixuan, Iunnan, Korlēdan, Kiygrava
Headquarters	Irastuv, Nera
Chairman	K.A. Serānian
Whip	V.M. Tāgen-Iribisuv
Platform	State capitalism Productivism Developmentalism Technocracy Industrialism Transatrassicism tendencies: Liberal conservatism Neo-mercantilism Kir nationalism
Voter Base	White-collar workers Kir people
Conference	none
Federal Stanora	55 / 545

Overt agenda: Professional, pragmatist centre-right to right-wing politics. Pro-growth, pro-corporate policies. Supportive of the social order but quiet on any cultural issues.

Covert agenda: Libertarian police state/corporate police state.

Post-Kirsoc non-ideological "party of power" in its states.