Liberty Index: Difference between revisions
mNo edit summary |
reduced to composite scoring index, refreshed list of nations, added minor additional data |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Liberty | The '''International Liberty Index Foundation''' is a [[League of Nations]]-sanctioned NGO whose goal is the cataloguing of the nations of the world by their traits in relation to democratic norms and liberal values. Founded in 1958 in Cartadania in conjunction with the Organization for Democracy International, the ILIF manages a League-sanctioned set of indexes: the the Democracy Index, the Civil Rights Index, and the Perceived Corruption Index. Each is calculated relative to the global community yearly, with one nation scoring a 10 and setting the benchmark for the year. In addition, the ILIF manages a Global Liberty Index marking fluctuations in the quality of Index Benchmark Nations as well as a Composite Index. | ||
Aggregate scores from each decade since 1960 and every five years since 2010 are shown below, and scores as well as individual indexes can be viewed in full on the International Liberty Index Foundation's [[website]]. | |||
{| class="wikitable sortable mw-collapsible mw-collapsed" | {| class="wikitable sortable mw-collapsible mw-collapsed" | ||
|+ | |+Composite Liberty Index Scores by Country (Quinquennial) | ||
!Nation | !Nation | ||
!1960 | !1960 | ||
Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
!1990 | !1990 | ||
!2000 | !2000 | ||
!2010 | !2010 | ||
!2015 | !2015 | ||
Line 17: | Line 16: | ||
!Notes | !Notes | ||
|- | |- | ||
| | |[[Aciria]] | ||
| | | | ||
| | | | ||
Line 30: | Line 28: | ||
| | | | ||
|- | |- | ||
|[[ | |[[Algosh Republic|Algoquona]] | ||
| | | - | ||
| | | - | ||
| | | - | ||
| | | - | ||
| | | - | ||
| | |2.35 | ||
| | |2.34 | ||
| | |2.34 | ||
| | |4.88 | ||
| | |Algoquona was subject to regime change in 2025 as part of the [[Final War of the Deluge]]. | ||
|- | |- | ||
| | |[[Allaria]] | ||
| | | | ||
| | | | ||
| | | | ||
| | | | ||
| | | | ||
| | | | ||
| | | | ||
| | | | ||
| | | | ||
| | | | ||
|- | |||
|[[Alpachnee Confederation|Alpachnee]] | |||
| | | | ||
| | | | ||
Line 117: | Line 59: | ||
| | | | ||
| | | | ||
| | | | ||
| | | | ||
| | | | ||
| | | | ||
|- | |- | ||
| | |[[Alstin]] | ||
| | |9.33 | ||
| | |9.35 | ||
| | |9.46 | ||
| | |9.50 | ||
| | |9.68 | ||
| | |9.87 | ||
| | |9.86 | ||
| | |9.91 | ||
| | |9.92 | ||
| | | | ||
|- | |- | ||
| | |[[Anglei]] | ||
| | | | ||
| | | | ||
Line 169: | Line 85: | ||
| | | | ||
| | | | ||
| | | | ||
| | | | ||
|- | |- | ||
| | |[[Anta Carda]] | ||
| | | | ||
| | | | ||
Line 182: | Line 96: | ||
| | | | ||
| | | | ||
| | | | ||
| | | | ||
| | | | ||
|- | |- | ||
| | |[[Arcerion]] | ||
| | | | ||
| | | | ||
| | | | ||
Line 221: | Line 109: | ||
| | | | ||
| | | | ||
