Federalist Republican Alliance: Difference between revisions

In a Kiravian context, the SRA as a whole is seen as moderate on social and cultural issues, though many individual member parties position themselves as strong {{wp|cultural libertarianism|cultural libertarians}} or strong {{wp|social conservatism|social conservatives}}. The caucus is overall less inclined towards legislating morality than the Caritist Social Union, and less inclined towards legislating culture than the Coscivian National Congress. Nonetheless, it is socially conservative by Western standards, and rejects the very concept of {{wp|Social progress|social progess}} on Shaftonist philosophical grounds. Because most aspects of {{wp|social policy}} and {{wp|cultural policy}} are the purview of state governments rather than the federal government, the caucus itself has few official positions on social issues. As there is a strong trans-partisan conservative consensus in Kiravia on issues such as reproductive bioethics, sexual orientation, and gender identity that are more contentious in Western countries, the SRA platform does not expressly address these issues.  

The SRA has consistently supported ''dhiambrikorisēn'' or "nondistinctionism", the idea that the various Coscivian ethnosocial groups (''tuvî'') and analogous minority communities should not have any corporate recognition before the law, and that the government should not identify or classify persons according to their ethnosocial group.

The SRA has consistently supported measures to maintain the use of [[Kiravic Coscivian]] as the nationwide language of inter-ethnic communication and the ''de facto'' national language, though it was instrumental in ending Kirosocialist suppression of regional and ethnic Coscivian vernacular languages.