Liberty Index: Difference between revisions

From IxWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
VisualWikitext
m (Text replacement - "Xingkai'pei" to "Tanhai")
 
(22 intermediate revisions by 5 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
Liberty index is composite of three LoN indexes - the Democracy index, civil rights index, and perceived corruption index. Each is calculated yearly (? maybe no because bloat), with 10 being the highest scoring nation and the benchmark for measurement.
The '''International Liberty Index Foundation''' is a [[League of Nations]]-sanctioned NGO centered on recording and comparing global survey and analytical data to produce comprehensive data for a number of metrics centered around the spread of political freedoms and systems, corruption in governments and societies, social values and norms, and civil rights. Originally founded in 1958 in Cartadania in conjunction with the Organization for Democracy International, the ILIF originally managed a League-sanctioned set of indexes: the the Democracy Index, the Civil Rights Index, and the Perceived Corruption Index. Individually, each is scored to a maximum value of 10, the highest of which sets the year's benchmark. Scores for these indices are also available comparatively between years to show the improvement of benchmark-setters year by year. These are typically shown compiled into a single score in the form of the Liberty Index, a {{wp|norm-referenced test|norm-referenced scoring system}} which provides a relative, simple view of a country's overall social and political freedoms.  


something something controversy over biased reporting always an issue, Varshani or someone else raised hell over it, lower nations say it favors Latin-Romance nations and is an attack or so on
Over time, the ILIF has expanded to cover a number of analytical metrics, absorbing several related NGOs such as the Poverty Tracking Organization. As a result, the ILIF published a number of datasets on global GDP and wellbeing metrics which are used by the League of Nations and other international bodies through annual publications.
 
Each is calculated relative to the global community yearly, with one nation scoring a 10 and setting the benchmark for the year. In addition, the ILIF manages a Global Liberty Index marking fluctuations in the quality of Index Benchmark Nations as well as a Composite Index.
 