| | | | ||
| | | | ||
|- | |- | ||
| | |[[Ashkenang]] | ||
| | | | ||
| | | | ||
Line 234: | Line 121: | ||
| | | | ||
| | | | ||
| | | | ||
| | | | ||
|- | |- | ||
| | |[[Battganuur]] | ||
| | | | ||
| | | | ||
Line 246: | Line 132: | ||
| | | | ||
| | | | ||
| | |6.95 | ||
| | | | ||
| | | | ||
|- | |- | ||
| | |[[Bulkh]] | ||
| | | | ||
| | | | ||
Line 260: | Line 145: | ||
| | | | ||
| | | | ||
| | | | ||
| | | | ||
|- | |- | ||
| | |Burgundie | ||
| | |7.81 | ||
|8.19 | |||
| | |8.50 | ||
| | |8.84 | ||
| | |9.12 | ||
| | |9.08 | ||
| | |8.98 | ||
| | |9.17 | ||
| | |9.18 | ||
| | |||
| | | | ||
|- | |- | ||
| | |Caergwynn | ||
| | | | ||
| | | | ||
Line 286: | Line 169: | ||
| | | | ||
| | | | ||
| | | | ||
| | | | ||
|- | |- | ||
| | |Canpei | ||
| | | | ||
| | | | ||
Line 299: | Line 181: | ||
| | | | ||
| | | | ||
| | | | ||
| | | | ||
|- | |- | ||
| | |Caphiria | ||
| | |7.93 | ||
| | |7.95 | ||
| | |8.00 | ||
| | |8.13 | ||
| | |8.02 | ||
| | |8.40 | ||
| | |8.33 | ||
| | |8.44 | ||
| | | | ||
|Scores extremely well in perceived corruption index and mediocre in other categories. | |||
|- | |- | ||
| | |Carna | ||
| | |9.98 | ||
| | |9.99 | ||
| | |9.94 | ||
| | |10.00 | ||
| | |9.86 | ||
| | |10.00 | ||
| | |10.00 | ||
| | |9.98 | ||
| | | | ||
|Consistent top competitor in all categories. | |||
|- | |- | ||
| | |Cartadania | ||
| | |9.85 | ||
| | |9.84 | ||
| | |9.46 | ||
| | |9.97 | ||
| | |10.00 | ||
| | |9.96 | ||
| | |9.98 | ||
| | |10.00 | ||
| | |9.99 | ||
|Consistent top competitor in all categories. | |||
| | |||
|- | |- | ||
| | |Ceylonia | ||
| | | | ||
| | | | ||
Line 363: | Line 228: | ||
| | | | ||
| | | | ||
| | |8.54 | ||
| | | | ||
| | | | ||
|- | |- | ||
| | |Chakailan | ||
| | | | ||
| | | | ||
| | | | ||
| | | | ||
| | | | ||
| | | | ||
| | | | ||
| | | | ||
| | | | ||
| | | | ||
|- | |- | ||
| | |Chenango | ||
| | | | ||
| | | | ||
Line 403: | Line 253: | ||
| | | | ||
| | | | ||
| | | | ||
| | | | ||
|- | |- | ||
| | |Copacaban | ||
| | | | ||
| | | | ||
Line 416: | Line 265: | ||
| | | | ||
| | | | ||
| | | | ||
| | | | ||
|- | |- | ||
| | |Copake | ||
| | | | ||
| | | | ||
Line 429: | Line 277: | ||
| | | | ||
| | | | ||
| | | | ||
| | | | ||
|- | |- | ||
| | |Corcra | ||
| | | | ||
| | | | ||
Line 442: | Line 289: | ||
| | | | ||
| | | | ||
| | | | ||
| | | | ||
|- | |- | ||
| | |Corumm | ||
| | | | ||
| | | | ||
Line 454: | Line 300: | ||
| | | | ||
| | | | ||
| | |3.94 | ||
| | |3.91 | ||
| | | | ||
|- | |- | ||
| | |Duamacia | ||
| | | | ||
| | | | ||
Line 468: | Line 313: | ||
| | | | ||
| | | | ||
| | | | ||
| | | | ||
Line 476: | Line 320: | ||
| | | | ||
|4.12 | |4.12 | ||
| | | | ||
| | | | ||
Line 485: | Line 328: | ||
| | | | ||
|- | |- | ||
| | |Eldmora-Regulus | ||
| | | | ||
| | | | ||
Line 494: | Line 337: | ||
| | | | ||
| | | | ||
| | | | ||
| | | | ||
|- | |- | ||
| | |Etzil | ||
|8.70 | |||
| | |8.73 | ||
| | |8.80 | ||
| | |8.85 | ||
| | |8.84 | ||
| | |8.85 | ||
| | |8.85 | ||
| | |8.87 | ||
| | |||
| | | | ||
| | | | ||
|- | |- | ||
| | |Faneria | ||
| | |4.33 | ||
| | |4.22 | ||
| | |5.67 | ||
| | |6.40 | ||
| | |6.73 | ||
| | |6.94 | ||
| | |6.88 | ||
| | |6.91 | ||
| | |7.03 | ||
|Composite score reduced by effective one-party state status. Score rising due to increasing liberalization. | |||
| | |||
|- | |- | ||
| | |Fiannria | ||
| | | | ||
| | | | ||
Line 533: | Line 373: | ||
| | | | ||
| | | | ||
| | | | ||
| | | | ||
|- | |- | ||
| | |Grajnidar | ||
| | | | ||
| | | | ||
Line 546: | Line 385: | ||
| | | | ||
| | | | ||
| | | | ||
| | | | ||
|- | |- | ||
| | |Hendalarsk | ||
| | | | ||
| | | | ||
| | | | ||
| | | | ||
| | | | ||
| | | | ||
| | | | ||
| | |7.96 | ||
| | | | ||
| | | | ||
|- | |- | ||
| | |Hollonia and Diorisia | ||
| | | | ||
| | | | ||
Line 585: | Line 409: | ||
| | | | ||
| | | | ||
| | | | ||
| | | | ||
|- | |- | ||
Line 608: | Line 418: | ||
| - | | - | ||
|4.33 | |4.33 | ||
|2.04 | |2.04 | ||
|2.10 | |2.10 | ||
|2.16 | |2.16 | ||
| | | | ||
| | |Composite score reduced by arbitrary court system and lack of enfranchisement. | ||
|- | |- | ||
| | |Istrenya | ||
| | | | ||
| | | | ||
Line 624: | Line 433: | ||
| | | | ||
| | | | ||
| | | | ||
| | | | ||
|- | |- | ||
| | |Kandara | ||
| | | | ||
| | | | ||
| | | | ||
Line 650: | Line 446: | ||
| | | | ||
| | | | ||
| | | | ||
|- | |- | ||
| | |Kartejya | ||
| | | | ||
| | | | ||
Line 695: | Line 460: | ||
| | | | ||
|- | |- | ||
| | |Kiravia | ||
| | |? | ||
| | |3.43 | ||
| | |3.92 | ||
| | |3.89 | ||
| | |[[Kirosocialism|3.86]] | ||
| | |6.91 | ||
| | |7.12 | ||
| | |7.09 | ||
| | |7.18 | ||
| | |||
| | | | ||
|- | |- | ||
| | |Kloistan | ||
| | | | ||
| | | | ||
Line 721: | Line 484: | ||
| | | | ||
|- | |- | ||
| | |Kronesia | ||
| | | | ||
| | | | ||
Line 734: | Line 496: | ||
| | | | ||
|- | |- | ||
| | |Loresia | ||
| | | | ||
| | | | ||
Line 747: | Line 508: | ||
| | | | ||
|- | |- | ||
| | |Lutsana | ||
| | | | ||
| | | | ||
Line 760: | Line 520: | ||
| | | | ||
|- | |- | ||
| | |Malentina | ||
| | | | ||
| | | | ||
Line 773: | Line 532: | ||
| | | | ||
|- | |- | ||
| | |Maloka | ||
| | | | ||
| | | | ||
Line 786: | Line 544: | ||
| | | | ||
|- | |- | ||
| | |Metzetta | ||
| | | | ||
| | | | ||
Line 799: | Line 556: | ||
| | | | ||
|- | |- | ||
| | |New Archduchy | ||
| | | | ||
| | | | ||
Line 812: | Line 568: | ||
| | | | ||
|- | |- | ||
| | |New Veltorina | ||
| | | | ||
| | | | ||
Line 825: | Line 580: | ||
| | | | ||
|- | |- | ||
| | |New Yustonia | ||
| | | | ||
| | | | ||
Line 836: | Line 588: | ||
| | | | ||
| | | | ||
|2.68 | |||
|7.88 | |||
| | | | ||
|- | |- | ||
| | |Orclenia | ||
| | | | ||
| | | | ||
Line 851: | Line 604: | ||