== Countries by Wealth ==
 
==== GDP ====
 
==== GDPPC ====
 
==== Poverty Rate ====
 
== Countries by Education and Health ==
 
==== Life Expectancy ====
 
==== Mean Years Schooling ====
 
==== Literacy Rate ====
 
==== Population Density ====
 
== Composite Liberty Index ==
Aggregate scores from each decade since 1960 and every five years since 2010 are shown below, and scores as well as individual indexes can be viewed in full on the International Liberty Index Foundation's [[website]].
{| class="wikitable sortable mw-collapsible mw-collapsed"
{| class="wikitable sortable mw-collapsible mw-collapsed"
|+Democracy Index by Country
|+Composite Liberty Index Scores by Country (Quinquennial)
!Nation
!Nation
!1960
!1960
Line 10: Line 33:
!1990
!1990
!2000
!2000
!2005
!2010
!2010
!2015
!2015
Line 17: Line 39:
!Notes
!Notes
|-
|-
|Fiannria
|[[Aciria]]
|
|
|
|
|
Line 30: Line 51:
|
|
|-
|-
|[[Yonderre]]
|[[Algosh Republic|Algoquona]]
|8.05
| -
|7.98
| -
|8.03
| -
|8.20
| -
|8.30
| -
|8.29
|2.35
|8.36
|2.34
|8.40
|2.34
|8.42
|4.88
|8.45
|Algoquona was subject to regime change in 2025 as part of the [[Final War of the Deluge]].
|
|-
|-
|Cartadania
|[[Allaria]]
|9.85
|9.84
|9.46
|9.97
|10.00
|9.93
|9.96
|9.98
|10.00
|9.99
|
|
|-
|Carna
|9.98
|9.99
|9.94
|10.00
|9.86
|10.00
|10.00
|10.00
|9.98
|
|
|
|
|-
|Urcea
|10.00
|9.98
|9.97
|9.85
|9.87
|9.99
|9.93
|9.93
|9.94
|
|
|
|
|-
|Kore'hetanua
|8.99
|9.43
|10.00
|9.96
|9.90
|9.93
|9.93
|9.93
|9.92
|
|
|
|
|-
|[[Alstin]]
|9.33
|9.35
|9.46
|9.50
|9.68
|9.73
|9.87
|9.86
|9.91
|9.92
|
|
|-
|Yytuskia
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|9.12
|
|
|-
|Burgundie
|7.81
|8.19
|8.50
|8.84
|9.12
|9.13
|9.08
|8.98
|9.17
|9.18
|N/A
|-
|-
|Etzil
|[[Alpachnee Confederation|Alpachnee]]
|8.70
|8.73
|8.80
|8.85
|8.84
|8.86
|8.85
|8.85
|8.87
|
|
|
|
|-
|Cohe
|
|
|8.64
|
|
|
|
Line 155: Line 84:
|
|
|
|
|
| -
|8.64
|
|
|
|-
|-
|Pelaxia
|[[Alstin]]
|
|9.33
|
|9.35
|
|9.46
|
|9.50
|
|9.68
|
|9.87
|
|9.86
|
|9.91
|8.53
|9.92
|
|
|
|-
|-
|Prevalia
|[[Anglei]]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|8.49
|8.49
|
|
|-
|Ceylonia
|
|
|
|
Line 192: Line 108:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|8.54
|
|
|
|
|-
|-
|Heku
|[[Anta Carda]]
|7.93
|7.95
|8.00
|8.13
|8.02
|8.45
|8.40
|8.33
|8.44
|
|
|
|
|-
|Pukhtunkhwa
|4.30
|
|
|
|
Line 220: Line 120:
|
|
|
|
|
|8.01
|
|
|
|
|-
|-
|Hendalarsk
|[[Arcerion]]
|
|
|
|
Line 234: Line 132:
|
|
|
|
|7.96
|
|
|
|
|-
|-
|Galicia
| [[Ashkenang]]
|
| -
|
| -
|
| -
|
| -
|
| -
|
| -
|
| -
|7.90
| -
|7.90
|
|
|-
|Tapakdore
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|7.26
|
|
|-
|Kiravia
|?
|3.43
|3.92
|3.89
|[[Kirosocialism|3.86]]
|6.89
|6.91
|7.12
|7.09
|7.18
|
|-
|Wonjin
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|7.02
|
|
|
|
|-
|-
|Battganuur
|[[Battganuur]]
|
|
|
|
|
Line 303: Line 159:
|
|
|-
|-
|Faneria
|[[Bulkh]]
|4.33
|4.22
|5.67
|6.40
|6.73
|6.92
|6.94
|6.88
|6.91
|
|
|
|
|-
|the Cape
| 5.68
|5.64
|[[1982 Republic Day revolution|4.03]]
|6.38
|6.32
|6.01
|6.99
|6.98
|[[2020 Cape Coup|6.33]]
|6.73
|Attempted Coup (link or name needed) and reaction caused a noticeable drop in 2020.
|-
|Wealdland
|
|
|
|
Line 336: Line 168:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|6.30
|
|
|
|
|-
|-
|Peshblwar
|[[Burgundie]]
|
|7.81
|
| 8.19
|
|8.50
|
|8.84
|
|9.12
|
|9.08
|
|8.98
|
|9.17
|6.15
|9.18
|
|
|
|-
|-
|Umardwal
|[[Caergwynn]]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|6.14
|
|
|
|
|-
|Porlos
|
|
|
|
|
|5.88
|5.90
|6.10
|6.05
|5.78
|6.01
|
|
|
|
|-
|-
|Yanuban
|[[Canpei]]
|
|
|
|
Line 390: Line 204:
|
|
|
|
|5.50
|
|
|
|
|-
|-
|Takatta Loa
|[[Caphiria]]
|
|7.93
|
|7.95
|
|8.00
|
|8.13
|
|8.02
|
|8.40
|
|8.33
|
|8.44
|5.47
|
|
|
|Scores extremely well in perceived corruption index and mediocre in other categories.
|-
|-
|Titechaxha
| [[Carna]]
|
|9.98
|
|9.99
|
|9.94
|
|10.00
|
|9.86
|
|10.00
|
| 10.00
|
|9.98
|5.18