| | | | ||
|- | |- | ||
| | |Oyashima | ||
| | | | ||
| | | | ||
Line 863: | Line 612: | ||
| | | | ||
| | | | ||
|6.78 | |||
|3.65 | |||
|In 2022, Oyashima's government suffered a coup related to civil infighting between the Danehong and Mutsutorine ethnicities. | |||
|- | |- | ||
| | |Pankara | ||
| - | |||
| - | |||
| - | |||
| | |||
| | |||
| | |||
| | | | ||
| | | | ||
| | | | ||
| | | | ||
|(1.88) | |||
| - | |||
|Pankara has made efforts to prevent accurate Index reporting since 2019. | |||
|- | |- | ||
| | |Paulaustra | ||
| | | | ||
| | | | ||
Line 890: | Line 640: | ||
| | | | ||
|- | |- | ||
| | |Pelaxia | ||
| | | | ||
| | | | ||
Line 952: | Line 648: | ||
| | | | ||
| | | | ||
|8.53 | |||
| | | | ||
| | | | ||
|- | |- | ||
| | |Peshabiwar | ||
| | | | ||
| | | | ||
Line 1,024: | Line 668: | ||
| | | | ||
| | | | ||
| | |5.88 | ||
| | |5.90 | ||
| | |6.05 | ||
| | |5.78 | ||
| | |6.01 | ||
| | | | ||
| | | | ||
|- | |- | ||
| | |Pukhgundi | ||
| | | | ||
| | | | ||
Line 1,112: | Line 689: | ||
|- | |- | ||
|Pursat | |Pursat | ||
| | | | ||
| | | | ||
Line 1,137: | Line 700: | ||
| | | | ||
|- | |- | ||
| | |Quetzenkel | ||
| | | | ||
| | | | ||
Line 1,177: | Line 713: | ||
|- | |- | ||
|Rusana | |Rusana | ||
| | | | ||
| | | | ||
Line 1,205: | Line 727: | ||
| | | | ||
| | | | ||
| | |2.98 | ||
| | |3.10 | ||
| | |3.21 | ||
| | |3.30 | ||
| | |3.32 | ||
| | |3.31 | ||
| | |4.83 | ||
| | |Beginning in 2024, Sabnaki began a liberalization campaign as part of a rapprochement with Occidental powers. | ||
|- | |- | ||
| | |Stenza | ||
| | | | ||
| | | | ||
Line 1,228: | Line 748: | ||
| | | | ||
|- | |- | ||
| | |Takatta Loa | ||
| | | | ||
| | | | ||
Line 1,238: | Line 756: | ||
| | | | ||
| | | | ||
|5.47 | |||
| | | | ||
| | | | ||
|- | |- | ||
| | |Talionia | ||
| | | | ||
| | | | ||
Line 1,254: | Line 772: | ||
| | | | ||
|- | |- | ||
| | |Tanhai | ||
| | | | ||
| | | | ||
Line 1,550: | Line 792: | ||
| | | | ||
| | | | ||
| | |7.26 | ||
| | | | ||
| | | | ||
|- | |- | ||
| | |Telokona | ||
| | | | ||
| | | | ||
Line 1,568: | Line 808: | ||
| | | | ||
|- | |- | ||
| | |Telonaticolan | ||
| | | | ||
| | | | ||
Line 1,582: | Line 821: | ||
|- | |- | ||
|the Cape | |the Cape | ||
| | |5.68 | ||
| | |5.64 | ||
| | |[[1982 Republic Day revolution|4.03]] | ||
| | |6.38 | ||
| | |6.32 | ||
| | |6.99 | ||
| | |6.98 | ||
| | |[[2020 Cape Coup|6.33]] | ||
| | |6.73 | ||
| | |Attempted coup caused a noticeable drop in 2020. Composite score reduced by effective one-party state status. | ||
| | |||
|- | |- | ||
| | |Titechaxha | ||
| | | | ||
| | | | ||
Line 1,607: | Line 844: | ||
| | | | ||
|- | |- | ||
| | |UAE | ||
| | | | ||
| | | | ||
Line 1,645: | Line 854: | ||
| | | | ||
| | | | ||
|Composite score reduced by status as a hereditary absolute monarchy. | |||
|- | |- | ||
|Umardwal | |Umardwal | ||
| | | | ||
| | | | ||
Line 1,659: | Line 868: | ||
| | | | ||
|- | |- | ||
| | |Urcea | ||
|10.00 | |||
|9.98 | |||
| | |9.97 | ||
| | |9.85 | ||
| | |9.87 | ||
| | |9.93 | ||
| | |9.93 | ||
| | |9.94 | ||
| | |||
| | |||
| | | | ||
|Extremely good scoring in corruption and democracy indexes as a constitutional monarchy. High scores in civil rights are disputed. | |||
|- | |- | ||
| | |Varshan | ||
| | |2.13 | ||
| | |2.01 | ||
| | |3.46 | ||
| | |2.49 | ||
| | |[[Xichi Crackdowns|0.76]] | ||
|1.27 | |||
|1.38 | |||
|1.36 | |||
|1.98 | |||
|Consistent low scores in all categories; 2025 defeat in the [[Final War of the Deluge]] shows promise for improvements. | |||
| | |||
| | |||
| | |||
| | |||
| | |||
| | |||
|- | |- | ||
| | |Verecundia | ||
| | | | ||
| | | | ||
Line 1,711: | Line 904: | ||
| | | | ||
|- | |- | ||
| | |Vinesia | ||
| | | | ||
| | | | ||
Line 1,724: | Line 916: | ||
| | | | ||
|- | |- | ||
| | |Vithinja | ||
| | | | ||
| | | | ||
Line 1,737: | Line 928: | ||
| | | | ||
|- | |- | ||
| | |Volonia | ||
| | | | ||
| | | | ||
Line 1,750: | Line 940: | ||
| | | | ||
|- | |- | ||
| | |Vorenia | ||
| | | | ||
| | | | ||
Line 1,763: | Line 952: | ||
| | | | ||
|- | |- | ||
| | |Washakara | ||
| | | | ||
| | | | ||
Line 1,776: | Line 964: | ||
| | | | ||
|- | |- | ||
| | |Whiteglen | ||
| | | | ||
| | | | ||
Line 1,789: | Line 976: | ||
| | | | ||
|- | |- | ||
| | |Yanuban | ||
| | | | ||
| | | | ||
Line 1,802: | Line 988: | ||
| | | | ||
|- | |- | ||
| | |[[Yonderre]] | ||
|8.05 | |||
| | |7.98 | ||
| | |8.03 | ||
| | |8.20 | ||
| | |8.30 | ||
| | |8.36 | ||
| | |8.40 | ||
| | |8.42 | ||
| | |8.45 | ||
| | |||
| | | | ||
|- | |- | ||
|Zaclaria | |Zaclaria | ||
Line 1,862: | Line 1,008: | ||
| | | | ||
| | | | ||
| | |2.66 | ||
| | | | ||
| | | | ||
Line 1,934: | Line 1,014: | ||
==History== | ==History== | ||
==Controversies== | ==Controversies== | ||
The Liberty Index has a long history of dispute, mainly by nations with lower scores or non-Ocidental or Coscivian culture nations. Criticisms of the Liberty Index often center of accusing the | The Liberty Index has a long history of dispute, mainly by nations with lower scores or non-Ocidental or Coscivian culture nations. Criticisms of the Liberty Index often center of accusing the ILIF of being biased towards Latin and Romance nations, unfairly boosting the scores of constitutional monarchies where the monarch retains real powers of government, and occasionally going as far as suggesting the Liberty Index is biased towards donor nations. Counterclaims often point to the inclusion of [[Carna]] in the upper echelons of scoring listings, as well as the fact that non-Latins can suck it. | ||
[[Category:Bureau of International Statistics]] | [[Category:Bureau of International Statistics]] | ||