|
|
|
|Consistent top competitor in all categories.
|-
|-
|Kandara
|[[Cartadania]]
|
|9.85
|
|9.84
|
|9.46
|
|9.97
|
|10.00
|
|9.96
|
|9.98
|
|10.00
|5.09
|9.99
|
|Consistent top competitor in all categories.
|
|-
|-
|Tanhai
|[[Ceylonia]]
|
|
|
|
Line 441: Line 251:
|
|
|
|
|
|8.54
|4.70
|
|
|
|
|-
|-
|Istrenya
|[[Chakailan]]
|
|
|
|
Line 455: Line 264:
|
|
|
|
|4.70
|
|
|
|
|-
|-
|Pursat
|[[Chenango Confederacy|Chenango]]
|
| -
|
| -
|
| -
|
| -
|
| -
|
| -
|
| -
|
| -
|4.68
|
|
|
|
|-
|-
|Dhavastu
|[[Copacaban Republic|Copacaban]]
|
| -
|
| -
|
| -
|
| -
|
|
|
|
|4.67
|
|
|-
|Ehemo
|
|
|4.12
|
|
|
|
|
|4.28
|
|
|-
|Canpei
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|4.12
|
|
|-
|West Bussdaberria
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|3.99
|
|
|-
|Corumm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|3.94
|
|
|-
|Jalqolak
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|3.77
|
|
|-
|Kelekona
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|3.39
|
|
|-
|Sabnaki
| -
| -
| -
| -
| -
| -
| -
| -
|
|
|
|
|3.31
|
|
|-
|Zaclaria
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|2.66
|
|
|-
|Kulaparkar
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|2.52
|
|
|
|
|-
|-
|Algoquona/Algosh Republic
|[[Copake]]
| -
| -
| -
| -
| -
| -
| -
| -
| -
|2.
|2.35
|2.34
|2.34
|4.88
|
|-
|Iriquona
| -
| -
| -
| -
| -
| -
| -
| -
|4.33
|4.06
|2.04
|2.10
|2.16
|
|
|
|
|-
|-
|Pankara
|[[Corcra]]
|
|
|
|
Line 637: Line 312:
|
|
|
|
|1.88
|
|
|
|
|-
|-
|Varshan
|[[Daxia]]
|2.13
|2.01
|3.46
|2.49
|2.45
|[[Xichi Crackdowns|0.76]]
|1.27
|1.38
|1.36
|1.98
|
|
|-
|East Bussdaberria
|
|
|
|
Line 661: Line 323:
|
|
|
|
|3.94
|3.91
|
|
|
|1.15
|1.14
|
|}
{| class="wikitable sortable mw-collapsible mw-collapsed"
|+Civil Rights Index by Country
!Nation
!1960
!1970
!1980
!1990
!2000
!2005
!2010
!2015
!2020
!2025
!Notes
|-
|-
|Burgundie
|[[Duōmachāha]]
|6.8
|4.23
|7.5
|5.02
|8.1
|4.89
|8.4
|4.67
|8.8
|5.81
|9.1
| 5.83
|8.7
|5.96
|8.9
|6.12
|9.2
|5.93
|
|The Duama Sovereign Socialist Republics was replaced by the People's Republic of Duōmachāha in 1994.
|N/A
|-
|-
|Fiannria
|[[Ehemo]]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|4.12
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|4.28
|
|
|
|
|-
|-
|Yonderre
|[[Eldmora-Regulus]]
|
|
|
|
|
Line 721: Line 363:
|
|
|-
|-
|Cartadania
| [[Etzil]]
|
|8.70
|
|8.73
|
|8.80
|
|8.85
|
|8.84
|
|8.85
|
|8.85
|
|8.87
|
|
|
|
|
|-
|-
|Carna
|[[Faneria]]
|
|4.33
|
|4.22
|
|5.67
|
|6.40
|
|6.73
|
|6.94
|
| 6.88
|
|6.91
|
|7.03
|
|Composite score reduced by effective one-party state status. Score rising due to increasing liberalization.
|
|-
|-
|Urcea
|[[Fiannria]]
|
|
|
|
|
Line 760: Line 399:
|
|
|-
|-
|Kore'hetanua
|[[Grajnidar]]
|
|
|
|
|
Line 773: Line 411:
|
|
|-
|-
|Alstin
|[[Hendalarsk]]
|
|
|
|
|
|
Line 783: Line 419:
|
|
|
|
|7.96
|
|
|
|
|-
|-
|Yytuskia
|[[Hollona and Diorisia]]
|
|
|
|
|
Line 799: Line 435:
|
|
|-
|-
|Etzil
|[[Netansett]]
|
| -
|
| -
|
| -
|
| -
|
|4.33
|
|2.04
|
|2.10
|
|2.16
|
|
|
|
|Composite score reduced by arbitrary court system and lack of enfranchisement.
|-
|-
|Cohe
| [[Istrenya]]
|
|
|
|
|
Line 825: Line 459:
|
|
|-
|-
|Pelaxia
|[[Kandara]]
|
|
|
|
|
Line 838: Line 471:
|
|
|-
|-
|Prevalia
|[[Kartejya]]
|
|
|
|
|
Line 851: Line 483:
|
|
|-
|-
|Ceylonia
|[[Kiravia]]
|
|?
|
|3.43
|
|3.92
|
|3.89
|
|[[Kirosocialism|3.86]]
|
|6.91
|
|7.12
|
|7.09
|
|7.18
|
|
|
|-
|-
|Heku
|[[Kronesia]]
|
|
|
|
|
Line 877: Line 507:
|
|
|-
|-
|Pukhtunkhwa
|[[Loresia]]
|
|
|
|
|
Line 890: Line 519:
|
|
|-
|-
|Hendalarsk
|[[Malentina]]
|
|
|
|
|
Line 903: Line 531:
|
|
|-
|-
|Galicia
|[[Maloka]]
|
| -
|
| -
|
| -
|
| -
|
| -
|
| -
|
| -
|
| -
|
|
|
|
|
|-
|-
|Tapakdore
|[[Metzetta]]
|
|
|
|
|
Line 929: Line 555:
|
|
|-
|-
|Kiravia
|[[New Archduchy]]
|
|
|
|
|
Line 942: Line 567:
|
|
|-
|-
|Wonjin
|[[New Veltorina]]
|
|
|
|
|
Line 955: Line 579:
|
|
|-
|-
|the Cape