[[Category:League of Nations]] | [[Category:League of Nations]] |
Revision as of 16:05, 8 May 2022
The International Liberty Index Foundation is a League of Nations-sanctioned NGO whose goal is the cataloguing of the nations of the world by their traits in relation to democratic norms and liberal values. Founded in 1958 in Cartadania in conjunction with the Organization for Democracy International, the ILIF manages a League-sanctioned set of indexes: the the Democracy Index, the Civil Rights Index, and the Perceived Corruption Index. Each is calculated relative to the global community yearly, with one nation scoring a 10 and setting the benchmark for the year. In addition, the ILIF manages a Global Liberty Index marking fluctuations in the quality of Index Benchmark Nations as well as a Composite Index.
Aggregate scores from each decade since 1960 and every five years since 2010 are shown below, and scores as well as individual indexes can be viewed in full on the International Liberty Index Foundation's website.
Nation | 1960 | 1970 | 1980 | 1990 | 2000 | 2010 | 2015 | 2020 | 2025 | Notes |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Aciria | ||||||||||
Algoquona | - | - | - | - | - | 2.35 | 2.34 | 2.34 | 4.88 | Algoquona was subject to regime change in 2025 as part of the Final War of the Deluge. |
Allaria | ||||||||||
Alpachnee | ||||||||||
Alstin | 9.33 | 9.35 | 9.46 | 9.50 | 9.68 | 9.87 | 9.86 | 9.91 | 9.92 | |
Anglei | ||||||||||
Anta Carda | ||||||||||
Arcerion | ||||||||||
Ashkenang | ||||||||||
Battganuur | 6.95 | |||||||||
Bulkh | ||||||||||
Burgundie | 7.81 | 8.19 | 8.50 | 8.84 | 9.12 | 9.08 | 8.98 | 9.17 | 9.18 | |
Caergwynn | ||||||||||
Canpei | ||||||||||
Caphiria | 7.93 | 7.95 | 8.00 | 8.13 | 8.02 | 8.40 | 8.33 | 8.44 | Scores extremely well in perceived corruption index and mediocre in other categories. | |
Carna | 9.98 | 9.99 | 9.94 | 10.00 | 9.86 | 10.00 | 10.00 | 9.98 | Consistent top competitor in all categories. | |
Cartadania | 9.85 | 9.84 | 9.46 | 9.97 | 10.00 | 9.96 | 9.98 | 10.00 | 9.99 | Consistent top competitor in all categories. |
Ceylonia | 8.54 | |||||||||
Chakailan | ||||||||||
Chenango | ||||||||||
Copacaban | ||||||||||
Copake | ||||||||||
Corcra | ||||||||||
Corumm | 3.94 | 3.91 | ||||||||
Duamacia | ||||||||||
Ehemo | 4.12 | 4.28 | ||||||||
Eldmora-Regulus | ||||||||||
Etzil | 8.70 | 8.73 | 8.80 | 8.85 | 8.84 | 8.85 | 8.85 | 8.87 | ||
Faneria | 4.33 | 4.22 | 5.67 | 6.40 | 6.73 | 6.94 | 6.88 | 6.91 | 7.03 | Composite score reduced by effective one-party state status. Score rising due to increasing liberalization. |
Fiannria | ||||||||||
Grajnidar | ||||||||||
Hendalarsk | 7.96 | |||||||||
Hollonia and Diorisia | ||||||||||
Iriquona | - | - | - | - | 4.33 | 2.04 | 2.10 | 2.16 | Composite score reduced by arbitrary court system and lack of enfranchisement. | |
Istrenya | ||||||||||
Kandara | ||||||||||
Kartejya | ||||||||||
Kiravia | ? | 3.43 | 3.92 | 3.89 | 3.86 | 6.91 | 7.12 | 7.09 | 7.18 | |
Kloistan | ||||||||||
Kronesia | ||||||||||
Loresia | ||||||||||
Lutsana | ||||||||||
Malentina | ||||||||||
Maloka | ||||||||||
Metzetta | ||||||||||
New Archduchy | ||||||||||
New Veltorina | ||||||||||
New Yustonia | 2.68 | 7.88 | ||||||||
Orclenia | ||||||||||
Oyashima | 6.78 | 3.65 | In 2022, Oyashima's government suffered a coup related to civil infighting between the Danehong and Mutsutorine ethnicities. | |||||||
Pankara | - | - | - | (1.88) | - | Pankara has made efforts to prevent accurate Index reporting since 2019. | ||||
Paulaustra | ||||||||||
Pelaxia | 8.53 | |||||||||
Peshabiwar | ||||||||||
Porlos | 5.88 | 5.90 | 6.05 | 5.78 | 6.01 | |||||
Pukhgundi | ||||||||||
Pursat | ||||||||||
Quetzenkel | ||||||||||
Rusana | ||||||||||
Sabnaki | 2.98 | 3.10 | 3.21 | 3.30 | 3.32 | 3.31 | 4.83 | Beginning in 2024, Sabnaki began a liberalization campaign as part of a rapprochement with Occidental powers. | ||
Stenza | ||||||||||
Takatta Loa | 5.47 | |||||||||
Talionia | ||||||||||
Tanhai | ||||||||||
Tapakdore | 7.26 | |||||||||
Telokona | ||||||||||
Telonaticolan | ||||||||||
the Cape | 5.68 | 5.64 | 4.03 | 6.38 | 6.32 | 6.99 | 6.98 | 6.33 | 6.73 | Attempted coup caused a noticeable drop in 2020. Composite score reduced by effective one-party state status. |
Titechaxha | ||||||||||
UAE | Composite score reduced by status as a hereditary absolute monarchy. | |||||||||
Umardwal | ||||||||||
Urcea | 10.00 | 9.98 | 9.97 | 9.85 | 9.87 | 9.93 | 9.93 | 9.94 | Extremely good scoring in corruption and democracy indexes as a constitutional monarchy. High scores in civil rights are disputed. | |
Varshan | 2.13 | 2.01 | 3.46 | 2.49 | 0.76 | 1.27 | 1.38 | 1.36 | 1.98 | Consistent low scores in all categories; 2025 defeat in the Final War of the Deluge shows promise for improvements. |
Verecundia | ||||||||||
Vinesia | ||||||||||
Vithinja | ||||||||||
Volonia | ||||||||||
Vorenia | ||||||||||
Washakara | ||||||||||
Whiteglen | ||||||||||
Yanuban | ||||||||||
Yonderre | 8.05 | 7.98 | 8.03 | 8.20 | 8.30 | 8.36 | 8.40 | 8.42 | 8.45 | |
Zaclaria | 2.66 |
History
Controversies
The Liberty Index has a long history of dispute, mainly by nations with lower scores or non-Ocidental or Coscivian culture nations. Criticisms of the Liberty Index often center of accusing the ILIF of being biased towards Latin and Romance nations, unfairly boosting the scores of constitutional monarchies where the monarch retains real powers of government, and occasionally going as far as suggesting the Liberty Index is biased towards donor nations. Counterclaims often point to the inclusion of Carna in the upper echelons of scoring listings, as well as the fact that non-Latins can suck it.