|[[New Harren]]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Line 966: Line 587:
|
|
|
|
|2.68
|7.88
|
|
|-
|-
|Battganuur
|[[Orclenia]]
|
|
|
|
|
Line 981: Line 603:
|
|
|-
|-
|Faneria
|[[Oyashima]]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Line 993: Line 611:
|
|
|
|
|6.78
|3.65
|In 2022, Oyashima's government suffered a coup related to civil infighting between the Danehong and Mutsutorine ethnicities.
|-
|-
|Wealdland
|[[Pankara]]
|
| -
|
| -
|
| -
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|(1.88)
| -
|Pankara has made efforts to prevent accurate Index reporting since 2019.
|-
|-
|Peshblwar
|[[Paulastra]]
|
|
|
|
|
Line 1,020: Line 639:
|
|
|-
|-
|Umardwal
|[[Pelaxia]]
|
|
|
|
|
|
Line 1,030: Line 647:
|
|
|
|
|8.53
|
|
|
|
|-
|-
|Porlos
|[[Peshabiwar]]
|
|
|
|
|
Line 1,046: Line 663:
|
|
|-
|-
|Yanuban
|[[Porlos]]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|5.88
|5.90
|6.05
|5.78
|6.01
|
|
|
|
|-
|-
|Takatta Loa
|[[Pukhgundi]]
|
|
|
|
|
Line 1,072: Line 687:
|
|
|-
|-
|Titechaxha
|[[Pursat]]
|
|
|
|
|
Line 1,085: Line 699:
|
|
|-
|-
|Kandara
|[[Quetzenkel]]
|
|
|
|
|
Line 1,098: Line 711:
|
|
|-
|-
|Tanhai
|[[Rusana]]
|
|
|
|
|
Line 1,111: Line 723:
|
|
|-
|-
|Istrenya
|[[Sabnaki]]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|2.98
|3.10
|3.21
|3.30
|3.32
|3.31
|4.83
|Beginning in 2024, Sabnaki began a liberalization campaign as part of a rapprochement with Occidental powers.
|-
|-
|Pursat
|[[Stenza]]
|
|
|
|
|
Line 1,137: Line 747:
|
|
|-
|-
|Dhavastu
|[[Loa Republic]]
|
|
|
|
|
|
Line 1,147: Line 755:
|
|
|
|
|5.47
|
|
|
|
|-
|-
|Ehemo
|[[Lariana]]
|
|
|
|
|
Line 1,163: Line 771:
|
|
|-
|-
|Canpei
|[[Tapakdore]]
|
|
|
|
|
|
Line 1,173: Line 779:
|
|
|
|
|7.26
|
|
|
|
|-
|-
|West Bussdaberria
|[[Telokona]]
|
|
|
|
|
Line 1,189: Line 795:
|
|
|-
|-
|Corumm
|[[Telonaticolan]]
|
|
|
|
|
Line 1,202: Line 807:
|
|
|-
|-
|Jalqolak
|[[the Cape]]
|
|5.68
|
|5.64
|
|[[1982 Republic Day revolution|4.03]]
|
|6.38
|
|6.32
|
|6.99
|
|6.98
|
|[[2020 Cape Coup|6.33]]
|
|6.73
|
|Attempted coup caused a noticeable drop in 2020. Composite score reduced by effective one-party state status.
|
|-
|Kelekona
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|-
|Sabnaki
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|-
|Zaclaria
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|-
|Kulaparkar
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|-
|Algoquona/Algosh Republic
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|-
|Iriquona
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|-
|Pankara
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|-
|East Bussdaberria
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|}
{| class="wikitable sortable mw-collapsible mw-collapsed"
|+Perceived Freedom from Corruption Index by Country
!Nation
!1960
!1970
!1980
!1990
!2000
!2005
!2010
!2015
!2020
!2025
!Notes
|-
|Burgundie
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|-
|Fiannria
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|-
|Yonderre
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|-
|Cartadania
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|-
|Carna
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|-
|Urcea
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|-
|Kore'hetanua
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|-
|Alstin
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|-
|Yytuskia
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|-
|Etzil
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|-
|Cohe
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|-
|Pelaxia
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|-
|Prevalia
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|-
|Ceylonia
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|-
|Heku
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|-
|Pukhtunkhwa
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|-
|Hendalarsk
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|-
|Galicia
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|-
|Tapakdore
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|-
|Kiravia
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|-
|Wonjin
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|-
|the Cape
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|-
|Battganuur
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|-
|Faneria
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|-
|Wealdland
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|-
|Peshblwar
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|-
|Umardwal
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|-
|Porlos
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|-
|Yanuban
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|-
|Takatta Loa
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|-
|-
|Titechaxha
|Titechaxha
|
|
|
|
|
Line 1,737: Line 831:
|
|
|-
|-
|Kandara
|UAE
|
|
|
|
|
|
Line 1,749: Line 841:
|
|
|
|
|Composite score reduced by status as a hereditary absolute monarchy.
|-
|-
|Tanhai
|[[Umardwal]]
|
|
|
|
|
Line 1,763: Line 855:
|
|
|-
|-
|Istrenya
|[[Urcea]]
|
|10.00
|
|9.98
|
|9.97
|
|9.85
|
|9.87
|
|9.93
|
|9.93
|
|9.94
|
|
|
|
|Extremely good scoring in corruption and democracy indexes as a constitutional monarchy. High scores in civil rights are disputed.
|-
|-
|Pursat
|[[Varshan]]
|
|2.13
|
|2.01
|
|3.46
|
|2.49
|
|[[Xichi Crackdowns|0.76]]
|
|1.27
|
|1.38
|
|1.36
|
|1.98
|
|Consistent low scores in all categories; 2025 defeat in the [[Final War of the Deluge]] shows promise for improvements.
|
|-
|Dhavastu
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|-
|-
|Ehemo
|Verecundia
|
|
|
|
|
Line 1,815: Line 891:
|
|
|-
|-
|Canpei
|Vinesia
|
|
|
|
|
Line 1,828: Line 903:
|
|
|-
|-
|West Bussdaberria
|[[Vithinja]]
|
|3.91
|
|4.78
|
|4.22
|
|5.42
|
|6.67
|
|6.12
|
|6.22
|
|6.77
|
|6.93
|
|
|
|-
|-
|Corumm
|Volonia
|
|
|
|
|
Line 1,854: Line 927:
|
|
|-
|-
|Jalqolak
|Vorenia
|
|
|
|
|
Line 1,867: Line 939:
|
|
|-
|-
|Kelekona
|Washakara
| -
|
|
|
|
Line 1,880: Line 951:
|
|
|-
|-
|Sabnaki
|[[Whiteglen]]
| -
| -
| -
|
|
|
|
|1.76
|2.01
|
|2.11
|-
|Zaclaria
|
|
|
|
|
Line 1,906: Line 963:
|
|
|-
|-
|Kulaparkar
| [[Yanuban]]
|
|
|
|
|
Line 1,919: Line 975:
|
|
|-
|-
|Algoquona/Algosh Republic
|[[Yonderre]]
| -
|8.05
| -
|7.98
| -
|8.03
| -
|8.20
|
|8.30
|
| 8.36
|
|8.40
|
|8.42
|
| 8.45
|
|
|
|-
|-
|Iriquona
| [[Zaclaria]]
| -
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|-
|Pankara
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|-
|East Bussdaberria
|
|
|
|
|
|
Line 1,968: Line 995:
|
|
|
|
|2.66
|
|
|
|
|}
|}
==History==
==History==
==Controversies==
==Controversies==
The Liberty Index has a long history of dispute, mainly by nations with lower scores or non-Ocidental or Coscivian culture nations. Criticisms of the Liberty Index often center of accusing the Organization for Democracy International of being biased towards Latin and Romance nations, unfairly favoring constitutional monarchies where the monarch retains real powers of government, and occasionally going as far as suggesting the Liberty Index is biased towards donor nations. Counterclaims often point to the inclusion of [[Carna]] in the upper echelons of scoring listings, as well as the fact that non-Latins can suck it.
The Liberty Index and other scoring metrics used by the ILIF have often been criticized as unduly favoring Occidental and Coscivian cultures over Alshari, Cronan, and Audonian nations, as well as opposing arguments from liberal nations decrying the institution of supposedly artificially inflating the scores of constitutional monarchies. In some cases, these arguments go so far as to suggest that the ILIF is little but a propaganda front for League donor nations.


In 2002, [[Varshan]] attempted unsuccessfully to sue the ILIF into in League courts on a number of accusations amounting to vexatious litigation. Several of these cases remained in limbo until Varshan's expulsion from the League of Nations.
[[Category:Bureau of International Statistics]]
[[Category:Bureau of International Statistics]]
[[Category:IXWB]]
[[Category:League of Nations]]
[[Category:League of Nations]]

Latest revision as of 15:00, 16 March 2024

The International Liberty Index Foundation is a League of Nations-sanctioned NGO centered on recording and comparing global survey and analytical data to produce comprehensive data for a number of metrics centered around the spread of political freedoms and systems, corruption in governments and societies, social values and norms, and civil rights. Originally founded in 1958 in Cartadania in conjunction with the Organization for Democracy International, the ILIF originally managed a League-sanctioned set of indexes: the the Democracy Index, the Civil Rights Index, and the Perceived Corruption Index. Individually, each is scored to a maximum value of 10, the highest of which sets the year's benchmark. Scores for these indices are also available comparatively between years to show the improvement of benchmark-setters year by year. These are typically shown compiled into a single score in the form of the Liberty Index, a norm-referenced scoring system which provides a relative, simple view of a country's overall social and political freedoms.

Over time, the ILIF has expanded to cover a number of analytical metrics, absorbing several related NGOs such as the Poverty Tracking Organization. As a result, the ILIF published a number of datasets on global GDP and wellbeing metrics which are used by the League of Nations and other international bodies through annual publications.

Each is calculated relative to the global community yearly, with one nation scoring a 10 and setting the benchmark for the year. In addition, the ILIF manages a Global Liberty Index marking fluctuations in the quality of Index Benchmark Nations as well as a Composite Index.

Countries by Wealth

GDP

GDPPC

Poverty Rate

Countries by Education and Health

Life Expectancy

Mean Years Schooling

Literacy Rate

Population Density

Composite Liberty Index

Aggregate scores from each decade since 1960 and every five years since 2010 are shown below, and scores as well as individual indexes can be viewed in full on the International Liberty Index Foundation's website.

Composite Liberty Index Scores by Country (Quinquennial)
Nation 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010 2015 2020 2025 Notes
Aciria
Algoquona - - - - - 2.35 2.34 2.34 4.88 Algoquona was subject to regime change in 2025 as part of the Final War of the Deluge.
Allaria
Alpachnee -
Alstin 9.33 9.35 9.46 9.50 9.68 9.87 9.86 9.91 9.92
Anglei
Anta Carda
Arcerion
Ashkenang - - - - - - - -
Battganuur 6.95
Bulkh
Burgundie 7.81 8.19 8.50 8.84 9.12 9.08 8.98 9.17 9.18
Caergwynn
Canpei
Caphiria 7.93 7.95 8.00 8.13 8.02 8.40 8.33 8.44 Scores extremely well in perceived corruption index and mediocre in other categories.
Carna 9.98 9.99 9.94 10.00 9.86 10.00 10.00 9.98 Consistent top competitor in all categories.
Cartadania 9.85 9.84 9.46 9.97 10.00 9.96 9.98 10.00 9.99 Consistent top competitor in all categories.
Ceylonia 8.54
Chakailan
Chenango - - - - - - - -
Copacaban - - - - - - - -
Copake - - - - - - - -
Corcra
Daxia 3.94 3.91
Duōmachāha 4.23 5.02 4.89 4.67 5.81 5.83 5.96 6.12 5.93 The Duama Sovereign Socialist Republics was replaced by the People's Republic of Duōmachāha in 1994.
Ehemo 4.12 4.28
Eldmora-Regulus
Etzil 8.70 8.73 8.80 8.85 8.84 8.85 8.85 8.87
Faneria 4.33 4.22 5.67 6.40 6.73 6.94 6.88 6.91 7.03 Composite score reduced by effective one-party state status. Score rising due to increasing liberalization.
Fiannria
Grajnidar
Hendalarsk 7.96
Hollona and Diorisia
Netansett - - - - 4.33 2.04 2.10 2.16 Composite score reduced by arbitrary court system and lack of enfranchisement.
Istrenya
Kandara
Kartejya
Kiravia ? 3.43 3.92 3.89 3.86 6.91 7.12 7.09 7.18
Kronesia
Loresia
Malentina
Maloka - - - - - - - -
Metzetta
New Archduchy
New Veltorina
New Harren 2.68 7.88
Orclenia
Oyashima 6.78 3.65 In 2022, Oyashima's government suffered a coup related to civil infighting between the Danehong and Mutsutorine ethnicities.
Pankara - - - (1.88) - Pankara has made efforts to prevent accurate Index reporting since 2019.
Paulastra
Pelaxia 8.53
Peshabiwar
Porlos 5.88 5.90 6.05 5.78 6.01
Pukhgundi
Pursat
Quetzenkel
Rusana
Sabnaki 2.98 3.10 3.21 3.30 3.32 3.31 4.83 Beginning in 2024, Sabnaki began a liberalization campaign as part of a rapprochement with Occidental powers.
Stenza
Loa Republic 5.47
Lariana
Tapakdore 7.26
Telokona
Telonaticolan
the Cape 5.68 5.64 4.03 6.38 6.32 6.99 6.98 6.33 6.73 Attempted coup caused a noticeable drop in 2020. Composite score reduced by effective one-party state status.
Titechaxha
UAE Composite score reduced by status as a hereditary absolute monarchy.
Umardwal
Urcea 10.00 9.98 9.97 9.85 9.87 9.93 9.93 9.94 Extremely good scoring in corruption and democracy indexes as a constitutional monarchy. High scores in civil rights are disputed.
Varshan 2.13 2.01 3.46 2.49 0.76 1.27 1.38 1.36 1.98 Consistent low scores in all categories; 2025 defeat in the Final War of the Deluge shows promise for improvements.
Verecundia
Vinesia
Vithinja 3.91 4.78 4.22 5.42 6.67 6.12 6.22 6.77 6.93
Volonia
Vorenia
Washakara
Whiteglen
Yanuban
Yonderre 8.05 7.98 8.03 8.20 8.30 8.36 8.40 8.42 8.45
Zaclaria 2.66

History

Controversies

The Liberty Index and other scoring metrics used by the ILIF have often been criticized as unduly favoring Occidental and Coscivian cultures over Alshari, Cronan, and Audonian nations, as well as opposing arguments from liberal nations decrying the institution of supposedly artificially inflating the scores of constitutional monarchies. In some cases, these arguments go so far as to suggest that the ILIF is little but a propaganda front for League donor nations.

In 2002, Varshan attempted unsuccessfully to sue the ILIF into in League courts on a number of accusations amounting to vexatious litigation. Several of these cases remained in limbo until Varshan's expulsion from the League of Nations.

Retrieved from "https://ixwiki.com/index.php?title=Liberty_Index&oldid=72313"